don’t make these wrong assumptions about your job interview by Alison Green on March 21, 2016 Job seekers often go into interviews with a set of assumptions in their heads – for example, that the company is a great place to work, that the interviewer is likely to ask particular questions, that the company is most interested in a certain aspect of their experience, and all kinds of other beliefs that may or may not be correct. Some assumptions, though, can be downright dangerous for job seekers to make. Here are five common ones that you should avoid. 1. You’re highly qualified, so surely you’re a top candidate. The employer is probably talking to multiple well-qualified candidates, so it’s dangerous to assume anything about your standing in the candidate pool. Even if you’re in an in-demand field with a shortage of strong candidates, there’s just no way to know who your competition is or what less-obvious traits the hiring manager might be looking for. After all, hiring is about more than basic qualifications; it’s also aboutyour fit with this particular team, this particular manager, and this particular workplace. It’s especially important to keep this in mind if you’re a new applying for a new role at your current company. You might be tempted to figure that you’re a known quantity and therefore have a built-in advantage over any possible candidates from the outside. But while it’s true that many companies give priority to internal candidates, it’s still quite possible to lose the job to someone else. That’s even more likely if you approach the process as if it’s a formality, since that may make you less likely to put in enough time preparing, or you may assume that the interviewer knows your strengths and accomplishments and you don’t need to spell them out. 2. The interviewer knows how to interview effectively. It’s easy to assume that your interviewer is skilled at asking relevant questions and giving you both the opportunity to assess your fit for the position. But in reality, many interviewers are inexperienced, unskilled, or otherwise unprepared to conduct effective interviews. Many interviewers get little to no training in interviewing and are simply thrown in and expected to figure it out as they go. That means that if your interviewer is rambling or not probing into your qualifications, you should be prepared to weave examples of your professional achievements into the conversation, ask questions about the job itself and the challenges the team is facing, and then talk about how you’d approach those challenges. If the interviewer is really off-track, you might even say, “Would it be okay to take a minute and lead you through my professional background? I think it will tie in well with what you were just saying about the position.” 3. The interviewer has carefully reviewed your resume and cover letter and remembers the details. It’s not uncommon for an interviewer to be pulled into the interview at the last minute. Or your interviewer might have read through your materials a week ago or more and not have had a chance to review them again before your interview. Even if she has a copy of your materials in front of you, don’t assume the details are fresh in her mind. 4. The interviewer knows that you want the job. Job candidates tend to assume that of course the interviewer knows they want the job; after all, they applied and showed up to interview. But good hiring managers know that interviews are a two-way street and that strong candidates are using the hiring process to assess the employer just as much as the employer is assessing candidates. If you don’t seem enthusiastic or make a point of explaining your interest in the job, the hiring manager may be left uncertain about whether or not you’re seriously interested. That’s one reason why sending a follow-up note after the interview is important; it allows you to show that you’ve gone home, digested the conversation, and decided that you’re still interested in pursuing the position. (Relatedly, don’t make the mistake of assuming that you know that you want the job until you’ve had a chance to dig into the details of the position and the company during your interview, and to do your own research as well.) 5. You can read the interviewer to figure out what your chances are of getting offered the job. Job candidates often try to read their interviewers’ words and behavior for clues about their chances – speculating, for example, that if the interviewer shows them around the office, it means their chances are strong, or that if the interviewer mentions having other interviews to conduct, it’s an attempt to let them down easily. Trying to read into these actions to figure out your chances of getting a job is understandable, but it’s also fruitless and often misleading. Even if your interviewer says “You’re just what we’re looking for” or “We’re so excited to have found you,” it’s nothing to count on. Things may change — stronger candidates may appear, a budget may get cut, an internal candidate may emerge, a different decision-maker may like someone else better, or all sorts of other things may prevent you from getting an offer. The only reliable sign that you’re going to get a job is when an employer calls you up and says, “We’d like to offer you the job.” I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report. You may also like:my interview was great -- but they hired no one instead of meis it weird to text a job applicant for your first contact with them?how do I get over being rejected for a job I'm perfect for? { 47 comments }
