coworker is angry that I advocated for myself, freelancer drama, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My coworker is angry that I advocated for myself when I was hired

I work as a contractor at a company. I’m paid hourly and work a normal 40-hour work week. My coworker got curious about my contract and my schedule, and I was happy to answer some questions but not others. She got upset because I mentioned that I was very clear with what I wanted in this job when interviewing and when I was considering the offer. I even rejected an initial offer and later received a better offer.

I worry my coworker may make drama about it and cause others to become jealous as well. My manager seems to be happy with my work. I asked my coworker why she was upset and who she was upset with. Her answer in short is me because I shouldn’t be able to make demands during my interview. Do I ignore this and what do I do if it becomes drama?

Advocating for yourself and being clear on what it would take for you to accept a job isn’t “making demands”; it’s managing your career well and being appropriately assertive. If your coworker thinks people shouldn’t do that, that’s very sad for her; she’s internalized some seriously harmful beliefs.

Any chance you have the kind of relationship with her where you could say, “I was surprised you didn’t think people could or should do this in interviews. I regularly do it, and so do a lot of other people. I’d be glad to share with you how I’ve approached it in the past and what has worked, and you could try it yourself and hopefully negotiate well in future jobs.” (Make sure you say this in a genuinely warm and helpful tone, not a patronizing one.)

2. Do I thank someone for sending me work if he’s in a dispute with my friend?

A couple of years ago, a friend of mine, Gary, started a small company in the field in which I freelance. He hired Sean to be the manager. Neither Gary nor Sean lives in my city, but I saw them once while they were visiting; that’s the only time I’ve met Sean in person.

Sean oversaw a project I did for their company. He didn’t give me feedback for months, and when he did it was minimal. (I know I turned in solid work so this didn’t necessarily raise any flags for me.)

Fast forward about a year: Gary says that Sean is causing problems because he’s not giving feedback to anyone or performing the majority of the work he was hired to do. Being so behind schedule on everything was costing Gary thousands of dollars; he even had to take a second job to pay his rent. Eventually this led to a board meeting in which Sean was ousted.

Sean was, by all accounts, shocked, despite the fact that (according to Gary) he had been spoken to multiple times about these issues. There were threats of lawsuits, many dramatic emails, etc. But in the end, Sean disappeared into the ether. Gary is my friend, so I know I’m inclined to be on his side, but the fact that everyone else involved seemed to think Sean was the issue, plus the fact that it mirrored my own experience with him, made me think this wasn’t a witch hunt.

Fast forward six months: I get an email from someone interested in having me do some easy, well-paid freelance work … and they got my name from Sean. (Sean did not contact me to let me know he had referred me or follow up with me in any way.)

This freelance work has truly been a godsend — it’s my only steady stream of revenue at the moment. Do I have to thank Sean? We’ve only met once, have no relationship outside of the fact that we very briefly worked together, and he nearly made my friend homeless. Gary is so upset by the whole thing that I honestly believe he would see any communication with Sean as a betrayal.

But also, the referral was kind of him and extremely helpful. I’m a midwestern millennial woman, so the idea of not thanking him is crushing me with guilt but I know that that might be a me problem!

You don’t have to thank Sean, but you should. He referred you for easy, well-paid work that’s providing key income for you. It’s something you’d presumably like him to do again. And you don’t have any beef with Sean; Gary does. As badly as Sean’s work for Gary might have gone, that’s not really your business. (And for what it’s worth, Gary was Sean’s manager so he bears some responsibility for letting the problems go on as long as they did.)

Ultimately, you’re not involved in the Gary/Sean dispute and Sean referred you for work that you’re glad to have. If Gary takes issue with you sending him a civil thanks for that, Gary would be being a bad friend. (But also, you’re not obligated to disclose any of this to him.)

3. How to avoid burning out if you love your job

I landed a job I love so much. Let’s say I have a hobby of making banana pants, and I enjoy every aspect of it, even the stuff that most people dislike. Now I’ve gotten a job where I make banana pants for work. So I spend at least eight hours a day making banana pants, then I come home and do my hobby of making banana clothing for myself over the weekend. I try to keep a good work life balance, but I often find myself so engrossed in my work during the day that even if I intend to leave at 4, I often end up leaving at 6 because I’m just having too much fun — and even then I only leave at 6 because the train station nearest my work closes at 6:30. And that’s not even mentioning the times where I’ll bring my work projects home.

Due to my specific cocktail of neurodivergence, I also have trouble noticing that I’m not doing well until it’s too late. I don’t want to wake up one day and be like, “Oh wow, I am super depressed right now and have been for the past two months.” (Which has happened to me more than once.) I also don’t want to lose my love of making banana pants, which I’m afraid will happen if I keep going at the pace I’m going at.

Am I setting myself up for disaster here? If my hobby is making banana pants, am I still at risk for burnout? And if so, what are the signs of burnout and how can I combat it when my hobby is my job?

I do think you’re at risk of burnout even when you love your job. In fact, loving an activity and throwing yourself into it to the point that it consumes most of your waking hours is … kind of prime conditions for eventual burnout. Probably not this year! Maybe not next year. But eventually.

My advice is to find something else that you also love, or at least like a lot, and be deliberate about carving out space for it in your life too, so that your brain has more to engage it than just all banana pants all the time. I used to think the cure for burn-out was lots of downtime and relaxation — and sometimes it is — but what’s worked better for me personally is regularly using my brain for something completely different. Otherwise you’re just wearing the same grooves into it all the time and (at least for me) that’s been where my worst burn-out has come from.

4. Is this an exception to the “gifts flow downward” rule?

As someone who has managed many people in my long career, I fully support the “gifts flow downward” rule that you have expressed. This might be an exception though, and I’d like your opinion. My boss has invited our team of 8-10 senior-level colleagues to her house for a casual weekend afternoon together, along with our plus-ones. I’m generally a “don’t show up empty-handed” kind of person, so I want to bring something reasonable like a small plant or bottle of wine. That seems appropriate, right? Our boss is a supportive leader with good professional/personal boundaries, by the way.

