15 things you can do in your intranet (preferably Igloo)

And now a break to talk about a sponsor…

I’ve talked here before about Igloo, a much cooler corporate intranet than what you’re used to.

Igloo is incredibly easy to use, and super customizable: You can use it to have a very simple intranet if that’s your thing, or you can use it to create something complex that pulls together team calendars, project information, working documents, wikis, task management, document collaboration, secure file-sharing, and real-time updates from all your teams. And because you don’t need to be especially tech-savvy to configure it, you can even set it up and maintain it on your own, rather than needing to send over change through your overworked I.T. department and having it languish for weeks or months.

And courtesy of them, here are 15 things you can do in your intranet once it’s set up.

15Things_GL-01-01

If you’re looking for a better intranet solution, check out Igloo. It’s surpringly affordable: $12 per user per month, which is about a quarter of what you’d pay for Sharepoint. And it’s free if you have fewer than 10 users.

Disclosure: This post is sponsored by Igloo.

fired employee wants to attend the holiday party, rejected for going to school full-time, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Fired employee wants to attend the company Christmas party

Our office recently let go of an employee for numerous reasons after several warnings, for minor things such as frequent lateness, too many personal calls and emails on company time, general friction with other coworkers, to more serious things such as a very sharp decline in their work quality, cursing at other coworkers, and admitting to getting high at work. Said employee was laid off instead of fired as a sort of favor, and was given the reason as a lack of work for their position.

The problem is, the employee had previously RSVP’ed for the staff Christmas party, which is a fairly formal gathering. They also requested a hotel reservation, which is generously supplied free of charge for those needing one. They have mentioned it to other workers that they will be attending, and they see no problem with it, as they got the party invitation before being let go.

This employee most definitely burned bridges during their final few weeks of work — using four-letter words towards coworkers and calling us a “venomous” office, and did not finish their final tasks without informing anyone, leading to very late nights for the rest of the department to meet a tight deadline. This former employee is now very disliked, and the department mood is now much more relaxed and relieved now that they are gone. As such, most of this department is now refusing to attend the staff party because of the potential for confrontations, especially considering the open bar.

The person in charge of the party is not aware of any of this, and said the company has a policy to let laid off workers attend the Christmas party. However, this is an industry that lays off many workers in the winter and hires them back in the spring, which does not apply to this former employee. My question is should our department head let someone know about the true reason for this firing and have the invitation rescinded?

Yes. If the party organizer doesn’t have this context, they need it. If she just slacked off in her final weeks, that would be one thing, but it’s reasonable that employees shouldn’t be asked to deal with someone who cursed them out and called them “venomous. Your department head should just let the organizer know that the person burned her bridges on the way out of the door and should be removed from the invite list.

Since it sounds like she’d already received an invitation, someone will need to reach out to her and let her know. I’d frame it as “hey, in light of your final weeks with us, it won’t make sense for you to attend the Christmas party.”

I feel like this is going to be a controversial answer, and I do think there’s a counter argument to be made that disinviting someone is really rude and so you should do nothing and just let the chips fall where they may, but this is business function, not a social one, and she basically gave your business the finger. I’m totally okay with saying “hell, no, this is not a person welcome at our employee social events.”

As a side note, it will be extra important that you’re scrupulously fair in all your other dealings with this person though (not fighting her unemployment since you called it a lay-off, not badmouthing her to other staff members, etc.), so that the party thing doesn’t come across as a personal vendetta, just as a matter-of-fact “no, we don’t have people who trash us at our holiday parties, but of course we’ll still meet all of our professional obligations to you” decision.

2. When to bring up foster parenting with contract job that’s likely to turn permanent

I’m in a long-term contract position that has great potential for turning permanent. I’m working my tail off to show my value to the department and my boss, both in getting backlogged work completed and in creating new systems that will make projects move more quickly and transparently. Four months in, I’m building strong trust relationships with my in-company clients, and getting great feedback.