two of my employees had a shouting match about PDA and social media by Alison Green on March 21, 2016 A reader writes: I work in HR for an insurance firm and have been called in to deal with a dispute that erupted on the contact centre center floor between two agents over a social media incident where an agent looked at another person’s screen “without consent.” Both are early 20-somethings a good 15 years younger than my children, so I’m feeling a little out of depth as this is the first time I’ve dealt with anything like this with the social media element. I’ve been briefed on the situation by the team leader of the two agents who pieced together what happened from talking to them, people who saw the incident and what he himself saw. Two agents in a team have been involved in a relationship for a couple of years. We’ll call them Sophie and Matt. From what I have been informed, Sophie and Matt are generally not too gross, but often do things like handholding/kissing each others hands/foreheads when sitting next to each other. This is what they were doing last week when another agent (we’ll call her Charlotte) was sitting next to Matt. Sophie was coming over to his desk constantly throughout the day. While on her work computer, Charlotte went on Facebook and wrote something to the accord of “people who can’t go a couple of hours without being all over their boyfriend are pathetic and gross. I can’t wait for this day to be over so I no longer feel the need to vomit.” She also sent a message through our internal messaging program to two of her good friends (Aaron and Nathan) saying “Sophie and Matt are about two seconds away from banging right here, I’m going to be ill.” About six colleagues liked the status, and Aaron and Nathan replied to the chat with messages agreeing that Sophie and Matt’s PDA is gross. (Sophie/Matt and Charlotte are not friends and don’t have each other added on their accounts.) Sophie saw this on Charlotte’s screen and got furious at Charlotte about it. Based on the way monitors are set up, Sophie would have had to intentionally made a point of looking at Charlotte’s screen to notice it. Charlotte told Sophie that she shouldn’t have been looking at her screen and that if she chooses to invade someone else’s privacy by reading their screen, she can’t complain if she doesn’t like what she sees. Sophie said that in a workplace, that rule “doesn’t exist” and that what Charlotte wrote “wasn’t very nice and she should be ashamed.” Charlotte replied that “*you* should be ashamed….because honestly, what I said is what everyone is thinking” and then they ended up in a shouting match about it. Charlotte apparently was particularly irate with the yelling. I honestly don’t know how to handle this. Charlotte wasn’t doing anything wrong by being on Facebook as the company allows the “reasonable” use of Facebook provided it does not interfere with working duties. Charlotte was not on a call at the time she sent the message/wrote the status. I think regardless of what you think about Facebook use and work, if the company says it is okay, I can’t get mad at Charlotte for being on Facebook. But the rest is where it gets murky. Generally speaking, I do agree with Charlotte in that if you read something that isn’t intended for you or look over someone’s shoulder, you don’t really have the right to be mad if you don’t like what you see, but this was also in a workplace where the computers are generally accepted to be for working use, and I don’t know if that complicates it. Sophie is also saying what Charlotte did is “bullying.” There is nothing in the company policy that really covers an issue like this. Charlotte’s post is a bit of a grey area because it didn’t call out Sophie and Matt by name, but it was clear who she was talking about … but it was also intended for Charlotte’s friends, not Sophie and Matt. If Charlotte wrote the status at 9 p.m. that night, it wouldn’t really be a work issue. Sophie is also upset with Aaron and Nathan for agreeing with Charlotte … but I feel I don’t have much to go in on them for when they just agreed with Charlotte, unless, of course, something should be said about them using the internal chat to talk crap about a colleague. But at the same time, that feels a bit like elementary school and trying to force everyone to be friends. I don’t want to venture into the territory of forcing everyone to be friends and policing conversations and opinions among friendship groups. I also can see where Charlotte is coming from in that I also detest PDA and agree the office is not really the place for it, so I’m worried I’m getting a little biased towards Charlotte’s annoyance at them. So. What is your take on this one? I have no idea how to handle it. Good lord, are you managing teenagers? First of all, you don’t need to sort out all these complicated threads. You can just tell everyone involved that you expect them to act professionally and civilly toward colleagues and that anything else is unacceptable. As part of that, tell Sophie and Matt that they need to stop the PDA — 100% cut it out. This is an office, not a social event, and it’s inappropriate for them to be kissing each other’s forehands or hands at work (eeewww, just writing about that happening in an office is grossing me out). It’s entirely reasonable for you to say to them that they need to stop the physical contact while they’re at work; it’s distracting to and uncomfortable for others and doesn’t belong in an office. The fact that they’re dating doesn’t give them leeway to engage in behavior that wouldn’t be appropriate for anyone else. Surely they can handle not touching while they’re at work, but if they can’t, have them sit separately and tell them to stop visiting with each other during the day. (And seriously, for the comfort of your other employees, you really need have this conversation.) Also, tell Charlotte that if she has an issue with a coworker, you expect her to resolve it by talking to that person directly (or to you if it’s serious enough), not complain behind their backs. And tell her that she has no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding her computer screen at work, particularly when she works in a room full of other people. Tell both Charlotte and Sophie that yelling at coworkers is unacceptable, can’t happen again, and they’re expected to deal with disagreements with colleagues like adults. You’re not going to referee this kind of thing, and you’re not going to get into the details. Their personal feelings toward each other are their business, but when they’re at work, you expect them to behave professionally. Period. That’s it. Don’t get distracted by the fact that some of this involved social media, or who liked whose Facebook status. Spell out your expectations for professional behavior, hold them to it, and don’t get sucked into the adolescent details here. And possibly hire more more mature people? Even if the role tends to attract young candidates, there are plenty of people in that age group who don’t behave this way. You may also like:my volunteer is into BDSM and wants to be a servant at our living history eventsmy company's bad decision got me yelled at online (and socially)my boss excessively Photoshops herself on our company's social media { 461 comments }