That’s fine to do. You don’t need to do it — this is ultimately a work gathering, in the guise of a social one, so you don’t need to, but it’s likely to be perceived as gracious if you do. If you were very junior, I’d lean more on the side of nah, but you’re senior so the dynamics change a bit.

That said, unless you know your boss is a plant lover, I personally would not bring a plant or anything else that will require ongoing care, since for some people that’s like handing them a chore wrapped in pretty paper. But the general idea is fine!

5. Will having two two-year job stints damage my career?

I’ve been working in a male-dominated industry (97% men) and have always been the only woman on my team. Over the course of four years with my previous employer, I brought in $22 million for the company, but despite my success, I never received a promotion or a salary increase. After numerous attempts to negotiate for fair recognition, they refused, so I decided to leave. I accepted an executive position that was highly regarded in my field, becoming the only woman on the board. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a mistake. I was bullied constantly and denied the responsibilities we had agreed upon during the interview. The CEO even told me he would fire me if I got pregnant, claiming that mothers should stay home. After enduring two years of mistreatment, I resigned.

Now, I feel embarrassed for making the wrong choice and worry about how having a two-year stint on my resume might look. I’m also feeling pressure to stay long-term with my new employer, but I’m unsure if that’s what I want. They’ve assigned me to work in a developing country, 20 hours away from my family. The noise pollution here is unbearable. I haven’t been able to sleep through the night since I moved here. I’m okay with this arrangement for two years, but I’m concerned that having two consecutive two-year positions will reflect poorly on my resume. What do you think? I’ve been crying every night, overwhelmed with anxiety about my career path.

Leave! Please leave.

In the vast majority of fields, two two-year stints would not be a big deal at all. That’s well within the realm of “pretty normal” these days! Now, if you have four or five two-year stints in a row, it could be a bigger deal — but even that wouldn’t raise eyebrows in a lot of fields. (It would be more likely to be an issue for jobs where they expect and need people to stay longer than that, which still gives you access to a ton of jobs.)

Do be sure to do due diligence on the next job before you accept it since ideally you’d stay at the next one longer. But even then there’s no guarantee — jobs evolve, managers move on, life circumstances change.

my boss was suddenly fired and my employees are freaking out

A reader writes:

I work at a small company and my team is even smaller: it’s just me, two people who report to me, my boss (until yesterday), and the much more senior person who leads the team. My boss has always been incredibly competent, done great work (by my own account and by my grandboss’s account), and been a great manager/teacher/mentor to me and my direct reports.

Yesterday my grandboss suddenly announced that my boss had been fired, which was completely out of the blue for me and, based on the panic I was fielding from my direct reports, for them as well. My boss clearly also didn’t see it coming — the morning he was let go, he was communicating with me about logistical things (think “I’ll be tied up on a call for X project at 11 am, can you handle ABC and we’ll debrief afterward?”).

My grandboss and the head of my company gave us the news, and explicitly said this had nothing to do with performance or work quality (they reiterated that both of those were exceptional) but really just that it wasn’t a great fit and they just didn’t see him having a future here. They immediately followed that up with excitement about the replacement for my boss, to whom they’ve apparently already extended an offer (allegedly, the replacement verbally accepted the offer the night before they fired my boss).

My direct reports are understandably incredibly anxious about what this means for them and the organization, and the vague “his performance was amazing but we didn’t see a future for him here” only heightens the fear that they could just be fired at random with no idea why. The announcement about the replacement also felt callous and unnecessary and visibly rubbed my team the wrong way.

My grandboss approached me later to say that I shouldn’t worry about my job, and he asked if I thought he should talk to the two more junior people on the team. I thought it was obvious that was the right thing to do, but he handled the announcement so poorly that maybe it wouldn’t be!

I already have regular check-ins with my reports individually to discuss performance and am very clear with expectations (what’s required for their current role and in order to advance in the organization), areas for improvement, etc. They both are doing a great job. I also took each of them out individually after we got the news so they could vent and/or ask me any questions. But given 1) this was explicitly not performance-related and 2) I myself was visibly blindsided by the news (I blurted out “What? Why?” before I could stop myself, and have been very vocal prior to this about how highly I think of my boss), I can’t imagine either of them feels comforted by any reassurances coming from me.

Your employees are right to be alarmed, as are you!

If your company fires someone they themselves say was an “exceptional” performer, then it’s logical for everyone else to worry that they too might be fired out of the blue.

Now, maybe that’s not actually true. Maybe his boss had talked with him about other ways that the job wasn’t a fit. Who knows, maybe your boss was determined to pursue strategy X when his managers wanted strategy Y and this was just a difference in visions or tactics — although in that case you’d think they would have just said that, since it’s a lot easier to explain. Or maybe he questioned them too much, or maybe he did a great job on the day-to-day but struggled to set a broader vision, or he was good at X but they want the role to be more Y, or he had bad chemistry with the people above him. It’s also possible that your company uncovered something egregious (like, I don’t know, hiring sex workers on the company dime) and, in trying to protect his privacy, flubbed how they messaged it.

Or maybe it’s none of that and they make capricious decisions based on very little. Or they wanted to hire a senior manager’s brother-in-law and unceremoniously kicked out your boss so they could.

We don’t know, because their messaging on this was so bad.

You can’t credibly or ethically reassure your employees that their jobs are safe unless you have a better understanding of what happened.

Can you talk to your grandboss and explain that people are alarmed to be told someone was fired for reasons that explicitly had nothing to do with his performance, and that while you appreciate the need for discretion around personnel decisions, without some additional information people will assume they too could be fired without warning and without reason … and so if there is a reason, it would help to share more info with people?

If they expect you to do the work of reassuring people and stopping panicked job hunts, they need to give you the tools to do that with.

is it ageist to tell an older team member they’re wrong?

A reader writes:

When our company went 100% online work, my team and I helped set up 35 employees with hardware in their homes. The department we support is mostly people in their late 20s-early 30s. Two employees, Archie and Edith, both have bad attitudes and break their hardware a lot. I would say a good portion of my staff’s time is spent replacing Archie’s screen for the third time this month or fixing a virus that Edith has spread to the entire department. Don’t get me started on what they do to phones, tablets, and laptops.

