boss says it’s unacceptable not to meet all deadlines, no matter how unreasonable by Alison Green on February 3, 2025 A reader writes: I started a job eight months ago that I was very excited about. I was looking to get out of a highly stressful position and got this offer (same pay, somewhat worse benefits but growth potential) and what I thought would be a solid work-life balance. The first day, my boss mentioned how we typically end at 4:30. I’m used to working long hours so I was excited, thinking I’d have more time with my two small kids and husband. I was very wrong. The first couple months were good and then “efficiency” became a big part of conversation. I was asked why reviewing a report would take me 15 minutes and could I get it down to 10? We also lost two people in our department and did not replace them while also being told we were no longer “outsourcing” any of our work. My colleague and I took it in stride and tried to be team players. Six months later, I’m working from 9 am until 9-11 pm every night or later. Before going out of office, I’ve worked until 1am and still been told I had too many items “outstanding” and it’s unacceptable to leave without all my work completely finished (which is not always possible when I’m awaiting responses from several people for info I’ve been following up for). This all came to a head when my colleague and I both got really ill. We live in the same area and cold/flu was going around; my kids got it too. We were told we could take a sick day but all our deadlines still needed to be met. So, we couldn’t take one since that wasn’t possible, and we worked through it despite 102 fevers and both losing our voices entirely. Now more and more work is being piled on. I haven’t ended before 9-11 pm in months and the burn-out is affecting my performance and physical and mental health. The stress keeps me up. I also feel like a terrible mom as I never get to spend an evening with my family, my husband is frustrated he never sees me at night, and my colleague is about to quit. But I have a family and I need this income. We’ve brought it up to my manager and another higher-up, who say that we’re not being efficient enough and they’d love for us to finish on time but its not acceptable to log off/take PTO/a sick day if the work is not done. Despite not having experience in our day to day, they also say this workload should be manageable. Is there a solution here? I’m a yes person and I realize I could have set better boundaries but in a new job I wanted to start strong. I’m outputting a ridiculous amount of work but it’s never enough. You need to quit this job, because your company is abusing and exploiting you. It’s one thing to expect people to pitch in and work (some) extra hours for a short-term, high-needs period. It is not reasonable to expect that as a routine way of operating, let alone daily — at least not unless people were clearly told of that expectation before they signed on and are being compensated accordingly. The idea that it’s unacceptable to leave until all your work is done, even if that means staying past 1 am, is absurd. So is the idea that you can’t take sick days when you’re sick if there’s work waiting to be done. That’s not how jobs work. If they want to end each day with no outstanding work remaining, they need to hire the correct number of people to make that happen, not expect you and your colleague to work around the clock so they can avoid paying what that actually costs. (Oh, they don’t want to pay what that would cost? Well, neither do you — but right now you’re the one paying it via your time and health.) You said you and your coworker wanted to be “team players,” but your company doesn’t seem like they’re on your team; you’re giving them far, far more than they’re giving you, and they’re happy to just keep taking unfairly, no matter the cost to you. That’s not the sort of team you want to play on. Frankly, this is bad enough that you should consider quitting immediately (and explaining that during your notice period you’ll only be able to work the 40 hours per week that you agreed to when you came on board). If that’s not possible financially, then you need to go all-out on a job search because this isn’t okay or sustainable. Meanwhile, while you’re stuck there, you need to set boundaries on your time. Tell your boss that your situation at home has changed and effective immediately you need to work the hours you were promised when you accepted the job. I strongly, strongly suggest you talk to your colleague and get her onboard with this plan too (because you’ll have more power standing as a team, and because she deserves it too, and also so that your work doesn’t just get piled on her). Obviously, your boss won’t like this. You’ll probably be told you need to keep working late hours. The words to use in response are: “I was able to help out in a pinch, but I’m not able to work 14+-hour days anymore. When I was hired, we agreed I should 40-hour weeks on average, and the salary I’m being paid reflects a 40-hour week. I’ve gone above and beyond to help out after we lost two people, but this is affecting my health and my family and I need to return to normal hours.” Is there a danger that they’ll fire you for daring to set utterly reasonable boundaries? Yes. (If that happens, you’ll be eligible for unemployment, which I know is likely cold comfort, but it’s worth factoring into your thinking.) But right now you’re being badly mistreated, have been thrust into a situation you never agreed to, and it’s affecting your health — and I would bet that if you calculate the actual hourly wage you’re receiving for those 70-hour weeks, that will help illustrate how bad this is. And while yes, putting your foot down is a risk, if you don’t do it, your company will simply keep expecting this of you and you’ll be in this same situation six months from now, or a year from now. The only way out is to say no. You may also like:my boss is overloading me with work during my notice periodsince I gave notice at work, my boss has tripled my workloadI've been overworked for months and my manager won't help { 286 comments }