my boss told me to stop emailing him, a job interviewer secretly taped me, and more by Alison Green on March 21, 2016 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. My boss told me to stop emailing him My boss has asked me to stop sending emails (even though I have explained I want them as a record) and to talk to him face to face instead. He has pulled me up on it twice and in front of the office accused me of being nervous to talk to him. I regularly speak to him face to face, but when I have important information I am communicating with him, I have always been taught from previous roles to have an email record. His response was that he is getting angry that I send him emails. What would you recommend? I would feel extremely uncomfortable not having email records. There are all sorts of reasons your boss might want you to send him fewer emails, like that he’s trying to manage an overflowing in-box, or that he finds it more efficient to have a conversation where there can be real-time back-and-forth, or that he simply prefers communicating in person. Regardless, he’s your boss and if he’s telling you to do that, you need to do it. He gets to make this call, regardless of what you were taught in previous jobs; this isn’t a situation where there’s only one standard of rightness that’s so important that you must adhere to it even when your boss is telling you otherwise. Do what he’s asking. If there are issues where your boss is misremembering conversations and you want a record for that reason, or where that’s not happening but you want a record anyway, keep your own notes. That doesn’t have to happen via email. 2. A job interviewer taped me without my consent I had a third interview with a company today. While meeting with the hiring manager, I noticed mid-way through the interview that I was being recorded by a webcam. The manager acknowledged that I was being recorded and then asked for my consent. I begrudgingly gave it and we continued. I did not want to say no in fear of losing the job. However, I began questioning my mannerisms and verbiage. I don’t mind being recorded as long as I know about it beforehand. When I left the interview I didn’t think much of it, but now that I have had some time to think, I have a bad taste in my mouth. I live in Florida, and I am pretty sure I cannot be recorded without being asked for consent upfront. Is this allowed? Do I have any legal recourse if not offered the position? I can only assume it was due to something that was recorded, as this was my third interview in one week. I wouldn’t assume that if you don’t get the job it’s because of the recording. People do third interviews all the time without being hired; a third interview isn’t a job offer. That said, an employer who records an interview without bothering to tell you and then asks for your consent only once you notice the camera is a sketchy employer. And yes, in this case they appear to be breaking the law, since Florida requires that all parties being recorded consent to the taping. That wouldn’t give you grounds to sue for not getting the job, but you might have legal recourse in regard to the recording itself (although I’d question whether it’s worth putting time and energy into pursuing). Since it’s easy to feel caught off-guard by employer weirdness during an interview and not know what to say when it happens, here’s some language to use in the future if an interviewer does something that seems shady or inappropriate: “Oh, that’s unusual. Can you tell me more about why you do that / are asking that?” 3. Should I turn down a job out of gratitude to a relative? I’ve been looking to move to a particular city for a few years now. The reason I haven’t moved was because my industry is really small in said city, and I never felt comfortable moving without a new job lined up. The risk would just be too high. In December, I was lucky enough that an extended family member, who knew my struggle to find a job in that city, offered me a position to work with him. I’d be his one and only employee. This job would also not be in my current industry. Thanking my luck that I’d finally be able to at least move with a job, I verbally agreed to the position, but we agreed that I would only start full-time in May (due to benefit and incentive-pay constraints from my current job). Until then, I would work part-time (on top of my current job) so that I could give this job a trial run and see if a) I like working with him and b) I liked the work itself. It was also known that this job would always be a transitional job that would help him reduce his workload and would help me move faster to my desired city. Fast forward to the past two weeks. I randomly got a call from my dream company (in my desired city). They had seen my resume that I had sent over six months ago and wanted me to come in for an interview. I couldn’t pass on this opportunity and decided to give the interview a go. I just received word from my references that they had been called and they were told, by phone, that I’m “being strongly considered for the job.” This is my dream job and I’m super ecstatic that I got to this point. That said, I feel really guilty too. I feel like I’ve already committed to this family member and that I should continue working with him no matter what. He has put in time and money into me and turned down work waiting for me to join him. I know that my dream job is where I should be, but if I do get the offer, should I turn it down since I’ve made him wait so long and technically made him lose money? I should add that, for both jobs, no contracts have been signed. Also, salary and benefits are equivalent for both jobs and are not defining factors. Talk to your relative and explain the situation. I think you’re thinking it’ll cause him more hardship than it actually will. You’re his one and only employee, which says that he was probably happy (or at least reasonably content) functioning on his own and that he offered you the job to help you out more than because of crucial need on his end. Plus, you both agreed it would be transitional, not