I was just notified by our HR officer that both Edith and Archie have filed complaints about one of my staff members because she politely explained a process in a step-by-step email and used the words “that’s not accurate” and the “correct way.” Both Archie and Edith felt that they were being discriminated against and mocked because they’re older than the rest of the team. I read the email and that is 100% not what happened. After they filed their complaint, they sent harassing and abusive texts to my staff member.

They want me to reprimand my team member and sent an email that we all have to complete a sensitivity training and said we can’t use the words “right, accurate, wrong, or incorrect or any version thereof, as some team members find the terms offensive and disrespectful in regards to their age.” I asked them to clarify and HR responded, “Don’t tell anyone older than you they’re wrong, it’s rude and hostile.”

I’m not willing to (1) reprimand my staff for explaining and fixing an error that could have cost our company a lot of money, or (2) let people bully my staff.

I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

Other questions I’m answering there today include:

  • How can we give job applicants an easy way to ask for interview accommodations?
  • Will my lack of poker face stop me from being promoted?

birthday cards are causing mayhem in our office

A reader writes:

I’m a team lead with a ridiculous problem. This January, a coworker who reports to me, Diana, said she thought it would be great if she kept a list of everyone’s birthdays and passed around a birthday card for everyone else to sign and then give to the birthday-haver. She said she has boxes and boxes of cards for all occasions at home, more than she could ever use, and it would be no problem for her to donate those.

I didn’t see it as a huge benefit, but also didn’t see it as a huge issue in terms of the time it would take, so if she wanted to do it, no big deal. I REALLY could not have been more wrong.

The first issue was getting the birthday list. HR wouldn’t just make her a list of our team’s birthdays, so she had to go around and ask people herself. Some are hybrid, some have meetings off-site, so this took longer than it seems like it should. She finally got the list completed, and by that point it was mid-February. So she missed January birthdays. There were only a couple, and one of them joked that he would feel left out, but she promised to get him next year. She then started with the next birthdays, and again getting the cards signed was more work than she or I had thought it would be, due to the same issues she had when getting the list of birth dates. She didn’t start early enough with the first few birthdays and not everyone got to sign, so a few people were upset that they didn’t get a chance to sign and thought it would look like they were snubbing the birthday person. So I suggested she start earlier with the signature-collecting.

This went on for a few months and it was fine. Then, this summer, one of my other reports came to me and said she thought her work bestie, Jill, had been left off the birthday list because her birthday was in a couple of days and Diana hadn’t been around with a card for everyone to sign. It turns out that is exactly what happened; Jill had fallen through the cracks and her birthday wasn’t on Diana’s list. So we scrambled to get a card passed around. Of course it had many less signatures than the others because we only had a couple of days, so that was awkward. Jill asked me to make sure the birthday list was complete. I told her it was Diana’s thing, but I gave Diana that feedback.

A couple of weeks ago, Diana went on vacation. This coincided with a particularly busy time, so I was taking on some of her work and assigned other elements of it to team members. The birthday card thing did not occur to me, and apparently not to her. Well, we missed one, and that coworker, Mary, got kind of upset. She was sniffling in her cubicle one day when I took her some documents and I checked to make sure she was okay. I got a very long story about how her family is across the country, she just broke up with someone, her dog died earlier this year, and her coworkers forgetting her birthday just added to it. She was laughing a bit like she knew it was silly, but I felt bad about it. I didn’t have any birthday cards and I didn’t know where Diana stored them, so when I made a coffee run later, I bought a coffee cake for Mary’s birthday. We all shared it in the break room.

Last week, my manager told me she’d gotten complaints about the uneven birthday acknowledgements and my apparent favoritism of Mary, and how apparently some team members didn’t even get cards. I guess Diana’s list STILL wasn’t complete and no one said anything on those occasions. I told her I would speak to Diana and she said, “Can we just stop this?” I pointed out we had to at least get through the rest of the year (and January!) so everyone got at least one card, or the mood would get even worse. She said some people had already missed cards and this just seemed like a waste of time and resources.

When Diana came back, I passed along this feedback. She said it’s not a waste of resources if she provides the cards, and she doesn’t mind taking the time. I told her that the list was still not complete, and people were getting upset. She sent an email later that day apologizing and asking again for everyone’s birthdays. I feel crazy. My manager wasn’t copied on the email, but I feel like she did tell me to stop the birthday stuff and Diana kept it up. But when I spoke to Diana again, she said she was doing it as a friend of everyone and would only get signatures on her breaks from now on. What can I do, anything? I can’t really police what she does on her break time. But then I am sure I will hear more complaints.

Kill the birthday cards now. Don’t wait for the year to be up. People should get it after reading Diana’s apology, but if they don’t, you can explain it.

As soon as I read your first paragraph, I knew exactly how this was going to play out because this is how it always — well, at least often — plays out unless you have a formal system that’s truly part of someone’s job duties and they’re held accountable to getting it right the way they would be with any other work duty. When someone just does it  informally on the side, it’s super common to miss people and to cause hurt feelings.

On a podcast episode a few years ago, I talked about a time when an employee came to me with the same proposal Diana made to you and I told her no because it was more involved than she realized: I would have to ensure she had a system for making sure she wasn’t leaving anyone out, and for adding new hires to the list, and there would have to be oversight to make sure we weren’t skipping anyone, and someone would need to cover it when she was out and take it over when she left. I’m quite sure she thought I was being ridiculous, but what she saw as an easy feel-good initiative was more of an expenditure of energy what she was picturing. This came up on the podcast in a discussion of times when you have to do something as a manager that might seem silly to an employee because they’re seeing it from a different vantage point, but you have to do it anyway.

So yeah, kill the cards. Explain to Diana that while she intended it as a morale-boosting effort, it’s ended up having the opposite effect on the people who were missed, and that you hadn’t accounted for how much time it would take to organize and get signatures, and that your own boss wants it stopped for those reasons. If she says she doesn’t mind spending the time on it, you should say, “I appreciate that, but given that it’s turned out be more than a few minutes here and there, it’s not something I want you spending your time on anymore.” If she continues to push: “I appreciate where you were coming from — it was a kind idea — but it’s causing too much disruption and my and Jane’s decision is to stop it.”