The issue is that my husband and I are expecting a child, but I’m not pregnant. We are in the final stages of being licensed as foster parents, and are planning to adopt from the foster care system. We will likely be getting our license a couple of months after I’m offered a permanent position here at current job, but we will have little to no control over when we have a child placed in our home; we could be waiting for six months or a year to get “the” call, and then may have an hour’s notice or a few weeks’ notice before the child comes to our home.

My husband will qualify for FMLA when our kid arrives and has some flexibility in his schedule, but we will still have to find an appropriate daycare center or local school, and I will need some schedule flexibility to share the childcare load but also for foster-care responsibilities, like court hearings and planning meetings.

In a past letter, you advised a job-seeker to wait to disclose a pregnancy until she received an offer. Would you say the same here, where I’m already a known commodity, won’t be taking maternity leave and don’t know when the blessed event will occur? Or, do I casually mention that I may need time off to deal with a daycare or school change after I’m hired, the same as any parent would if they had something come up?

I’d handle it like you would if you got pregnant a few months after being made permanent: announce it as good news, and explain what you’ll need and your initial thinking for how you’ll be able to make it work. So in this case, I’d probably give your boss a heads-up once you’re licensed or close to when you’re about to be, explain that there’s some unpredictability in when a child will arrive, and that you’re planning to do XYZ to balance work once that happens.

Also, yay to you for being a foster parent!

3. Interviewer rejected me when I said I’m going to school full-time

Recently I was contacted by the CEO of a new start-up for an exciting job opportunity. But when she asked how much longer school would take (a year), she said that she had full-time employment in mind and didn’t think I would be able to dedicate myself to the position. I’m going to school in a subject directly related to the job and have been working a similar job the past two years for another start-up, so I am a very strong candidate. She did say she’d keep in touch, but my boyfriend said that she was probably trying to be amicable.

Should I not mention that I’m going to school full-time if I get a similar offer? I could go to school part-time instead, though I’d rather not. Should I have said that? I admit, I kind of shut down the last few minutes of the interview and didn’t try to make a case for myself. I just thanked her for her time. I’m wondering if I should contact the CEO and ask to be reconsidered, but I’m not sure if that’s something that’s done.

Yeah, a lot of employers are nervous about people going to school full-time while they’re also working full-time, because they’re concerned that you won’t won’t be able to balance both, and that work will suffer. That’s especially true with high-stress or high-workload jobs, and start-ups tend to be both. When an employer tells you that you can’t do both, you should believe them — it often means that they’ll need you to work long or unpredictable hours, and that they’re not going to be willing to accommodate class or studying schedules.

4. Can I get rehired at the company that put me on a PIP?

I received a performance improvement plan (PIP) while working at my previous position this summer. I was at the company for 5-1/2 years. I made efforts toward having the PIP removed for two months, but ultimately resigned and started a new position. After doing contract work for a period of time, I tried to return to my company. When I called, Human Resources informed me that the PIP was preventing me from being rehired. Is this permanent? I’d like to call my manager and ask her about it but I don’t want to embarrass myself or waste her time.

Yeah, it’s probably permanent. Being on a PIP means that your company had major concerns about your performance, and is often the last step before someone is fired. Employers generally don’t want to open the door to that happening again.

5. What should a transition plan include?

I’m expecting a job offer to come through (yay!) and as soon as the paperwork is signed will give my resignation notice. I’m trying to think of what all I need to do before leaving. They don’t typically handle these sorts of things well here, and my current supervisor is new in her role, so I don’t think there is a good plan in place for handling departures. Admittedly I’m a bit overwhelmed so I’m afraid of forgetting something important, and wondered if you had list of things to do before leaving a job or what should be included in a transition plan?

Yes! Meet with your manager to talk about the status of key projects, offer to train anyone who needs to be trained on key tasks, and leave behind notes on stuff that your replacement will need to tackle soon after starting, contact info for key people (vendors, clients, helpful resources), and any helpful advice you have on anything from a performance issues you’re working on with an employee to what printer gives the fastest turnaround time.