I accidentally peed on a fabric chair at work, why have policies that aren’t enforced, and more by Alison Green on February 3, 2025 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. I accidentally peed on a fabric chair at work I’m close to tears writing this. I was drinking some water at my desk and some of it went down the wrong tube, which led to a coughing fit. I coughed so hard that I peed. This is the first time this has ever happened and I’m mortified. Worse still, it happed on a specially ordered orthopedic chair with a cloth seat. And yes, the urine soak through. What do I do?!? I’m afraid if I tell my manger they’ll be horrified and wonder how I could possibly be incontinent. I don’t want to be the coworker who peed on the chair. Will I totally ruin my professional image? As much as I just want to not tell anyone I don’t think the chair is salvageable and it stinks of urine now. Someone is bound to notice. Do I have to change my name and live life as a hermit? Help! You do not have to change your name and live as a hermit! You are a normal human with a normal human body, and normal human bodies sometimes do weird things. You are far from the only person who has had this happen. (Here are some other letters with similar stories if it helps!) Anyone who would hold this against you is a jerk; most people will just be sympathetic. (In fact, it’s entirely possible your manager or whoever you end up talking to about it will have had something similar happen to themselves at some point.) Talk to the person who’s in charge of ordering furniture and say this: “I had a medical incident that unfortunately ruined the cloth seat of my chair, and I need to order a new one. What’s the process for doing that?” 2. Why have policies that aren’t enforced? Having seen this in real life and reading about it frequently in your column, I’m curious: from a manager’s point of view, what’s the purpose of policies that aren’t enforced and when there’s no intent to enforce them? Why have these policies at all? Obviously sometimes policies are made at a high level that’s detached from everyday operations, and managers don’t care about them, and no one will really notice they’re not enforced. But in situations where managers do have meaningful authority, what’s this all about? This could be dress codes, WFH vs working in the office, timeliness or absenteeism, or any kinds of procedures — situations where there’s a definite rule, something a manager says must or must not be done, but they openly ignore when the rules aren’t followed or refuse to enforce them. Affected underlings sometimes have cynical interpretations of what’s going on here, but I’m curious what the people with authority think they’re doing. There’s a bunch of explanations. Sometimes the policy was made by someone other than the manager and they don’t agree with it, or don’t think it’s a big enough deal to enforce (and may think it’s counter to more important goals, like treating good employees well). Sometimes the policy sounded right when it was made but has turned out not to be a big enough deal for anyone to bother enforcing it, and no one has gone back to revisit it. Sometimes they really should be enforcing it, but the manager is too wimpy or too negligent (those are the same thing, really) to do it. Sometimes the policy wasn’t thought out well enough and so it doesn’t contain the nuance that the manager has in their head — for example, a manager might think “I need people to do X except in situations Y or Z” but they don’t bother to call out Y or Z as exceptions in the policy, so it looks like the policy is just going unenforced (or worse, being inconsistently enforced), whereas if they’d written the policy better their intent would have been clear. And sometimes there’s more of a cumulative aspect to it — if you break the policy once or twice, it’s not a big deal, but if you’re breaking it all the time it’ll be more of a problem and worth addressing. Related: how strictly should managers enforce company policies? 3. My manager’s brain injury is causing problems on our team My supervisor had a traumatic brain injury 11 months ago (workman’s comp). She has gotten treatment (sort of); she is very religious and delayed treatment based on her religious beliefs. After nearly a year, she is still out a lot, has memory issues, is late, is irritable, works remotely a lot, and has accommodations that — at least to our staff — are mysterious and undefined. Early on I stepped up, worked extra, helped out and went the extra mile. We had been friends before working together. Then about six months ago, she bit my head off, told me I had overstepped, and told me to stay in my lane. Fine — I went back to working my actual job and minding my own business. But she is clearly not okay. Now she flip flops between “I feel like we are estranged friends” and asking weird things like wanting to give me her password for a software program, which is strictly prohibited by institution policy. I am at my wits’ end. This is above your pay grade to solve! Please talk to HR about what’s going on. Not to get your manager in trouble, but because these are problems that you can’t handle on your own, and someone above you needs to know what’s going on so they can step in and help (which could include coming up with more effective accommodations, connecting her with different support, changing the way your team is managed, or all sorts of other things). 