If Diana says again that she’ll do it on her breaks instead … well, she’s missing the point! You’d need to respond with, “People have the impression that this is an office-sponsored activity, it’s causing drama, and you cannot do it at work anymore. If you choose to give cards outside of work, this history means that it’s highly likely to still be perceived as something ‘from’ the office and lead to more hurt feelings, which would make it a work issue, so I certainly hope you will have the judgment not to continue.”

If this doesn’t settle it, you could say, “Is there something else going on that would help me understand why you feel so strongly about this?”

You can’t let birthdays cause this much drama.

everyone at my new job loves my high school bully, company wants us to pay for a work trip, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Everyone at my new job loves my high school bully

I’m an actor and just started rehearsals for a play. A woman who bullied me terribly in high school is active in my city’s theater community. Luckily, I haven’t run into her as I was busy with college and then lived in a different city for a couple of years. One of my castmates offhandedly mentioned her. I said that I went to high school with her, but obviously did not mention the bullying. The castmate began singing her praises, and others joined in. I thought my heart was going to stop.

I’m nearly 30, but I am not over what she did to me. Without getting into details, she enlisted other students and even a faculty member in her bullying. I began self-harming, attempting suicide, and spent some time in intensive outpatient therapy.

I now have to hear about her almost every night. I can’t say anything about the bullying, because I don’t want to bring up old drama and I don’t want her to find out she still has this effect on me. The show will be over by November, but I don’t know if I can continue like this for that long. I’m physically ill and my work at my day job is slipping. Dropping out isn’t an option. What do you think I should do?

You’ve taken the two most obvious options off the table: saying something or dropping out. If you’re physically ill and it’s affecting your day job, you need to do one of those. Saying something would be the easiest! You don’t need to get into details; you can simply say, “Jane and I have a rough history and it’s messing with my focus to talk about her so frequently — could you not bring her up around me so often?”

Does this sound like there’s A Story and might it make people curious to know what happened? Yes. But that doesn’t need to be your problem. If anyone pries for details, you can say, “I really don’t want to talk about it, it was years ago.” If people wonder, so be it. The alternative is continuing to hear about her all the time.

However … if she’s active in your city’s theater community and you’re going to be part of that community, realistically this is likely to keep coming up. It’s actually pretty weird that they’re bringing her up so frequently — what is so interesting to them about this woman?! — but apparently that’s the situation. So I do think you’ve got to decide if you’re up for remaining active in that community yourself, knowing Jane will be be around/discussed, or whether you’d rather disengage. And that sucks! You should be able to participate in community theater if you want to. But those are probably the choices. I’m sorry you’re dealing with this.

Also, would it help to check in with a therapist for a few sessions, given the impact this is having on your quality of life? I imagine it might be awfully demoralizing to think you’re once again having to seek therapy because of Jane, but we’re talking about something that’s making you physically ill and affecting your job.

If all of this sounds like too much to bother to deal with, I’d honestly consider quitting the play. I know you said it’s not an option, but it would presumably be an option if you had something else health-related going on, right? (There too, I imagine it might be demoralizing to feel like you have to quit something all these years later because of Jane, but you really don’t need to just power through.)

2. My employee is bad at communicating

I am moving into a management position for the first time in many years. The last time I had a direct report, it was a disaster. My current direct report is great — he’s enthusiastic and a quick learner. This is also his first job out of college so it’s a big learning curve. And I really, really don’t want to mess up managing again!

So far the only issue I’ve encountered is a communication issue. When he’s speaking to me, I often find it hard to get a handle on what he’s trying to say, and end up having to ask a lot of questions so I can nail down the information.

For example, he will use the word “they” to refer to multiple individuals in a conversation, so I have to keep asking him which of the various people involved he’s referring to, or he’ll send Teams messages that are vague. The other day, he sent me a Teams message the other day about a technical issue during a presentation that said, “I keep seeing my messages” when what he meant was that his Teams notifications were popping up during a shared screen and he didn’t know how to turn them off.

I want to give him some constructive feedback, but saying “get better at communicating” doesn’t seem specific or actionable enough. Ideally, I’d like to be able to grasp what he’s saying without having to ask a lot of clarifying questions. Do you have any advice for how to address this, or any advice for a new manager who really, really wants to be a good manager?

The next time it happens, name it in the moment and ask clearly for what you want him to do differently. So for example, the next time he’s using “they” to refer to multiple people, say, “You’re saying ’they’ for a bunch of different people and I don’t know who you’re referencing. Can you make a point of using each person’s name, not just now but in all the time? It’ll make conversations easier to follow.” (I wonder if you’ve hesitated to say that because it’s so basic that it might feel condescending — but the fact is, what he’s doing is a problem and there’s no other way to get him to change it.) You can also name the pattern itself: “You sometimes send me messages without giving me enough background to know the context. For example, X and Y. Can you make a point of including a couple of sentences of context when you message me so that I have the background on what we’re talking about?”

More broadly: I don’t know what the management disaster was last time, but make sure you’ve reflected on whatever happened, identified what you should have done differently, and internalized those lessons. There’s also tons of help available for new managers if you seek out it! Weirdly, companies don’t always offer much support to new managers, but there’s guidance out there if you look for it. Ideally you’d have a more experienced manager as a mentor to bounce things off of, but there are books, classes, articles… Here’s one starting place.

3. Company wants us to pay for a work trip

Every year my company hosts a company trip for partners in the company (it’s a start-up, so a majority of employees were offered partnership).

This is my first year being invited to attend. We got a group “discount” at the recommended hotel the meetings will be held in and a $100 reimbursement. Alison, I’m at the admin level, I can’t feasibly drop $700 for a weekend and have to use a day of PTO to ensure I get there on a Friday. It’s optional to go, but we are HEAVILY encouraged and repeatedly asked to attend. After I pushed back, they finally booked the rooms for us and offered a partial work day to head out to the destination. But even then it’s still expensive, and they are refusing work from home. We also are attending work sessions that we are not going to be paid for under the guise that it’s strategic planning.