But also, keep in mind that you won’t be able to transfer absolutely everything from your brain to the new person, and that’s okay. (And in fact, if you try, no one will retain it all anyway.) Hit the highlights, and things should be fine.

a coworker at my new job is pressuring me to start before I’m ready to

A reader writes:

I recently accepted an offer for a position at a very small company. Most of the group has worked together for decades and they are extremely tight-knit. There have been three attempts to hire someone for my position, and no one made it to the one-year mark. But these red flags were counterbalanced by the fact that they have a brand new boss who wants to make changes, and he and I hit it off immediately.

I came down with a serious illness a few days after accepting the job. It’s nothing fatal, but I may end up having a lengthy recovery period. There’s no way I will be able to start when they need me to, and my capacity to work might be limited for weeks.

I have been in contact with my boss and the person I’m replacing. I offered to withdraw my acceptance so they could hire someone who could start sooner (and work at full steam from the get-go). They both assured me that they prefer to wait for me to recover rather than hire one of the other candidates.

This morning, one of the other employees sent me an out-of-the-blue email. She told me that she had been diagnosed with the same illness before and didn’t need very long to recover. She also stated I’d get better more quickly if I did a little work. This prospective coworker is the person I would be working with the most closely. I don’t blame her for being annoyed and frustrated, but I feel the tone of her email was passive-aggressive and accusatory.

Maybe it’s my fever and lack of sleep talking, but at this point I’m inclined to rescind my acceptance of the position. I’ve gotten off to a bad start, and the emailing coworker has gotten off on the wrong foot with me. In such a small company, interactions really matter. I’d rather bow out now rather than be the fourth person in this position to leave or be let go. What are your thoughts?

I wouldn’t rescind your acceptance because of this one (admittedly completely weird and inappropriate) email from a coworker.

Honestly, the bigger red flag I see here is that the three people in the position before you didn’t last a year. If you’ve thoroughly explored the reasons for that, and you have good reason to be convinced that it’s going to be different under the new boss, then this might be a perfectly fine job to take. But if you haven’t thoroughly explored that, and you’re having second thoughts now, I’d listen to those instincts.

But assuming that you’re confident on that front, let’s talk about this email from the coworker. I think it raises two questions: how to handle the immediate situation of the email itself, and whether it says something broader about what working there is going to be like.

As for how to handle the email itself, I’d reply to it and say, “Thanks for your concern, Jane. I’m glad your recovery went well. Fergus and I have agreed that in this situation, it makes sense to wait for me to recover before I start. I’m looking forward to joining all of you once that happens.” And cc your new boss — you want him aware that Jane is sending ridiculous, inappropriate emails to a new hire.

Now, does this email from Jane say something about what you can expect once you start working there? I don’t know … but I suspect you’ve been exposed to enough data during this whole process to have something of an idea, so go back through what you know about this office and the people who work there. Was Jane part of the reason previous people didn’t last? Did you get other indications of weird boundaries in this office? What have you seen about how personal interactions work there? What’s the culture generally? Have you seen real indicators from the new boss that his words will have teeth to them, or might he just talk a good game?

I don’t know the answers to any of these questions, but those are the things I’d be looking at as you try to figure out if this is a situation you want to take on or not.

And if your gut is telling you no (once your fever subsides, that is), even if you can’t back it up with data, it’s reasonable to listen to it, especially if it has a generally good track record.

is a bad employee better than no employee at all?

A reader writes:

I work in an office where you’d have to set your desk on fire to get terminated. We have an employees who dinks around all day, dodging responsibilities and refusing to improve. Meanwhile, the rest of us run around like chickens trying to serve the clients.

My boss admits that this person is a subpar worker. But he refuses to consider firing this person; he insists that if we do so, our corporate headquarters will never replace the position. (They think we’re overstaffed, and maybe this situation bears that out.) Then instead of getting subpar, reluctant work, we’ll get none at all.