permanent, and you both agreed you’d be working with him part-time until May to figure out if you liked the situation, which means there was always a possibility that you wouldn’t. I doubt that your relative would want you turning down a “dream job” (problematic as that term can be) out of a sense of obligation. And if he does, then he’s not being fair to you, particularly given all the caveats to your arrangement above. What you do owe him, though, is transparency about what’s going on, a clear expression of appreciation for how he’s helped you, and a sincere inquiry about what the impact of this will be for him so that you can see if there are ways for you to help mitigate that. 4. My boss applied for my job I’m the executive director of a nonprofit. Before I was hired, my boss, the volunteer board chairman, applied for my job and didn’t get it. Now she’s making my life miserable, nitpicking simple decisions and questioning my every move. She was encouraged to apply by the former executive in my position, so she enthusiastically began to imagine herself in this role. However, she is not at all qualified, which was quickly recognized by the search committee. I don’t know anyone who would see this situation as healthy. I’ve been here four months, love my job and am accomplishing a lot, but this stress can’t continue. Any ideas about how to handle this situation? Can you talk to other board members and let them know what’s going on? Ideally in this situation you’d talk to the board chair, but since the chair is the one who’s the problem, it sounds like you’ll need to enlist other board members to intervene. Alternately, you could try addressing it head-on with the chair, but whether or not that’s the right path will depend heavily on her personality and the dynamic between the two of you. 5. How to let a regular sub know she doesn’t need to remind me of who she is I work in an industry where we employ subs to cover shifts when regular employees aren’t available. I’ve been in my position about seven months now, and one of my subs (we’ll call her Tabitha) always begins her phone conversations with me by saying, “This is Tabitha Smith, I’m one of your subs…”. I know who she is! How do I kindly let her know that, without coming off as annoyed? “Tabitha, of course I know who you are!” If a couple of times of that doesn’t solve it, resign yourself to this being how she’s going to start phone conversations. You may also like:my boss told me to meet weekly with my coworker ... but my coworker won't do ithow can I get my boss to talk to me in person instead of over chat?our fundraiser lets us "pie a manager in the face" { 259 comments }
weekend free-for-all – March 19-20, 2016 by Alison Green on March 19, 2016 This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly no work and no school. If you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.) Book recommendation of the week: A Spot of Bother, by Mark Haddon, a dryly hilarious account of a dysfunctional family, related by its stiff-upper-lip patriarch. * I make a commission if you use that Amazon link. You may also like:how to be successful without hurting men's feelingsyes, you are awkward ... and yes, it's okayis there a best time to send rejection letters? { 759 comments }
I badmouthed my employer to classmates, references were contacted before I was even interviewed, and more by Alison Green on March 19, 2016 It’s four answers to four questions. Here we go… 1. I badmouthed my employer to classmates and now feel awful I work at a organization at a university. My feelings about my employer have been mixed – though I like my coworkers, I go from extremes of disliking the job and being critical of the organization’s mission to feeling grateful for the job and accepting. As part of my appointment, I get to take a class at the university. Recently, I shared my negative feelings about the organization I work at with some of my classmates. I was so passionate and fired up that I said some bad things about the organization I work for. I also revealed some information that is not security sensitive, but shouldn’t be shared with outsiders. I told them about a few projects that we’re trying to work on that are not working out, and about how overworked and underpaid everyone is. I was a bit too honest about how I disagree with some of the organization’s activities and approaches. I was generally very undiplomatic and rude. I immediately realized how rude, unprofessional, backhanded, and uncalled for my behavior was, especially given that I don’t have a very close relationship with my classmates. The people at the organization I work at have also been nothing but good to me. I am at times resentful because I am underpaid and overworked, but this is the nature of the position. I am overcome with intense feelings of guilt, anxiety, and regret, and I’m unsure of how to proceed. Should I reach out to my classmates and apologize for my behavior? Should I speak to my coworkers? Well, it wasn’t great, but you probably don’t need to beat yourself up over it this much. I’d go back to the classmates you spoke to and say, “I’ve been feeling mortified about what I said the other day. You caught me on a bad day, and I shouldn’t have said those things. The people I work with have been great to me, and I feel awful about what I said. Please block it from your memory!” Beyond that, just take it as a lesson to watch what you say to people you’re not close with in the future. And I wouldn’t bring this up with your coworkers; you’d almost certainly be creating an issue when otherwise one won’t exist. 