Am I crazy in thinking they should do more to cover our costs? Or do companies really just pay for rooms and everything else you cover?

Let me get this straight: They’re heavily pressuring you to attend a work trip but expecting you to pay for your own hotel (minus their contribution of $100) and use PTO to travel to it? And then while you’re there, it won’t count as work time?

Lol no. That’s utterly ridiculous.

Employers are expected to pay the cost of business travel (hotel and transportation at a minimum, and ideally meals as well), your travel time shouldn’t come out of PTO, and if you’re non-exempt you need to be paid for the work sessions that happen on the trip. That last part is federal law; it’s not up to them.

If the trip were both optional and purely recreational (like a reward where you weren’t expected to do any work), this would still be pretty stingy. The fact that it’s an actual work trip and you’re being pressured to go moves this into the realm of outrageous.

What happens if you say, “I’d like to go but I can’t afford the expenses or the PTO”?

4. How do I get out of some of these meetings?

My calendar is filling up with 1:1 check-ins with people not in my vertical. These check-ins started as a way to collaborate more in our remote jobs, and often they are helpful. But I think it’s taking over my week a little too much and I’m constantly struggling to find focus time. I think it would be helpful to reduce cadence on a few of these check-ins but it’s hard to tell people “I want to meet with you less!” Do you have a suggestion on how to ask this diplomatically?

“I’ve been slammed lately and need to carve out more time for project work (or “to meet some deadlines” or whatever makes sense in your context). Can we change the cadence of our meetings to ___?” (Fill in the blank with monthly, every other week, as needed, or whatever makes sense.) Hell, you can even say, “I urgently need to carve out some space on my calendar over the next few weeks. Can we put our check-ins on hold for now?”

5. Did I mess up by referring to a “suspended” hiring process?

I recently had a great first interview with an in-house recruiter for a role I am really excited about. The recruiter told me that she would be moving me to the next step and that I would hear from her within the next week. After two weeks, I sent a brief, polite follow-up email just to check in and see if there were any updates.

The recruiter wrote back saying that they had several recruitment processes going on and they were “unable to progress any further for now” with recruitment for the role in question. I replied that I was sorry to hear that the process had been suspended, but I was still excited about the opportunity and asked her to please get back in touch when they were ready to restart.

She responded that the process was not suspended, it was ongoing, they just couldn’t move as quickly. This directly contradicted her first message and the tone suggested that I’d offended her. I fired back a quick apology and reiterated that I would love to hear from her when they’re ready.

Did I screw up? Is “suspended” a dirty word? It seemed accurate in response to her first message. Do I need to do more to fix this?

“Suspended” isn’t a dirty word and I doubt you offended the recruiter or misstepped. She was simply clarifying that they’re not stopping recruitment; it’s just slowing way down / is on the back burner as a priority right now. There’s nothing to fix; all is fine.

my coworker is upset that I didn’t tell her I’m pregnant

A reader writes:

I am just a few weeks pregnant (and not showing at all). I have only told the few people at work who need to know, as I’ve had a rocky first trimester and needed some time to deal with pretty terrible morning sickness. The people who know are as follows: my boss, HR, my friend who shares my office with me and has seen me rush out of the room to go throw up, and another colleague who is a close family friend.

Two weeks ago, the office busybody, Roberta, bustled into my office demanding, “Why didn’t you TELL me?” over and over again, complete with wiggling her eyebrows knowingly. I played dumb and asked, “Tell you what, exactly?” until she finally said, “That you’re pregnant!” I said that I wasn’t really telling people yet, and I was confused as to who told her. She insisted it was fine to tell her, and I kept insisting that I wasn’t telling people yet and that I would like to know why she knows. We went around like this for a bit until she said congratulations and left in a bit of a huff.

I found out later that she knows because the person at the front desk overheard someone else talking about it and decided to bring it up when she and Roberta were talking about stocking the bathroom with menstruation pads and she joked that I “clearly wouldn’t be needing them.” (A whole other level of weird, in my opinion!)

It’s been a few weeks now and Roberta will not look at me or talk to me about anything, work-related or otherwise. I think she’s offended that she wasn’t told I was pregnant, but … am I right in thinking that’s my private medical information? I wasn’t even past the first trimester yet, and I know people generally hold off on announcing it until then.

I’m wondering how to navigate this situation, and if I need to talk with her directly about her (or my?) behavior? Could I have done something differently?

If this impacts the situation at all, she’s older than I am (baby boomer to my millennial), and she’s overly gossipy and tends to heavily comment on other’s bodies and appearances in a way I find uncomfortable. Thus, I have a polite but distant relationship with her — more of a distant acquaintance than a close work friend. I didn’t want to tell her I was pregnant at all — and certainly not this early! — given these issues. I also don’t really want to focus on my pregnancy at work, but on my work, which I think is fairly reasonable.

You are not wrong in any way. Roberta was out of line in laying claim to your news in the first place, and even more out of line in acting offended around you now.

It’s reasonable and normal not to share pregnancy news at work (or anywhere) until you’re ready to — whether that means past your first trimester or something else. Colleagues aren’t entitled to know about your pregnancy until things are at the point where you need to discuss plans for your leave. The first trimester is not that point.

My guess is that Roberta’s side of this would sound something like, “I heard she was pregnant and was excited and wanted to congratulate her, but she wouldn’t accept my good wishes and just demanded to know how I knew.” She probably did genuinely feel hurt by that; the most generous reading is that she thought she was going to have a warm moment of connection with you and got rebuffed. But that doesn’t make her in the right; she’s still 100% in the wrong, both for violating your privacy and demanding you share personal info with her, and for getting affronted when you tried to maintain a reasonable boundary. If she feels embarrassed or hurt, that’s something she needs to deal with privately. Instead she’s making it into your problem by acting as if you offended her.

As for what to do, you have a few options.