4. Technology stipend purchases — my property or the company’s? Two years ago I accepted a job that advertised, under the “Compensation and Perks” section of the job posting and official job description, a $1,500 technology stipend. In our negotiation emails, the owner of the firm said that the salary offer plus my professional development budget plus this technology budget “pushes you over (desired salary) for the year, with lots of room for upward mobility. Plus when you earn X certification, you’ll be eligible for a $5,000 raise.” I assumed — based on this correspondence and my spouse’s previous experiences with technology stipends — that I would have a budget of $1,500 to spend on whatever I wanted for tech for my home office, and that it would be mine to keep. There was no mention of returning the purchases at any point. And I did spend it on whatever I wanted (no instructions or guidance provided by the employer), which was a laptop, monitor, ergonomic keyboard and mouse, and some other smaller things specific to my home office. I submitted receipts for reimbursement. Fast forward to last month, when I gave notice. The owner of the firm was very upset. He said many inappropriate and rude things to me, but what he did not say then, during my exit interview, or on my last day, was anything at all about returning the items I’d purchased two years earlier with this stipend. And I didn’t think anything of it, because I was under the impression that this stipend had been compensation. My final paycheck had an error in it that shorted me about $150. It was a mistake due to negligence, not anything malicious, so after trying to resolve it with the payroll company directly, I reached out to my former employer because apparently only he can remedy the mistake. A month later, I checked back in to ask if he’d seen my email, and he replied quickly to say that he wants me to mail him my laptop and monitor, and then once he receives it he’ll Venmo me (?!) the mistakenly withheld wages plus the shipping costs. I don’t even know how to reply. It seems retaliatory for him to be asking for this now (why didn’t he mention it literally at any point earlier?) and it doesn’t match my understanding of the stipend’s terms (which of course aren’t written down anywhere). Not to mention that Venmo’ing me seems like a weird thing to do — the $150 is supposed to be taxable income. What do you think? Is it worth even pointing out to him that he’d offered the stipend to me as part of my compensation package? Would it be egregious to tell him that I’m unwilling to handle the packaging and front the postage costs myself, but if he sends me packaging with prepaid labels I’ll send the items back? Some companies with technology stipends do require the items to be returned when you leave, but they clearly spell that out so you know. I suspect that is not how your manager intended it since if the plan was for you to return the items all along, it wouldn’t have made any sense to include it in “pushing your salary over $X” (just like you don’t include the cost of other work-provided equipment in your salary calculations). Plus he didn’t say anything about returning it until you asked him to remedy the payroll error and when he was already upset about you leaving. You could reply to him, “My understanding from our negotiations when I was hired was that the stipend was part of my compensation, and there was no discussion of those items being returned. If you documented something different, I am happy to take a look at it (although would then ask that you prepay for the shipping back so that I’m not covering that myself). Meanwhile, for the payroll error, I don’t think we can Venmo it — it needs to be through payroll so that taxes are taken out correctly and so the state has a record of it. Thanks for handling it, I appreciate it.” You might also look up your state’s law on final pay and when it’s due and what the penalties are if it’s late, just so you have that in your pocket if you need it. (Google the name of your state and “final paycheck law” with no quotes.) 5. What state do I file for unemployment in? Federal employee here. I live in State A and work in State B. If/when the axe falls, do I apply for unemployment benefits in State A, State B, or (for whatever reason) Washington, D.C.? You apply for unemployment in the state you worked in. You may also like:I wet my pants at my new jobnew hire keeps kneeling in front of meafter I asked for a raise, my boss told me I buy too much coffee { 319 comments }
weekend open thread – February 1-2, 2025 by Alison Green on February 1, 2025 This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. Here are the rules for the weekend posts. Book recommendation of the week: Case Histories, by Kate Atkinson. After loving Liz Moore’s Long Bright River, I wanted more literary fiction mysteries where the character development gets as much attention as the plot. (Amazon, Bookshop) * I earn a commission if you use those links. You may also like:all of my 2023 and 2024 book recommendationsall of my book recommendations from 2015-2022the cats of AAM { 952 comments }
open thread – January 31, 2025 by Alison Green on January 31, 2025 It’s the Friday open thread! The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on any work-related questions that you want to talk about (that includes school). If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to take your questions to other readers. * If you submitted a question to me recently, please do not repost it here, as it may be in my queue to answer. You may also like:my new coworker is putting fake mistakes in my work so she can tell our boss I'm bad at my jobemployee uses the bathroom stall with the door wide openneed help finding a job? start here { 916 comments }