2. Can I offer to volunteer if a job offer doesn’t work out? I recently applied for a position that would be a step back/sideways in my career, but which still appeals to me for a variety of reasons. One of those reasons—working part-time—is something that I can only swing financially if my spouse’s employment situation changes. Since you can never know what’s going to happen/how long a hiring process might drag out, I applied anyway and have now been invited for an interview. This is proceeding faster than my spouse’s opportunities, so although I’m going to go ahead and interview, I think it’s likely I will have to turn down the position if it’s offered. If they do indeed offer me the job and I do find that I can’t take it, or if they don’t offer me the job but the interviewer and I had good rapport, is there any graceful/non-weird way to offer my services as a volunteer instead? I happen to have a software certification that I think they will have trouble finding in other candidates, and I wouldn’t mind helping with that aspect in an unpaid volunteer capacity because I’d like to be involved with the organization and I enjoy that kind of work. I would even be interested in training their new employee for free if they can’t find someone else with the technical knowledge they want. It’s a non-profit, so volunteering itself is not a strange thing. However, I don’t want to come across as non-genuine in my initial interest in the job (I would love to take it, I just might not be able to), and I definitely don’t want to make the person they do hire feel weird or threatened. So should I offer to volunteer instead of work for them, or would it just come across as odd? It would be fine to offer that! They may or may not take you up on it, but there’s nothing wrong with offering it. If they do turn you down, it might be because they don’t have the resources or systems in place to manage volunteers well (pretty common — it takes more time and energy than people tend to think it will) or because they’re wary of relying on volunteer help for this particular thing (volunteers are notorious for committing and then not following through, and there are some types of projects where it’s not worth the risk). But it’s still totally reasonable to suggest it, and they might say yes. And it definitely won’t come across as if you weren’t genuine about your original interest in the job; very few, if any, people apply for and then turn down paid jobs as a strategy for sneaking into a volunteer position instead. 3. My references were contacted before I was even interviewed I was offered an in-person interview three weeks from now. I normally notify my references right before interviewing to give them the heads up. However, the day after I agreed to do the in-person interview, one of my references contacted me to tell me she had already been contacted by my potential employer for a reference check. Are there reasons that employers check references before interviews? Is this typical practice? I was under the impression they usually do this after the interview. It’s uncommon but not unheard of. But it’s a really weird and inefficient practice; since most people who get interviewed don’t end up becoming finalists, it wastes a huge amount of time to contact references before even talking with the candidate and establishing some real interest in moving the person forward in the process. The exception to this if if the hiring manager knows your reference personally. In that case, it’s pretty normal to reach out informally before an interview. (In that case, it’s generally a time saver, because getting the opinion of someone whose judgment you know and trust and who you’re especially confident will be candid with you can help you make the right decision about whether or not to interview the candidate in the first place.) 4. I gave notice and my employer told me to leave immediately — do they still need to pay me for the notice period? If I gave two weeks notice and was released on the spot but am not able to start my new job for two weeks, does my former job have to pay me for the two weeks? They do not. Some employers have legitimate or semi-legitimate reasons for wanting people to leave as soon as they give notice, but it’s good form to pay you for those remaining weeks regardless. But good form doesn’t mean legally required, and they can stop your pay on the last day you actually work, even if that day is not the one you chose. In most states, you could probably collect unemployment for those two weeks since you were unemployed during them through no fault of your own. You may also like:interviewer badmouthed me to my references because I didn't want to "harness the power of QAnon"my professor wants us to walk into local businesses and ask if we can do a free project for themshould I offer to work for less so that someone will hire me? { 66 comments }
can you reform a tyrant manager? by Alison Green on March 18, 2016 A reader writes: I’ve seen several posts from you about how to deal with a boss who is a bully or tyrant. My question for you is how can I, as an HR Director, address an issue like this with the supervisor who is being the tyrant? I’ve spoken with the supervisor about the appropriate behavior that we expect and what needs to change, and I honestly think the supervisor wants to do better but can’t see the behavior and the effect it’s having on employees. Are there coaches out their who do this kind of work? It feels like a fundamental change in a person that is beyond being “teachable” at this stage in life. By the way, the person’s manager is wholeheartedly on board and pushing for the change, and we are both communicating that there are severe consequences (including possibly termination of employment). We are just trying to figure out how we can support and train this person who seems not self-aware. You can read my answer to this question — and four others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them). You may also like:my employee is rude to colleagues -- but some of them are rude to her toocan I leave my job after one year if I committed to more?my coworker gives everyone the silent treatment for weeks { 86 comments }
open thread – March 18-19, 2016 by Alison Green on March 18, 2016 It’s the Friday open thread! The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to talk to other readers. * If you submitted a question to me recently, please don’t repost it here, as it may be in the to-be-answered queue :) You may also like:our new phones have fewer speed dial buttons and everyone is freaking outhow do I interrupt my boss in person when I need something?yes, you are awkward ... and yes, it's okay { 1,687 comments }