First, how much does it affect your work that she won’t speak to you? If there’s no real impact on your work, you could choose to ignore what she’s doing and figure it’s her problem, not yours.

But if it’s affecting your work, ignoring it isn’t an option. In that case, you could talk to her directly, approaching it as, “It seems like you haven’t been talking to me since you asked if I was pregnant, and I do need you to talk to me about things like XYZ so I can get my work done.”

Alternately, you could loop in your boss, because a colleague refusing to discuss work with you is Not Okay. Ideally you’d attempt to talk to Roberta directly first — both because that might solve it and because if it doesn’t, it’ll be useful to tell your boss you’ve tried. But if she keeps freezing you out, it’s a work issue that your boss needs to know about. (Also, based on how Roberta is handling this, I’m betting you’re not the only colleague she has trouble working with.)

my job interview went great — why haven’t I heard back?

You walked out of your job interview feeling great – you clicked with your interviewer, nailed every question, ticked all their boxes. They seemed impressed and excited to work with you, and you were sure an offer was in your near future. But since then … nothing. Maybe your interviewer even assured you that you’d hear from them within a week or two, but now twice that amount of time has passed and they still haven’t made contact. What is going on?!

In a decade and a half of writing a work advice column, I’ve received more letters about this experience than probably any other. It’s incredibly common to have what seems like a truly great job interview only to never hear from the employer again – even in cases where you were promised that you would within a specific time frame.

I wrote about it today at New York Magazine, including why employers leave candidates hanging and what to do in the face of silence. You can read it here.

I can’t travel because my cat is sick — and my boss and coworkers are unhappy

A reader writes:

I joined my employer earlier this year as the only fully remote worker. At my first on-site, the only other coworkers in my department resigned. Instead of being the junior member of a small remote team as I expected, I was suddenly THE team. The CEO told me that day that he’d want me to travel to the home office once a month, and I was still so shocked I gave a non-committal answer like, “Well, if it’s for something important.” During the interviews, we had only discussed “some” travel.

I took possession of my childhood cat (age 16) at the beginning of June from my aging parents. He was healthy, but by mid-June, he showed symptoms that last week we found out is severe and chronic pancreatitis. His treatment plan includes once a week injections, 2-3 times a week fluids, twice daily pills and ointments, and a lot of hand feeding all day, every day. Almost all of these are a two-person job (bless my fiancé!). He has a chance of full recovery, but could also pass anytime.

The adjustment to remote work with my boss has been rough already, with limited communication from either side (my bad!). I ducked out of a July event for the first emergency appointment and an event tomorrow due to his new treatment plan (the org lost no money on plane tickets or hotel). I made one conference in August, but things went poorly while I was away. This time, my boss expressed displeasure and told me to find a way to attend “if at all possible” and to “heck, take the cat with you.” I don’t feel I can stick all of this care on my fiancé, even if either of us could do it independently.

I had a meeting today to finalize a large project. A coworker was early and started by saying he was disappointed that I wouldn’t be at the event tomorrow, that he didn’t see a pet as a valid excuse and didn’t believe me, he wasn’t a pet person, and in the army this would be called a “personal problem.” I was ruder than I should have been, but I was taken aback and said I could always ask the vet to send him a note and that if my boss felt the same way as him, the boss is free to talk to me about it.

My coworker said it in a semi-joking tone and seemed to get more serious when I expressed my regret about missing the event and explained the treatments — but he should not have known about the cat unless he’s been talking to my boss, he has no standing to reprimand me, and I felt disrespected and gossiped about. My boss came in and said that he was disappointed I wasn’t calling in on my way to the airport, then jumped in. I also made clear later in the call that I wouldn’t be committing to travel until this cat resolves his illness or passes.

How do I address this with my boss while giving my pet the best shot I can? Did I just take a joke too harshly? Is a pet’s illness a legitimate family issue to miss travel for? What do I do from here? They can’t see me working every day and want to bridge the gap through regular travel, and I can see why they thought I was on board. But I felt pressured into that existing agreement, I feel disrespected and distrusted, and I think my travel schedule is being gossiped about and potentially damaging my relationship with other coworkers. If it’s a performance conversation, I’m happy to have one — but with my boss, not my coworkers.

This is tricky. You signed up for a job that was supposed to involve “some” travel, and then the needs of the job changed soon after you started. You’re entitled to say, “Hey, this isn’t what we agreed to when I was hired and it’s not something I can do.”

At the same time, they’re allowed to decide that the needs of the job have changed and that they do need someone in your role who can travel more than what was originally discussed. That wouldn’t necessarily be fair, but it does happen sometimes. They’d also be on solid ground in pointing out that you did agree to “some” travel when you were hired, and they’re not being unreasonable in expecting you to adhere to that.

It’s also true that declining to do work travel in order to care for a pet isn’t seen the way that declining because of child care would be. If you were saying, “I’m the single parent of a toddler and can’t travel more than once or twice a year,” it would likely be going over differently. We can debate whether or not that should be the case, but it’s the reality in many offices.

To me, this hinges on what “some” travel meant when you agreed to that originally. It sounds like the monthly trips to the home office are a new expectation, but what about the events and conferences that you’ve been missing? If those were always understood to be part of the role, even before your coworkers quit, this gets a lot harder to resolve.

But also, what does it mean that you’re now THE team, with no other team members? Are they hiring to fill those roles so this is temporary? Or is the plan to keep you a department of one, and the only person responsible for all the travel that needs to be done?

The other complicating factor: When you’re the only remote worker on a team, it’s really important that you go out of your way to be visible, accessible, and available. You said you weren’t communicating enough in the beginning, and that’s probably making this harder. When you’re a known quantity who’s in frequent communication, people are often more willing to accommodate you when you need it (whereas when they don’t feel connected to you, the opposite can be true).

So, where does all this leave you? I think you need to have a straightforward conversation with your boss to clarify the travel expectations and what you can and can’t commit to, and figure out if the role can still work for both of you (and also ideally resolve the question of whether the situation will change when/if they replace the coworkers who left). You should do this soon, because your boss is telling you pretty forthrightly that he’s unhappy with how things stand now.