I admit that’s a possibility, but the whole thing seems silly to me. Yeah, maybe we’ll lose the position, but is letting these person fester in that spot forever, making everyone crabby, really better? Let’s take a chance! And I say this as someone who would probably have to help take up the slack if this person goes.

Do you think my boss is being prudent, given that corporate headquarters is very reluctant to fill empty positions (we had to wait months for a terribly crucial position to be filled after someone quit), or he is being cowardly?

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them).

my employee has a crush on me, and it’s making me uncomfortable managing him

A reader writes:

I am a female manager at a small, mostly male company, and directly manage several people (all male). One of the six has worked for me for multiple years. Since he began his employment, I always felt he had a “crush” on me and kept my distance (as much as feasible being his direct manager).

His “crush” has gotten increasingly more obsessive over the past year (constantly staring at me, using absurd reasons to contact me through email/messenger/texts, whether at work or evening/weekends, and getting extremely emotional/upset if I do not frequently talk with him or provide feedback for his every task). He never says anything inappropriate or makes any advances but is making me increasingly more uncomfortable.

My tendency to avoid the employee combined with my obvious annoyance with his increasingly absurd reasons to interact with me is reflecting poorly on my management skills — to the extent that my manager is questioning my abilities to manage.

I think your move here is to address the problematic behaviors, while leaving the presumed cause of the behaviors (the crush) out of it. In fact, it doesn’t really matter if there’s a crush in play or not, because what he’s doing is really inappropriate regardless of what’s motivating it.

It also might be easier for you to tackle this stuff if you remove “crush” from your thinking and instead just see “weird, unprofessional, and annoying performance issues that I need to address like any other.”

More specifically, that would mean the following:

* Address the staring. When you see him staring, meet his eyes and say, “Is there something you needed?” Do this every time you see it. Chances are good that it’s going to jog him into realizing that he’s staring, and he’ll stop. But if that doesn’t happen, then you can address the pattern: “Hey, I keep noticing you looking at me. What’s up?” Followed by, if necessary, “Could you cut that out? It’s unnerving to me. Thank you.”

* Address the constant emailing/texting. “I’m finding that I’m getting so many emails and texts from you that it’s interfering with my ability to focus on other projects. Can you please save up anything that’s not time-sensitive for our weekly check-in (or for one long email a week, or whatever makes sense in your context)?” Then, if it continues: “As I mentioned previously, I need you to save this sort of thing up for our weekly check-in, but it’s still happening. What’s going on?”

* Address the emotional reaction if you don’t talk with him “enough”: “I’m not going to be able to provide you with feedback on every small task, although I’m glad to debrief some key projects during our weekly meeting. Why don’t you propose one or two each week that you’d like to debrief and we can do that then? Beyond that, though, I need the person in your role to work pretty independently, without daily interaction with me. Is that something you can do?”

And again, the key here is to see all of this the same way you’d see any other performance issue. “Motivated by a crush” doesn’t move him to a special category where he’s not manageable or where it’s okay for you to avoid him.

Take on the specific behaviors, forget the crush, and see what happens.

interviewer stole my ideas, holiday bonus angst, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. The company I interviewed with stole my ideas

What do you think of a company that interviews you, asks you to list specific ways to improve things, but doesn’t hire you — yet implements your suggestions anyway?

I interviewed with a publication several months ago and suggested posting its covers on Instagram. Now they’re doing it. Also, they’re posting tweets in the publication, something else I suggested. I suppose it’s possible that they came up with this on their own. But do companies pick interviewees’ brains for ideas, even when they don’t hire them? Seems pretty crappy if they do.

Most companies don’t. Some companies do. More often than not, it’s unintentional — a candidate says “it would be great to do X,” and the employer thinks, “Hmmm, it would be great to do X.” At that point, it’s a tough situation — because they can’t hire the wrong candidate just because the person suggested something they ended up wanting to do (and you could make great suggestions and still not be the best candidate, for multiple reasons). Also, often the idea is the least of the work, and the real work is in figuring out a strategy and plan and implementing it.