my new boss coughs all over me, my coworker sucks at managing his team, and more by Alison Green on January 31, 2025 It’s four answers to four questions. Here we go… 1. My new boss coughs all over me I’ve just begun a new position and as a result, have been working closely with my new boss as she trains me. Things are mostly going well — except she is constantly coughing on me! Directly on me! As in, I feel her breath on my bare arm as she coughs into my skin while leaning over me to see my computer screen. When she does bother to cover her mouth, she coughs into her hand … which she then promptly uses to grab my mouse. She also left a used(!) tissue on my desk. I’m coming down with a cold and it’s not hard to put two and two together. She’s an older woman and a senior vice president, I’m a younger and far junior, brand new employee. Do I have any standing to polite ask her to stop doing this? If not, what else can I do other than aggressively sanitize everything after? That’s incredibly rude! In an ideal world you’d be able to simply say, “I don’t want to get sick — would you mind moving away when you need to cough?” And you might indeed be able to say that; it’s a very reasonable request! But if you’re nervous about it, another approach is to make it more about what you’re going to do than what she’s doing: “Let me move away while you input that since you’re coughing.” You can also keep disinfecting wipes nearby and wipe down the mouse after she’s used it — and if she’ll see you do that, you can say, “Since I started doing this, it’s cut down on how often I get anything going around.” There’s also the option of wearing a mask when she’s training you and saying, “I’m close to someone who gets sick easily and since you’ve got a cough, I’m going to be extra careful.” I hope you can use the first option of just directly asking her to stop. But the reality is that people often feel awkward about this kind of thing with a boss, especially when they’re new. So the other options are there if you need them. Related: my disgusting boss touches and chews on everything on my desk 2. Should I tell our boss that my coworker sucks at managing his team? I work in tech, and my team is split by areas of ownership. My manager, Dave, oversees me and three others, and we manage one system. Dave also manages Jeb, who leads five other people responsible for a separate system that works closely with ours. Jeb is my peer but he is a manager, while I am not. Despite this, we’re all part of the same team. I’ve been at the company for seven years, three years longer than Jeb, and had worked with him even before we joined this team. Recently, I’ve heard from Jeb’s direct reports that he’s been difficult to work for. They’ve mentioned personal insults, constant micromanagement, blame shifting, and threats of undocumented performance improvement plans used to intimidate them. This is especially concerning since all of Jeb’s reports are new hires or early in their careers. From what I’ve seen, they are smart, capable, and have the potential to excel if given proper support. Notably, Jeb does not act this way in larger groups or when Dave is present. Jeb and I, however, have a good relationship. While he can be condescending at times, I’ve brushed it off to maintain professionalism. I believe he respects me due to my tenure and values my input when I push back. Really, his behavior doesn’t impact me because I feel secure and confident in my role and position in the company. That said, I find his treatment of his reports unacceptable. His team seems hesitant to escalate their concerns, fearing retaliation. One teammate did raise the issue with a senior leader he felt comfortable with, but it seems nothing has changed in Jeb’s approach. I feel awful for those reporting to him and want to help, but I’m unsure how. Dave is relatively new and likely only knows what Jeb has shared about his team, which may be biased. However, Dave seems people-focused, and I doubt he’d tolerate this behavior if he knew the full extent. I’ve encouraged Jeb’s reports to set up skip-level one-on-ones with Dave to build direct relationships, but I worry that won’t be enough. I’m in a unique position as someone Jeb cannot retaliate against and who has a direct line to leadership. I want to support my teammates without worsening their already challenging dynamic. Should I escalate this to Dave or stay out of it unless asked? What’s the best way to help without causing more harm? Since it sounds like you trust Dave to handle it well, share what you’ve seen with him. You can frame it as, “I want to pass on something I’m hearing to you in confidence, since I’m not positioned to do anything with it myself.” Do it the same way you’d pass along a less charged work-related concern that Dave would want to be aware of — like “I’m hearing rumors Key Vendor A may be shutting down next year” or “Client B mentioned they’d rather we focus on X, not Y, when we present to them.” You have relevant information that you have reason to believe Dave would want to be aware of, so go ahead and share it and then leave it to him to decide where to go (if anywhere) from there. As long as your tone is measured and “here’s a potential work issue” rather than “here’s the hot goss on Jeb, who I take delight in badmouthing,” most decent managers will appreciate a discreet heads-up. 3. How can I tell a friend who’s in a years-long job search that I got a job after a month? I know that nothing is guaranteed, but about a month after starting a job hunt I appear to be very close to securing a job that will meet the needs of me and my family. I’m excited since it will solve a lot of problems for us, and it would make for a very short and successful job hunt. I’m excited, but I’m also wondering how to be kind around a dear friend of mine in the middle of a years-long, painful, difficult job search that has contained many false starts, dead-ends, and disappointments. Do you have any tips for how to be supportive and helpful around celebrating my job hunt ending quickly while also respecting the difficult and frustrating position they’re in? Don’t celebrate it around your friend at all; she doesn’t sound like the right audience for your excitement right now. Let her know about the job change once it’s finalized since it would be weird not to, but keep it pretty matter-of-fact — you’re sharing information, not expecting her to celebrate