I don’t think you can take for granted they’ll accept “I can’t travel at all (or much) because of my cat” for a job that they told you from the start would involve some travel. Some managers might! But a lot of managers wouldn’t, especially for a new employee (as opposed to if you’d been working for them for years before your situation changed). I also don’t think you can expect people not to talk about it. Someone on the team being unable to travel for what people may not see as a “good enough” reason is something that’s likely to get discussed, and there’s no point in spending capital or energy being upset about that.

This situation sucks and it isn’t your fault. You’re trying to save your cat! But I think you’ve got to have an air-clearing conversation with your boss and figure out what will and won’t work.

I hope your cat is okay.

my boss won’t do anything about my lazy team mate, client said I can’t talk to my coworker, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss won’t do anything about my lazy coworker

I’ve worked for 14 years as an individual contributor on a team of six technologists. We split the day-to-day work evenly amongst ourselves, and are all used to having to take on a bit more if someone calls in sick or something along those lines … we all just push through and it gets done.

What is there to be done about a coworker who is clearly not doing their share due to obvious time mismanagement? One of my fellow techs, William, wanders in anywhere from 10-25 minutes late almost every morning (often with a drive-through coffee in his hand). He frequently takes much longer breaks than we are allowed, and I often observe him wasting time chatting with other colleagues and hiding in corners of the office playing on his cell phone. I have kept track, and this often amounts to a couple of hours per day.

Our supervisor, Thomas, has had many meetings with all six of us in which he clearly lays out his expectations regarding personal chit chat, timeliness, cell phone use, etc. But William doesn’t seem to care. He continues to blatantly disregard expectations, and when called out on it (usually by me, always in a calm, professional manner, referencing the expectations previously laid out by Thomas), his response is to give me the silent treatment, sometimes for days on end, only speaking to me in monosyllables when it’s absolutely necessary. When I bring this up to Thomas (the behaviors I’ve observed, and the subsequent freeze-outs), the only answer I get is something wishy washy along the lines of, “I’m keeping an eye on it.”

I genuinely like my work aside from this, and I care about doing a good job every day and being honest about how I spend my time, so it’s disheartening to see William continually allowed to put in far less effort than the rest of us, with no apparent consequences. What, if anything, can I do? I’d be so grateful for any insight you can provide, even if it’s just a reality check that this is sometimes just the way things are.

This is indeed sometimes just the way things are.

But the reason they’re this way is because your boss sucks. I suppose it’s possible that he’s managing William more actively behind the scenes and you just don’t know about it, but I doubt it given that the problems are continuing, and since Thomas apparently thinks the way to “manage” William is to have group meetings rather than correct William one-on-one. Thomas sounds like a wimp who doesn’t want to address issues with William directly so instead is choosing the weakest possible management approach.

William sucks, but Thomas sucks more.

Related:
my boss sends scolding emails to all of us — and then tells me I shouldn’t take them personally

2. My coworker shared a colleague’s personal info with me

I’m a woman in my 30s working in state government in an upper admin-type role. Our office is great in that we are a strong team and folks enjoy each other’s company, but there isn’t a “we’re family” vibe. We have quite a few men with a common first name, let’s say John.

My coworker Carol is relatively senior in terms of job title, but not my boss. We have a cordial relationship but are not “work friends.” Carol has previously made it clear to the office that it is very important to her that we know when her birthday is and celebrate it.

Last week, I was getting my lunch ready in the kitchen and Carol walked in. We exchange greetings and then she asks me, “So, did we do anything for John?” I’m wracking my brain trying to figure out which John she’s referring to. It can’t be the one who just lost a family member, because his team already organized a condolence card for him, so who could it be?

I must have looked confused, so she clarified, “You know, his dad and the accident. I just thought we should do something.” I told her that I didn’t know what she was talking about, and she said she saw us chatting yesterday, so she thought she’d ask. Now I know which John she’s talking about, but I still have no idea why she thinks I would know about this. John works in a different department, and while we do have a friendly work relationship, we mostly talk about our mutual hobbies and interests, not personal stuff.

I asked another coworker who is usually in the know about these things, and she also had no idea, so I decided to just ask John. I made it clear that this might be a weird question and awkwardly asked if everything was okay with his family. He looked taken aback but explained that yes, his dad was in a bad accident a month ago but is doing very well now. He was gracious about it and I apologized repeatedly and explained that Carol had said something, which he looked annoyed about. He said he’d specifically not told many folks at work because he needed work to be an escape from that stress.

I think that my working relationship with John is still okay, but I’m very annoyed with Carol. If someone shares that sort of thing with you in confidence, you shouldn’t go blabbing it to the rest of the office, let alone a different department! And asking me (admin) if we’ve “done anything” (undertone: “you should do something”) when she (not admin) could very well have organized something herself was annoying.

I don’t know if this is just a different understanding of what a workplace and workplace relationships are, but I don’t expect anyone but (maybe) my closest coworkers to celebrate my birthday or share condolences about a difficult family situation. Am I off-base here? Would appreciate any advice/criticism, either on how I handled the situation or how I could handle future interactions with Carol.

Nah, you’re not off-base. But most of this sounds like it could have simply been miscommunication; if John didn’t make it clear to Carol that he didn’t want the info shared, she may not have realized it. Possibly she should have! But that’s between her and John.

She was wrong to imply you should organize something when you’re not on John’s team, and I’d make a mental note not to share anything with Carol that you don’t want repeated, but otherwise I wouldn’t worry much about any of this.

About your broader question about the way she sees relationships at work versus the way you do: as long as she’s not pressuring other people to do things they don’t want to do (like pushing people to celebrate their own birthdays at work if they don’t want to), I’d mark this all down to people just falling in different places on the spectrum of how they like to connect with colleagues.

3. Getting a degree from a nationally accredited school

I am a 34-year-old single mom who has spent years and over $80k trying to obtain a degree. Unfortunately, I’ve made every possible mistake — transferred schools four times, changed my major multiple times, and dropped out due to financial and life challenges.