That said, if the idea is a particularly complicated one and the candidate contributed a lot of time and brain power walking the employer through it, they should really pay that person a consulting fee, to avoid bad feelings if nothing else. But suggesting posting publication covers to Instagram is the kind of thing that was going to occur to them at some point anyway … so with that one I think you’ve got to just write it off as not really stolen or something you took a loss on.

2. How to tell an employee not to expose her midriff

How do I talk to an employee who is wearing shirts that are not long enough to cover her midriff? I do not want the conversation to be about her weight (as she is overweight) and clothes not fitting properly but just about general office attire (even though we are business casual) and that your stomach should never be showing under any circumstances.

This one should actually be pretty straightforward: No employee regardless of body type should be wearing shirts that expose their stomach, so you can simply explain that. For example: “Jane, please make sure that your midriff isn’t exposed while you’re in the office. Our dress code requires that midriffs be covered. Thank you!”

3. People keep thinking my last name is my first name

I work in a job where I am responsible for building 1:1 relationships with my company’s field representatives and supporting the work they do for high net worth clients.

I have a last name that sounds like a first name. Let’s say, for example, my name is Kaye (first name) Miranda (last name). It never fails, people in the field erroneously call me Miranda as my first name, although it’s my last name. The curse of two first names. I get it.

Any suggestions on the best way to redirect? I’m not in the military and I’m sure that it’s unintentional when it happens. I’m looking for a suggestion that won’t make people feel bad for calling me the wrong first name, but will nip it in the bud, too.

Just correct people cheerfully, matter-of-factly, and quickly. Cheerfully because you don’t want to be surly about (even if it gets old), matter-of-factly because it’ll make it less awkward, and quickly because it gets more awkward if you let it go on for a while before correcting it.

Just a quick, “Oh, it’s actually Kaye! Miranda’s my last name. So let me show you the document you were asking about…”

4. Part-time former employee asked about a holiday bonus

One of my full-time employees quit last March and went to work for one of my competitors. However, she made arrangements to continue working for me on an on-call, as-needed basis. It is not ideal for me, but it has worked okay (not great, but okay) so far. Recently, she wrote to me asking if she would be receiving a bonus this holiday season. I was rather shocked and thought it was just plain rude. In the past, I have not always been able to do bonuses, but have done them if I could.

For this particular employee, she quit. Granted, she made arrangements to continue working for me, thereby negating the need for me to hire someone else full-time and instead paying only when I need her specific skills. But it is also a way for her to put extra money in her pocket, which I am sure was her main reason, as opposed to loyalty to me and my company. What is the etiquette regarding bonuses for on-call folks?

It’s very, very normal to only do bonuses for full-time staff, and you can simply explain to her that that’s your practice.

For what it’s worth, it sounds like you’re taking this pretty personally, and I’d try not to. She may be naive or inexperienced with how this normally works, or she may figure she has nothing to lose by asking. I doubt she means it as an F-you, and you shouldn’t take it that way.

(All that said, bonuses are fundamentally retention strategies. If you’re strongly motivated to retain her, there’s no reason you can’t consider one.)

5. Should we cross-train so we can take time off without interruption?

I work full-time as an administrator for an accounting firm. One of my coworkers and I each took over for people who retired after being here for many years.

It has become increasingly apparent to me that the administrators before us had gone above and beyond their job duties and somewhat “spoiled” the partners in the office we work in, even as far as being called back from holiday to take care of tasks the partners considered emergencies, but which could have been handled with a little forethought.

The problem is that there is nobody to cover our positions when we are gone. Would it be in our interest to teach each other the basics of our jobs so we can be free to have a vacation without an “emergency,” or would it be best to bring this up to our supervisor and see what happens? Is cross-training on the sly a good idea?