with you. Alternately, if you’re very close, in some friendships the right move would be to put it all out on the table — “I feel awkward about this and a little guilty since I know how long you’ve been searching, and I don’t want to be celebrating an offer for me when I know you’re having such a frustrating time.” She might reassure you that she’s happy for you and doesn’t want you to hide your excitement for her sake, or she might appreciate you recognizing that. 4. My boss said I couldn’t leave for lunch on a day we had an office party I recently started a new role and, within two weeks, the deputy director of our department decided we would have a small office party for an employee approaching his last day. The party was about an hour with pizza, drinks, and desserts (provided by staff and company funds). I had an understanding with her that I would always be out-of-office for our company-allotted hour lunches to take care of my dogs’ needs. However, on the day of the party, she informed me that employees couldn’t take a lunch on days we had “parties” and therefore I couldn’t go home. I’ve never held an office job prior to this, so is this normal? Granted, it was over lunchtime, with lunch foods, but it was heavily implied it would be rude to not show up and congratulate this employee on their new role. No, it’s not normal — and if you’re non-exempt and in a state that requires employees to be given a lunch break, it’s likely not legal either (although it will depend on the exact wording of your state’s law). It would be different if the party was optional and you could choose to spend your lunch hour there or not, but if you’re being told you must attend the party and you can’t have your lunch break before/after it, a lot of states would prohibit that. You could say this to your boss: “I do need to take my full lunch break to go home every day like we agreed when I was hired — would you rather I do it during the party or after it?” You may also like:I'm my boss's favorite -- and it suckswhen should I tell my friend I applied for a job she wants?I bring my dog to work -- but an anonymous note asked me not to { 226 comments }
should you have a bunch of people send the hiring manager unsolicited letters of praise for you? by Alison Green on January 30, 2025 A reader writes: I just saw the below post on LinkedIn, and I thought I’d send it along and get your thoughts on this strategy. After years of reading your blog, it makes me cringe so much. (Why would you write someone a reference if you weren’t their manager? Why would you pester every person at every interview stage with this letter? What if it’s not helpful information for them? Etc.) But everyone in the comments was praising this, saying how it’s so actionable and helpful and “gold,” which I found perplexing. Curious to hear your take on these kinds of strategies, especially as these sort of “advice posts” become more common. This is the post: Just went through a RIF but weren’t impacted? Are you saying, “let me know what I can do” to the people impacted? Stop. Here’s your play — the Reference in Advance play — or RIA, as the kids call it: 1. Write an email reference template for the person — helps if you were the direct manager or person that hired them — but doesn’t have to be. 2. Tell the person to send you the email addresses of the people of every interview they have. 3. Ask the person when the interview is and when they need it sent. 4. Then copy and paste your letter and send it to those people IN ADVANCE of the interview (makes people stand out immediately, nobody really does this before an interview). 5. You can send it more than once to a specific company as they move through the process by forwarding it to the new people, referencing that you sent it to the previous and wanted to share with them as well. The results can be pretty astounding. And in total, it should take 15 minutes to write the letter and 30 seconds for each send. Put your action where your (maybe empty but maybe you really mean it but don’t know what to do) words are. And we were just saying that there are fewer gimmicks these days! This is indeed a bad idea. First, written references aren’t a thing in most fields (although there are some exceptions, like teaching and some parts of law). When most hiring managers are ready to talk to references, they want to ask about the things that matter most to them, and most will want to talk — so we can hear tone and hesitations and ask follow-up questions. Plus, no one puts critical info in reference letters, so they’re not terribly useful. (I also don’t see anything in this advice about making sure the letters are nuanced or speak to what the job the person is applying for requires, so they really won’t carry any weight.) Second and more importantly, this behavior is way too salesy and annoying. It’s going to look like the candidate is the one organizing it, and it’s going to make them look pushy and out of touch with how hiring works. It will not make them stand out — or at least, it won’t make them stand out in a good way; it is likely to make them stand out in an annoying way. And then sending the letter over and over as the process moves on? It’ll just keep annoying people, and at some point when they realize they’re all getting the same letter, it’s going to feel really spammy. Third, the hiring manager won’t know anything about who these letters are coming from. Are they all your friends? Family members? Is the candidate herself emailing the letters from a bunch of fake email accounts? Someone actually did this to me years ago and it was concerning, not impressive. To be clear, it’s different if the person contacting your interviewer knows them personally. If you hear that I’m interviewing Valentina Warbleworth who used to work for you and you email me to rave about how great she is, that’s something that will carry weight — because I know you, I know your judgment, and it’ll be clear that it was our existing relationship that moved you to do me the favor of giving me intel on a candidate. None of that is in effect with a bunch of unsolicited letters from strangers that will appear to be coordinated by the candidate herself. You may also like:should I point out job applicants' mistakes to them?is it possible to apply for a job too quickly?this is how to write a cover letter that will get you a job { 144 comments }