Earning a degree is still a bucket list item for me, but with $80k in debt and no degree, the financial burden feels overwhelming. I recently came across an affordable, nonprofit online school called University of the People, where classes cost just $100 each. I could complete a business administration degree, which is exactly what I need for career advancement, and I can definitely afford it.

However, it looks like this school is nationally accredited, rather than regionally accredited. How much are employers going to care that the degree is nationally accredited?

First, for readers who don’t know, regional accreditors generally have much more rigorous standards than national accreditors, and a lot of crappy for-profit schools are nationally accredited because they can’t get regionally accredited.

To your question: It’s less that employers will look up whether a school is regionally or nationally accredited and more that the school itself doesn’t have a strong reputation. (Although it’s at least nonprofit, which is a plus!)

If you just need the degree for box-checking purposes (like if your company won’t promote you beyond a certain level without a degree), it will probably be fine. If you’re hoping it will carry the same weight as a degree from a more traditional school (in terms of academic rigor and general reputation), it won’t. So it really depends on what your reason are for pursuing the degree.

Related:
do employers really care where you went to school?

4. Client said I can’t talk to my coworker

I am a project manager who implements healthcare software with clients around the country.

One client has contracted an internal employee of my company (a coworker of mine) to assist them since two client staff members quit during the first week of the software launching. (I am not surprised given that the client is rude, demanding, and has staff that are not kind to each other.) I met with my coworker one-on-one to see how it was going. I myself have had a rough patch with this client and wanted to make sure that they were not being aggressive and outlandish in their requests.

Well, the client found out I met with my coworker without them there, and they are now saying I cannot meet with her to discuss anything with her without them. I stated that I wanted the coworker to have an opportunity to speak openly about how it was going for her. The client then replied back that if the coworker had questions/concerns, she should bring it up to them.

Was I out of line for checking with the coworker on her experience so far? I wanted to just gather how it was going for her from a project perspective.

It’s completely normal for people within an organization to meet to talk about how work is going, and clients can’t dictate that that not happen (unless it’s confidential work where each person involved in the project needs to be specially cleared, but that doesn’t sound like the case here). The inner workings of your company are none of their business. Are they also going to say her manager can’t check in with her about her work on their project?

Practically speaking, you and your coworker should just not mention future conversations to the client, but this is weird.

5. My employer wants me to pay for a separate phone so they can reach me at night

My employer has recently begun demanding I keep my cell on 24/7 in case they need me to cover reception in an emergency. We do not have emergency matters, just the receptionist might call in sick.

I have declined to keep my phone on so it doesn’t ping me at all hours, which happens because of auto reminders from doctors and texts from family and friends three time zones ahead. I said I would hold a phone from my employer.

My employer is insisting on taking my WFH stipend, or my money, to cover the cost for an excessive phone and plan of their choosing. This is apparently all illegal in my state (California). How do I respond without getting fired and without having to use my funds to pay their bills?

California does indeed have a law that employers must reimburse all business expenses and can’t ask employees to shoulder them. So you could simply say, “We could get in trouble under California law for that, since the state requires employers to cover business expenses, including phones.”

The WFH stipend might complicate this, depending on exactly how that’s structured; it’s possible this could legally fall under the expenses that the stipend should cover (although based on your letter, I’m skeptical that it would; you could check with a lawyer in your state if you want to be sure).

The other option, if you don’t feel like dealing with this, is just to set the number they’d be calling from to emergency bypass so it rings through even if you have Do Not Disturb on. You shouldn’t have to do that (and it will only work if you program in all the possible numbers they might call from), but it’s an option.

Related:
what to do when your employer is breaking the law

my “empath” coworker is kind of a jerk

A reader writes:

For about half a year now, I’ve had a colleague (let’s call him Dave) who has a few strange quirks. He tends to look for my reaction at a lot of things other people say, and then comment on the way I react. For example: another coworker or my boss makes a joke and I laugh (while others are laughing too) and Dave looks at me, points and says, “Oh, you sure are laughing” or ‘“Look how hard Jane is laughing.” Honestly it makes me very self-conscious about smiling/laughing in the office, even though before that I was really happy/felt lucky that we had such a jovial, fun environment to work in.

He also has some other quirks such as never washing his dishes (to the point we have to put his coffee in a paper cup instead of a glass one, because he will leave dishes to literally rot on his desk) and making mean-spirited jokes about my boss, who is currently going through cancer treatment. (Not that it would be fine if he wasn’t going through cancer treatment, but it just feels like he’s kicking him when he’s down.)

On top of this, Dave recently “came out” as an empath. He explained that it meant that he feels emotions much more deeply than other people do and thus gets overwhelmed easily. He is absent very often due to things such as not having slept well or having a cold, things other people still come in for.

Is there anything I could possibly do to make him stop making these comments without making the office an uncomfortable place to be in? Should I tell my boss or grandboss about these things I’ve noticed? Or should I just let it be? He’s very chatty, so I’ve had to have headphones in almost constantly during work, which in turn makes it harder to quickly communicate with coworkers.

There is also a chance I am just overreacting or don’t understand it. Full disclosure, I am autistic, so I don’t really understand a lot of social norms. Anyhow, thank you.

Ugh, Dave. I think you’re understanding him just fine. He sounds like a garden-variety jerk whose image of himself (as an empath!) doesn’t fit his actual behavior.

I wonder if you can use his “empath” self-image to get him to stop commenting on your reactions to things. For example: “I know you’ve mentioned you’re empathetic and care a lot about people’s feelings, so can I ask you to stop commenting on my laughing or other reactions I have? It makes me self-conscious, which I know you don’t want to do.”

And when he makes a mean-spirited joke about your boss, feel free to let your response illustrate how it’s landing:
* “Ouch, that was mean.”
* “Whoa, that’s not deserved.”
* “Yikes.”

For what it’s worth, “empath” is generally used to mean someone who has a higher degree of sensitivity to the emotions of others. It doesn’t mean “colds and lack of sleep are harder on me than they are on other people.” It also doesn’t mean “I feel my own emotions much more deeply than other people do.” If anything, it sounds like Dave might be the opposite of an empath.