If you have the time to cross-train and your managers don’t object for some reason, then yes, definitely, it’s a great idea. But I don’t see any reason to do it on the down-low; presumably it’s going to come out eventually, and it’s even in your best interest to make it known that you’re able to cover for each other.

are mandatory happy hours just part of working in an office?

A reader writes:

I’m still pretty young (25) and, personally, don’t enjoy really corporate/professional office settings and the formalities that come with them. My career has thankfully taken me to a firm that seems to be a happy medium: still corporate and professional, but with young company culture, business casual dress for my team, and a good deal of autonomy/low amounts of micromanaging. My entire team is in their 20s and my boss is only 30, so we’re all pretty close and relate to one another on some level, even if we have different interests. It’s a great job, one I’m good at and pays well, so I try not to complain.

However, I’m a bit of an “old soul” for my age and I really, truly do not enjoy drinking for several reasons–simple ones like not enjoying the way alcohol makes me feel, and more complex ones like coming from a family with alcoholism. I also have depression and some social anxiety, so all these things combined make happy hours a type of anxiety-ridden nightmare for me. I literally dread them every waking minute, from the moment they’re planned until I can finally go home. My coworkers, on the other hand, love them and drink like fish.

In an effort to keep the team tight-knit, my boss takes us out for team happy hours a couple times per year, where she usually buys us at least one round of drinks. It’s a nice gesture and I appreciate it, but I dread these happy hours like the plague, and it’s not as simple as saying “I don’t drink” and getting water instead. I just simply do not want to be there, and it feels like I’m supposed to be.

These happy hours have never been labeled “mandatory” but are always organized to take place on days when everyone is free, and on the days I have opted out–either from just not wanting to go or being sick or what have you–I’ve gotten the distinct feeling that it’s looked down upon and my boss resents it. I’m also always the first to leave, which makes me anxious about looking bad, but my boss/coworkers tend to sit at these bars for hours (usually until 10 p.m. when we get out at 5), drinking, barely eating (or only eating heavy, fried bar food), etc. These are also always on weeknights rather than a Friday night, which is a problem for me because I have a routine outside of work that’s important for my mental health. I exercise, I cook healthy food, I go to therapy, I spend time with friends and family, and I try to get to sleep at a decent enough time to get up and work out in the mornings. I don’t enjoy these outings at all and am often counting down the hours until I can go home, but usually the first person to leave is met with an “awwww, what? Why!?” which feels like unfair pressure.

I guess my long-winded question is, is this just a part of working in an office? Should I suck it up and deal with these happy hours, or should I have a talk with my boss about how drinking is a negative factor in my life and I prefer not to be around it as much as possible? As much as I’m more than happy to work with my colleagues collaboratively between 9-5, I feel like not wanting to go to these happy hours will still make me look like I’m unappreciative/not a team player.

I think there are two separate issues here: anxiety over this kind of work/social event in general, and the added anxiety of them being consistently in bars.

Let’s tackle the happy hour/bars/alcohol part first. No, this doesn’t have to be just part of working in an office. It’s true that it’s part of working in some offices, but in cases where it’s truly expected and optional-but-not-really (where you’re pressured to go and it’s frowned on to skip it or duck out early), there’s usually some kind of unhealthy dynamic going on around drinking and/or a youth culture thing that tends to be pretty unwelcoming to older employees or people with families or other outside-of-work commitments. When everyone’s in their 20s, it can be easy to think that isn’t a big deal, but it basically ensures that the team doesn’t grow much, because it self-selects for people who inherently have less experience (and usually, but not always, less professional maturity/professional wisdom).

But as for team bonding stuff more generally: Yeah, that’s pretty often part of working in an office. When it’s done well, it’s low-key and doesn’t violate people’s privacy or dignity (nothing like horrifying team-building events here), is held during work hours or is truly optional, and happens fairly occasional rather than constantly. A happy hour a few times a year falls squarely on the “reasonable” side of the line for me … but your boss should absolutely be open to hearing “hey, bars make me uncomfortable” and using other locations instead.