my boss is livid that I don’t have experience I never claimed to have, employee always barges into my office, and more by Alison Green on March 18, 2016 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. My boss is livid that I don’t have experience I never claimed to have I recently applied for a job that asked for experience in X, Y and Z. I have tons of experience in X and Y, but not much in Z. However, the job sounded interesting and the company would be great to work for, so I applied anyway. My cover letter and resume highlighted my experience and X and Y, and I really didn’t address Z at all. To my surprise and delight, I was brought in for an interview. The interviewer asked a lot about X and Y and nothing about Z. I must have done well in the interview because I was offered the job. Great, right? Well, no. Turns out my new boss is livid I don’t have experience in Z. Livid to the point that I think I’m going to be fired. But, in my opinion it’s still workable: I’ve offered to go training and I’ve suggested adjusting workloads with colleagues so that they could do more of Z and I could do more of X and Y until I get up to speed. I don’t think it’s a deal breaker, but he’s the boss, I guess. He’s pretty upset that I don’t have all the skills he’s looking for – and I get that if he had a vision for how his team would function, then this is not ideal – but he’s even suggesting that I shouldn’t have applied for a role that I wasn’t fully qualified for. Now, I get that if I can’t do the job (even though I think there are ways around it), then he’ll have to fire me. But, did I actually do anything wrong in applying? I didn’t misrepresent myself, and HR never asked about this skill – so what do you think? Should I have passed from the beginning on throwing my hat into the competition? What?! No, absolutely not. Your boss is the one who messed up here, by mismanaging his hiring process. If not having experience in Z was a deal-breaker, then he damn well needed to be sure to probe into Z during the interview process. People apply for jobs all the time without having 100% of the qualifications in the ad. That’s completely and totally normal. You did nothing wrong. I suppose I could argue that it was in your best interest to ask about Z during the interview, to make sure that you felt it was a job you could thrive in … but that pales in comparison to your boss’s responsibility to find out if you had the skills and experience he needed before offering you the job. 2. My coworkers are always trying to feed me and I have an eating disorder I recently started a new position (this is the end of my third week), and am incredibly uncomfortable with the office culture. It is a huge facility with 350 employees and I am the receptionist, so everyone knows me but I don’t know them. I have struggled with an eating disorder my whole life, and am currently in a bad place. My performance is excellent, and I am complimented very often by owners and administration. However, my weight has noticeably plummeted in these three weeks alone (20-25 pounds). Everyone is always reminding me there is lunch (they provide lunch daily), bringing me treats, and then following up on if I enjoyed the food they brought me. I am not comfortable discussing food or eating in front of others. I do not know how to handle this. I do not want to be rude and often lie about eating, but even the act of stating I enjoyed eating something (even if it’s a lie) is very embarrassing and uncomfortable for me. I am getting very anxious daily when this happens. I cannot directly tell these people my situation, because 1. I don’t want to and 2. There are SO MANY of them! How can I even begin to handle this without causing offense OR sharing my personal information? Ugh, I’m sorry you’re dealing with this. First and foremost, I do not have expertise in eating disorders, and I think you really, really need a professional helping here. I’m hoping you have a therapist since the eating disorder is ongoing, and this would be excellent thing to discuss with her, because ultimately we live in a world where people are pushy about food and you’ll want to have strategies for handling that. If you don’t currently have a therapist, please take this as the nudge to get one! That kind of weight loss in three weeks is a big deal. From a workplace relationships angle, you could try shutting some of this down with “Thank you, but I try not to talk about food at work” or “it’s kind of you to check, but I’d rather not talk about food.” Or you could say, “I have a medical condition that impacts what I can eat, so I’d actually be grateful if you didn’t bring me food or check in on my eating — thanks for understanding.” But again, a therapist who specializes in eating disorders is going to be key in getting you through this. Call, call, call today. 3. Employee always barges straight into my office I recently hired a new employee, who is performing well but can be a bit pushy. Every time she has a question for me, she walks at a brisk pace through the hallway, straight into my office and to the corner of my desk (where my screen can clearly be seen), without pausing. I feel like this is a bit of an invasion of my personal space as well as privacy, especially since my desk is situated so the side of it faces the door and someone approaching can quickly see my monitor. Moreover, I tend to get very focused so it is just a bit jarring. Everyone else here is in the habit of pausing each other’s doorway and speaking from there before entering, or knocking on the open door before entering. I am leaving this employer next month, so I know I could just ignore this for a bit and it will go away, but I want to hone my managerial skills as well as coach my direct report properly and not leave a problem for the next person. Is the best thing to do to just politely request that she pause at the door before entering my office due to privacy concerns on my screen, on the spot, next time it happens? Or would it really be better to just forget about it since I’m leaving so soon? Or, am I just being too sensitive? Nope, you’re not being too sensitive at all. It’s a completely reasonable expectation to share with her. (You’re only being too sensitive if you’re frustrated that she’s doing it when you haven’t yet asked her not to.) I’d say this: “Even when I have my door open, would you mind knocking before coming all the way in? I’m sometimes working on sensitive documents or otherwise focusing on something where it would be better not to break my focus at that exact moment. Thank you.” 4. How do I handle being on a city council on my resume? I’m on a small nonpartisan city