my office is overrun with corporate buzzwords by Alison Green on January 30, 2025 A reader writes: Recently in my office, corporate buzzwords have picked up like crazy among my colleagues. Sometimes it feels like senior management’s entirely vocabulary is only buzzwords. In a presentation last week, for example, a director said that a “new piece of work is a runway to manifest our brand value proposition.” What does that mean? Now my peers are using the same buzzwords in presentations, and they’re seeping into meetings and conversations. Another example that makes my eye twitch: Suddenly everyone is using the word “solutioning,” as in, “Thanks, Matt, for solutioning our IT request.” You know. Like a detective solutions a murder. I’m all for language evolving, but morale is poor right now and there’s been a lot of water-cooler griping about senior leaders acting inauthentically. I think buzzwords may be contributing to this. When senior leadership’s talking a lot but not saying anything, it doesn’t make anyone feel that what we do has much real-world value. I’m sick to death of conversations that don’t mean anything and waste everyone’s time. Am I overthinking this, or is it something I should address? If so, what’s the best way to do it? I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here. Other questions I’m answering there today include: Should I correct clients who call me “Mrs.”? Can I talk to multiple acquaintances about the same job at my old employer? You may also like:can I get my coworker to stop using awful corporate jargon?is it okay to drink before a presentation?when writing to a hiring manager, should I mention a shared hobby? { 381 comments }
let’s talk about out-of-touch company executives by Alison Green on January 30, 2025 Earlier this month, we heard from someone whose CEO shared photos of his recent family vacation at a town hall after announcing budget cuts, no bonuses, and increased health insurance costs. And we’ve heard about plenty of other out-of-touch executives before — like the company that quizzed employees on the new boss’s horses, family, and vineyard (yes, really), or the manager who wanted everyone to share their best and worst moments of the pandemic, or the CEO who joined a meeting about layoffs remotely from a golf course. Please share your own stories of out-of-touch leadership in the comment section! You may also like:we got quizzed on our new boss's horses, family, and vineyardCEO shared family trip photos after announcing budget cuts, new hire aggressively compliments our work, and moremy boss wants to check in with my doctor, employer wants to hear our worst lockdown moments, and more { 935 comments }
the first person to accept the offer gets hired, reference checker asked how much sick leave an employee used, and more by Alison Green on January 30, 2025 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. Offering a job to multiple people and giving it to the first one who accepts Decades ago, in the early 2000s, my friend was offered an assistant professor position at a university. She was told that the same job was being offered to several other candidates too, and that only the first person to accept the offer would be hired. Presumably as soon as one person accepted, the other offers would be withdrawn. I have never seen this practice anywhere else. This makes me curious: is this legal? (We are in the U.S.) What do you think of employers doing this? What advice would you give someone who gets an offer like this? It’s legal. It’s astonishingly terrible, though! First, it’s a crappy way to treat candidates, who deserve time to think over an offer and make sure it’s the right decision for them and not face pressure to beat everyone else to say yes. Second, good employers want new hires to have had time to mull over the offer so they’re confident in their decision (and thus less likely to cut and run soon after starting). Third, it implies that willingness to jump at the job is more important than who the strongest candidate actually is. Fourth, it’s just weirdly unnecessary. If there’s time pressure for making the hire, you can offer the job to your top candidate and explain the situation; you don’t need to turn it into the Hunger Games. Related: company offered me a job but wants an answer the same day 2. Reference checker asked how much sick leave an employee used What do you do when a reference checker asks you something you don’t believe in providing? I recently received an email regarding a reference for a former direct report. She was an excellent employee, and I was happy to provide it. They provided a list of questions via email and asked me to respond in kind. One of the questions was, “How many sick days leave has she taken during her employment?” I don’t think that’s appropriate information to provide. I have no idea if it’s legal — I’m in the U.S. and the new company is in the UK — but regardless, I don’t believe an employee’s usage of sick leave should impact their reference or their hireability. (And if it does, in workload or reliability, then that’ll show up in the rest of the reference, so it’s still unnecessary.) In this case, I was pressed for time, so I wrote: “An appropriate number, within allowable sick leave. I do not have exact figures.” (Which is true!) I think if it had been a phone reference, I would have been able to push back more clearly, but with an email, I wasn’t sure what else to do. Was that a reasonable response? Is there a better way to communicate “I will not