So. If the bars are a big part of the issue for you here (as opposed to just not wanting to go, regardless of the location),  I think you should tell your boss that. If that’s the case, I’d say something like this when the next happy hour comes up: “I realize I should have said this earlier, but for a bunch of reasons, including family history, I’m not comfortable in bars or being around people who are drinking. So I’m going to sit this one out — but I do appreciate the value of being able to bond as a team, and I wonder if we could try some other ways of doing it that aren’t just happy hours? I’d be glad to help plan a lunch or something like that, if you’re open to that.”

You can skip the mention of family history if you’d rather (although I think it can help to include something like that, which doesn’t give too much away but provides some vague context). You could also, in theory, skip offering to plan something else — but often when you’re objecting to something like this, it’s helpful to propose an alternative. And in this case, it makes it harder for her to see you as the team grinch.

Proposing your own alternative also allows you to propose something that’s during work hours, so that you don’t get stuck fending off another after-work event.

However, if the issue is less the drinking and the bars and more about general social anxiety, then yeah, I think you’re best off going, having a soda, and leaving early and just tolerating the ribbing you get for ducking out. You could also try saying something like, “It’s tough for me to do things that go past 7 p.m.; I have a bunch of post-work commitments that I can’t get out of.” And frankly, if you really wanted to, you could use that an excuse not to attend at all — but as long as it’s just a couple of times a year and not more frequently, I think your best bet is to just look at it as an annoying but rare work obligation.

how Zappos’ manager-free model is working out, is working from home contagious, and more

Over at Intuit QuickBase’s Fast Track blog today, I take a look at several interesting work-related stories in the news right now: how Zappos’ manager-free model is working out, whether working from home is contagious, and more.

You can read it here.

my boss’s wife is rude and insulting, and we’re forced to deal with her

A reader writes:

I work for a small business with a home office on contract. There is no HR department or anything like that, it’s just the owner, me, and another worker. The owner’s wife (who has a full-time job so we never see her) manages the finances; I’ll call her Jane.

My colleague and I keep receiving emails from Jane with no greeting/salutation and an overly aggressive tone, and every time we send our invoices to get paid for the previous period’s work, they’re met with sarcastic comments and payment is consistently late.

Most of her emails contain general complaints and stress about money. To be clear, we have zero access to the accounts and we haven’t spent any money, but we will bring up items that have run low, are requested by customers, or need to be replenished to our boss. Boss spends money without discussing it with her. We think perhaps she is taking this out on us. We keep replying to emails saying “please discuss with Boss directly,” but they keep on coming.

For example, after I sent my September invoice to her (and cc’d Boss) as usual for the previous month’s work and said, “Hi Jane, please find attached invoice xyz for September. Kind regards, me.” (The invoice details each day I worked and what was done, rate and taxes, etc.) She wrote back: “What is this for exactly???” I wrote back (as always, cc’ing my boss): “It’s for my work during September. Any issues or concerns, please contact me, happy to clarify.” Her response: “We DO NOT have money growing on trees here. Explain to me why I should shell out money?”

After some back and forth of polite explaining that we have a contract and it is services in exchange for money, Boss asked her to pay it ASAP, and she then wrote back to me: “We have a LOT of bills. Just yesterday you asked me to pay for ink for the printer which I can’t do because my son is going to soccer camp and I have expenses happening there. And now you send me this and <colleague’s name> also sent me a bill. We are going overseas in December but thanks to you it looks like we’ll have to cancel because we can’t afford it. You are increasing our spendage, we want to be decreasing it.”

To clarify, I am working once a week for agreed upon hours and I work through lunch and work late without payment because we are so understaffed. I am only billing for my time; any business purchases go through them.

Then, after I sent October’s invoice a month later, she said: “I’m not sure if you’re a slow learner, but I’ve told you already we don’t need increased monthly bills and we are looking to reduce not increase costs.”