council and I’m wondering how I should handle it on my resume. It’s a very part-time job. I currently have it listed under a Community Involvement section and I emphasize the position in my cover letter if I feel like it’s relevant to the job I’m applying for. While some managers seem impressed by it, I’m not sure if it might hurt me with other companies. I wouldn’t want to leave it off because a simple Google search would turn it up and I wouldn’t want to get hired at a company where having this position would cause problems. I’d include it, in exactly what you’ve been doing. It’ll be a plus for most employers, but it might present worries about conflict of interests for others. But as you say, if it’s going to cause problems, you want to know that before you’re hired rather than afterwards. Read an update to this letter here. 5. Do I negotiate salary with the hiring manager or HR? I’ve just been offered an permanent position at a company I’ve been doing some contracting work for. I know and have worked with the hiring manager for the permanent position, though she wasn’t my main point of contact as a contractor. The hiring manager told me in person that I would be getting an offer, but didn’t name any details (including salary). HR called to extend the offer officially, and I’m supposed to give them my response (I asked for a day to think everything over). I’d like to negotiate the pay–but should I do that with HR or the hiring manager? It depends on the company. If I were you, I’d call the hiring manager with one or two other questions about the position/offer and then include salary in there at the same time. If you don’t actually have any questions for the hiring manager aside from this, I’d still start with her — she’ll tell you if you need to talk to HR instead. You may also like:I didn't even get interviewed for an internal role I was told I was a strong candidate forwhat to put on a resume when you have zero work experiencethis is why you need a good cover letter { 252 comments }
how can I be more concise at work? by Alison Green on March 17, 2016 A reader writes: I am a contracts manager for a Fortune 500 company; I would liken my position to that of a paralegal. I work for the vice president of sales for my business unit. Because the nature of my job is words, I can be quite “wordy.” However, I try to remember to keep things brief with him because at his level and higher, that’s the way it is. In my 2015 year-end performance review, despite my efforts to the contrary, he dinged me for “not being concise enough” in my communications – written and verbal. He has now asked me to put together a plan for my 2016 performance management to address. He wants to meet with me next week to discuss my plan and I am panic-stricken. Do you have any suggestions for such a plan? Ooooh, I do! I tend to find long-windedness pretty frustrating, so I’m excited for the chance to help someone put together a plan to tackle it. I can’t tell whether your boss has given you feedback on this in the past and is now resorting to a more formal plan because the earlier feedback hasn’t worked, or whether this is the first time you’re hearing about it. Either way, I’d take it seriously, but especially if it’s the former, approach this with the attitude that it’s truly a business necessity to resolve, rather than just a stylistic quirk or preference. Sometimes people who tend toward long-windedness see it as “simply their way” and not a big deal … but it can actually be a serious issue that can make them less efficient and even frustrating to work with, so you want to show that you get that. In any case, I don’t think your plan has to be long (in fact, given the subject matter, it probably shouldn’t be!). If you were my employee, I’d just want to hear the following: 1. In both written and in-person communication, you’ll focus on high-level takeaways, and save background, context, and details for when/if they’re specifically requested. 2. You’ll be vigilant about starting with what the point of the conversation or email is — for example, “this is just FYI,” “I’m seeking your input about question X,” or “I need your approval for action Y.” 3. Whenever possible, you’ll keep your emails to 1-2 paragraphs and use bullet points to make them even more easily digestible. You’ll review emails before sending them with an eye toward where you can trim them down. 4. You’ll be watchful about how long you speak in meetings and other in-person conversations and will strive to give short overviews or summaries rather than complete briefings (unless complete briefings are requested). Where possible, you’ll do some “pre-thinking” before these meetings — meaning that you’ll think through ahead of time what the most important things you need to convey are, so that you can present those from the outset rather than thinking out loud (if the latter has been a problem). And of course, follow the rules above in presenting this plan! It really doesn’t need to be much longer than what I have above, although you might also ask your boss for input about other steps that he thinks will help. You may also like:I babble nervously when giving my staff feedbackdo I care too much about email style?is "have a blessed day" inappropriate at work, promised promotion never happens, and more { 253 comments }
update: my boss’s wife is rude and insulting, and we’re forced to deal with her by Alison Green on March 17, 2016 Remember the letter-writer last fall whose boss’s wife was rude and insulting and kept trying to involve her in their personal finances? Here’s the update. It’s been a very crazy situation, so I’m sorry to have taken so long to send this. I feel like I’ve only just gotten over it properly this last week. Thanks again for your and everyone else’s advice. I showed it to my coworker. We have both since quit and are working at other jobs. YIPPEE! I must say, the “normal” of working with people that are respectful, work hard and aren’t compete weirdos was really startling to both of us at first (in a very good way)! Seriously, I pinch myself each day and feel extremely lucky. So, what happened after I wrote in is we had a meeting: Jane, Boss, Coworker, and I. Coworker and I called the meeting and they reluctantly agreed to have it. We thought the meeting actually went okay at first! (We were