help you fish for ways to not hire people who have human bodies and get sick sometimes”? Yeah, that’s a gross question. As you say, there are far better ways to get at whether someone was a reliable, productive employee — by asking about their actual work, not digging into their sick leave and thus their health. It’s also interesting that they didn’t ask about attendance in general, but about sick leave in particular. Your response was perfect. Also, while I can’t speak to UK law, in the U.S. that’s not a question any reference checkers should be asking, because it’s too likely to elicit information about a disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3. My boss is pretending to answer emails as my coworker who no longer works here One of my coworkers, Jack, recently left the company. Rather than setting up an automatic response to emails that are sent to Jack, his boss has all Jack’s emails automatically forwarded to him. Jack’s boss then responds to the emails as Jack (not just from Jack’s account — he signs off with things like “Thanks! -Jack”). I understand that the email account belongs to the company, not Jack, but am I wrong to think this is strange and might look bad to a client who receives an email from “Jack” only to learn that he’s been gone for months? What! You are not wrong in your take at all. If his boss wasn’t signing off as Jack, I’d give him the benefit of the doubt and figure he just found it easier to answer from Jack’s account (and was maybe a little technologically inept so didn’t realize there are better ways of handling it). But the fact that he’s signing off with Jack’s name is extremely weird and risks blowing up the trust of any client who finds out it wasn’t actually Jack who has been emailing him (at least, assuming this is the sort of work where clients have a relationship with Jack and aren’t just sending one-off questions to be answered by anonymous, interchangeable strangers). Related: my company pretends that former employees still work here 4. My office keeps forgetting my birthday, while they go all-out for others I do outreach in a nonprofit organization, which requires me to travel between three locations in the county. At one location, staff birthdays are loudly recognized with balloons, cards, desserts, the works … except for mine. It has been overlooked for seven years. I talked to the manager of that location last year about it and her reasoning was that since my birthday is right before Christmas, that it’s easy to overlook. So, she put my birthday on the staff calendar. However, as you can probably guess, my birthday was just forgotten again. There are four people at this location and I have worked there longer than all of them except one person. I work at that location two days a week with just as many hours as two of the other staff members there. I am starting to feel really resentful and hurt that I am not as important or appreciated as the other staff, just because my birthday falls before a major holiday. Am I reading too much into this issue and should I just let it go? Do you think it’s worth it to bring it up again to the manager of that location? I think you are probably reading too much into it, but that you don’t need to let it go! I do think it’s probably true that your birthday is getting overlooked because it’s right before Christmas and a lot of people are out then. It’s very unlikely that it’s personal — especially if your coworkers are generally friendly people. You should let it go in the sense of “you shouldn’t keep stewing about it” (to the extent that that’s within your control), but you absolutely can and should point out to your manager that it happened again this year and that it doesn’t feel great, especially when you’d specifically raised it ahead of time. However, since it’s important to you, it also makes sense to change what you do this year! At the start of December, why not approach your manager and say, “Since it’s slipped through the cracks in the past, I was hoping we could plan our normal birthday stuff for my birthday this year. It’s on (date).” 5. I’m contributing a substantial portion of my team’s charitable goal My organization, like many, has an annual appeal for charity where employees can pledge as little as $1 per pay period (or as much as the fairly generous maximum) to charities of their choosing. The website lists thousands of charitable organizations covering almost any issue area that one could imagine. I have been contributing for several years and have increased my contribution each year along with my salary. An off-site administrator manages the campaign and distributes the funds and relays back an aggregate report on how much our organization has contributed. Based on that report, the org has had an overall pledge goal each year that we’ve routinely met. So far, so good. However, over the past few years, the team has been highlighting the progress towards the goal and the final total, and it’s clear that my pledge is a substantial part of each annual total for the entire organization. We are a small-to-medium organization so it’s not surprising that a few people could make a big difference, but my pledge is around 10% of the organization’s pledged total (or more!). I am well aware that many people have good reasons not to contribute to this particular appeal (they have financial constraints on giving, they have charities to which they prefer to give directly, they believe in direct mutual aid or in person-volunteering instead, etc.), and I would never consider it my business to press others to contribute, but it is unnerving to see just how much my single pledge means for the organization meeting this annual challenge. I am not currently planning to leave, but obviously employment across many sectors is in flux and I can’t predict the future. What, if any, responsibility would I have to share with the staffers who manage this campaign for my organization if I did leave? I am wondering if they’d even set a different pledge goal entirely if they knew my single pledge would no longer be included in the total. You have zero responsibility to give the campaign organizers any heads-up when you start thinking about leaving! They can see who contributes what, and they are definitely aware that any of their top givers could leave at any time, or could change their giving patterns. That’s built into the system. They should already be looking at the fact that a single employee is providing 10% of their funds and trying to find ways to balance that out. In any case, if you leave, they will either not meet their goal that year or they will adjust it or they’ll come up with some other plan to meet the goal. It’s not a big deal. (I mean, it might be a big-ish deal to the person charged with organizing the campaign — which ultimately is about PR for your company — but it’s not the sort of big deal where you’d owe anyone any special warning.) You may also like:men are hitting on my scheduling bot because it has a woman's namewhat's up with candidates turning down our job offers after we pay to fly them out?my boss is using my email account to impersonate me { 334 comments }
did I help my mother embezzle money? by Alison Green on January 29, 2025 A reader writes: This is not a current issue, but it’s something that has been eating at me for a long time. I’m trying to figure out if I unwittingly helped someone embezzle money. I believe the statute of limitations has passed for this (potential) crime in the state that it took place in. It has been 15+ years now. My mother has always been a little shady with business her practices. I do not believe she has any qualms about “bending” the law. She is also very charismatic and I suspect would be quite an effective cult leader (i.e., good at talking people into things, frequently nefarious). I’m only mentioning this because it seems like important context to have. She was the CEO and one of the owners of a small business (35-50 employees) that no longer exists. She had two other business partners who helped her start the company. This was a corporation so none of their personal finances should have been directly tied to the company. She put me on the payroll at 13. I helped out at the office probably 3-5 times total between the ages of 13 and 16, so I was not a regular employee. I did things like cleaning and filing. I don’t recall seeing paychecks for anything during that time, though it was quite a long time ago and my memories of this are a little fuzzy. I do remember one incident pretty clearly though. When I was 18, I was given a paycheck and asked to sign it over to her. I had not done any work for this company for quite some time. And I certainly wouldn’t have made the amount the check was written for. I believe it was just under the amount that would have been reported to the government on taxes (I think $10,000 is the threshold). I did see the check and this was definitely a paycheck from the business. She said the money was going to be used for a personal expense. She specifically told me that it was all legal, so I did what she asked. So, is any of this actually legal? Additionally, could she have been doing this while I was underage? Are there any details that would change the legality of the situation? I’m wondering if she found some sort of loophole that may not have been ethical but still legal. Even though I was told it was legal, it felt off to me and I made excuses not to do it again. She was Very Not Happy when I wouldn’t do it again, which adds to my suspicion. The situation is over now, and I am no longer in contact with her. I doubt anything would come back to bite me at this point, but I still wonder if I could have gotten into legal trouble. It almost definitely wasn’t legal. If you own a private business with no fiduciary responsibility to anyone else, you can pay someone for any “job” you want, including one that does no work at all. However, if you’re doing it just so they can sign over their paychecks to you, now you’re committing tax fraud. This can be nuanced and I’m neither lawyer nor tax expert, but in general: Since the income was reported as a payment to you and you weren’t earning enough to pay taxes yourself, that money wasn’t taxed … and even if you were earning enough to need to file a tax return, it’s likely that your mom would have had been in a higher tax bracket than you, since you were a teenager. Either way, that’s tax fraud. Interestingly, there’s a rule that taxes a child’s unearned income at the parent’s tax rate in order to prevent exactly this. But if your mom was classifying it as “earned” when it wasn’t earned through work, we’re back at fraud. I’m also curious whether she paid the business’ portion of the payroll taxes on the wages you received. (If she was paying you as a contractor, not an employee, then this wouldn’t be required. It also isn’t required when paying one’s own children when they’re under 18, but you were 18 for at least part of it.) Additionally, by fraudulently “paying” you, your mom was lowering the business’s taxable income — another problem. It’s possible there were other legal problems too, like if your “cost” was expensed to another entity. And if your mom’s business partners didn’t know what she was doing, she may have been violating laws about her fiduciary duties. If the business were a sole proprietorship, that would change some of this, but it wasn’t. However, your mom was the one committing fraud, not you. It’s extremely unlikely that any of this could ever have come back to bite you — but if your mom had been audited, it definitely could have bitten her. You may also like:I feel horrible about reporting my boss’s tax fraud, limits on employee computer monitoring, and moreI was told I'm socializing too much with another team, two employees arrested for embezzling, and moremy team has been stealing from the company { 139 comments }