wrong.) We came prepared for the meeting – brought in figures, our work hours, Jane’s rude emails printed out, evidence of the increasing workload, and customer comments/feedback and suggested we collaboratively come up with a plan and set of values (for lack of better word) around how we could all work together in 2016, go through everyone’s issues, the money stuff, how we would treat and speak to each other, how we’d all agree to behave, and what we’d commit to do as a company (e.g. answer emails within 48 hours, etc). We printed a calendar of the whole year to plan the goals they wanted to work towards each month. I’m embarrassed to say we both naively thought this could be a positive meeting. Boss was very strange around Jane (his wife). She went through the figures, expressed amazement at how good they looked, apologised for her emails, it was all going okay-ish until Boss cut her off mid-sentence and told her to “okay just be quiet now, you’re babbling, Jane!” I think my jaw actually dropped when Jane retreated into her shell and didn’t say anything. Keep in mind, Boss is usually charming and laissez faire about everything and Jane is usually aggressive and quick to anger. We’ve never seen this side of him. Or her. He turned in a split second. Emotional abuse much? She then very quietly fobbed off the planning and said she wasn’t interested and Boss could go through this on a work day, not today perhaps. Boss said,” Oh, don’t you f**king tell me what to do, Jane!” then said he was going out for lunch because he was bored of the meeting. He left and then Coworker, Jane, and I were still sitting around the table (in shock). Jane apologised again and said she was under major stress because Boss could not handle money well and getting them into a lot of debt. We said it was nothing to do with us and if they couldn’t afford to pay us then they shouldn’t have staff. Jane kept apologising over and over about her emails and said she hadn’t thought before she typed and she was angry at Boss and acknowledged she shouldn’t take it out on us. She then launched into inadequacies of Boss, how lazy he is, how he spends all her money, how he’s irresponsible and selfish… Coworker and I were very wary and just listened and kept moving towards the door. We know better than to get involved in a married couple’s relationship issues. We honestly said nothing, just said some vague hmmmms in response, and got the hell out of there as soon as we could. We left together and were happy Jane had communicated with us and felt we had a bit more understanding of where she was coming from (and that she knew she had behaved unacceptably). The next work day, we came in and started replying to and calling customers. Boss said good morning, was bumbling along, sitting there watching YouTube videos of racing cars as usual for about 20 minutes or so, and suddenly he paused the video, swivelled around in his chair, and the side of him we saw at the meeting was out again. He started shouting and swearing at us saying HOW F**KING DARE WE speak about him to Jane behind his back. HOW DARE WE say X, Y, Z about him (it was actually Jane who said XYZ about him being lazy, not us). HOW DARE WE continue the meeting without him present. Coworker burst into tears and I would have too but I was too shocked! He kept going, really a monster and verbally abusive. We were backed into our work corner too and he was blocking the exit (not stopping us from going or anything, but when someone is shouting like that, it’s quite threatening in atmosphere not to be able to reach an exit). We calmly eventually got out that we didn’t say anything, that Jane said all those things and we just sat and listened, and he started going off again saying he spoke to her and she said we had said all those things about him. I packed up my things, left the office key on the desk, said “excuse me” as I pushed past him, and walked out and so did Coworker, to him yelling at us in the background: WHERE THE F**K DO YOU THINK YOU’RE GOING?! COME BACK HERE RIGHT NOW, HOW DARE YOU LEAVE, YOU DON’T HAVE MY PERMISSION TO LEAVE… etc etc. It was quite scary, to be honest, but in the moment it kind of seemed comical and I felt pity for them. I couldn’t stop worrying about the customers though and what would happen there, but self preservation got me out of there! So all these years, under the casual and relaxed persona of Boss has been a psychopath and behind Jane’s cross-ness/rudeness is an emotionally/verbally abused woman acting out her bottled up anger. And we’re pretty sure she threw us under the bus in her place when they talked after the meeting to save her marriage. Equally scary and sad. So Luxury Teapot Company has sadly now closed. I know some readers suggested Coworker and I buy it (we wish!) but the asking price is around AUD$8 million. Yes, really! They replaced both of us four times since January (so, eight different people) and couldn’t get anyone to stay – while Jane was apparently very nice to them they all complained about Boss being lazy and not managing and the workload being ridiculous – they couldn’t find anyone willing to do the extra hours we had for free. They begged us both to come back but there’s no way in hell. We called Fair Work Australia because surely his behaviour is illegal, but they weren’t particularly helpful and nothing went any further. We’re both just happy to be out of there. So it closed down a few weeks ago because Jane doesn’t have time to answer and service and schedule the customers as she works full-time with a lot of overtime and Boss refuses to answer emails or answer the business phone, so without staff the customers go unanswered and no bookings get made. And no one has a spare $8 million hanging around to buy the business. I feel very sorry for the lovely customers that had booked and now are trying to get their deposits back from Boss and Jane, and I’m still getting calls about it on my personal mobile phone. I do feel a little responsible, but I just couldn’t stay there. Thank you again, Alison, for your and everyone else’s advice. It got both Coworker and I out of the fog and crazyland and things are so, so much better now. Totally and utterly relieved. You may also like:my employees ignore my wifemy boss is rude to waitstaffmost popular posts of 2022 { 154 comments }