Another example from last week: “Call and tell them I WILL NOT be paying the $1400 bill from Boss’s phone. Apparently he went over plan limit. Well I won’t pay it.”

I showed Boss, and he apologized for her rudeness and asked me to call telephone company and get back to Jane. My email: “Hi Jane and Boss, I’ve followed up your invoice with as requested. Attached is a list of all the calls and data used that explains the charges. They suggested you might want to look at moving up to a larger data plan. I asked on your behalf, but they won’t waive your bill unfortunately because there hasn’t been any error on their part, the data did go well over the limit of your current plan and they did send automatic SMS notifications to let you know. They’ve also warned that as the bill payment is so late, if the invoice isn’t paid in the next seven days that they’ll switch off the service to the phone.”

The phone got cancelled and she wrote to me and colleague: “Useless. Both of you.”

What’s your advice on how to communicate that we really don’t want to be involved in their personal finance discussions and that her emails upset us to the point of interrupting our flow of work, we both leave the office feeling super down in the dumps, and it’s slowly chipping away at our motivation to be there?

Obviously, something needs to be done because this is festering for us both. Is it best to bring it up with our boss? He is likely to brush it off and tell us to ignore her. Both of them? We love working there, love our customers, and are working hard for them and both put in unpaid overtime most weeks because we care about the work we do.

Boss claims wife Jane is just moody. We both need the jobs and money (both single parents and flexible job options in Australia are not easy to come by) but it seems in any other normal company, you could take these emails to HR. What do you do when there’s no HR department and you’re not an employee?

First, just to make sure this is clear, your boss’s wife’s behavior is totally ridiculous and unacceptable. I think you know that, but sometimes when you work around loons, they start changing your norms and your sense of what’s okay. So for the record: This is serious loon territory. (I especially love her utter shock and confusion when you dare to ask to be paid for your work.)

Anyway, I think you’ve got to decide how much you’re willing to push back on this. In a reasonably healthy workplace, it would be completely appropriate and absolutely not at all unreasonable to say to your boss, “Hey, I am not okay with Jane talking to me this way. She’s being rude and insulting, involving me in your personal finances, and making it hard for me to do my job. Can you please ensure that she stops?”

Now, obviously, you’re not working in a healthy workplace, but that fact alone doesn’t mean that your boss wouldn’t be responsive to this kind of statement. There’s a decent chance, in fact, that right now he’s just taking the path of least resistance — and since you and your coworker so far have let Jane get away with her behavior, it’s easier for him to just allow it — but that if you said “no more” and meant it, he’d find it easier to tell her to chill out than to lose both of you or to have to deal with two really unhappy employees.

Or perhaps not. This is his wife, and it’s possible he’ll coddle her at all costs … but if he has any sense, he’ll realize that this will be an issue with the employees after you too, and that eventually he’ll need to address it.

Anyway, there’s no way to really predict with certainty, but unless you think he’ll fire you for setting boundaries, I’d speak up. It’s possible he could fire you, but it’s pretty unlikely. The more likely bad outcome is that it just doesn’t doesn’t resolve the situation.

And if you do end up there — with her behavior continuing after you’ve said “this isn’t okay and it needs to stop” — then at that point you’ll need to decide if you’re willing to put up with Jane’s behavior as a condition of the job. If that happens, then a a minimum I’d say that you should look elsewhere and see what your options might be; you shouldn’t assume that you’re stuck until you’ve actually tried to leave.

And this is indeed worth leaving over, if your boss refuses to deal with it. You’re being routinely insulted and forced to deal with an angry, hostile loon.

Read an update to this letter here.

my manager offered to take a pay cut, rescinding a recommendation, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My manager offered to take a pay cut so the rest of us can earn more

I work for a small nonprofit. It is common in our industry for there to be a big pay difference between the local manager and the rest of the staff. It is what it is, but at the same time, boards constantly bemoan how difficult it is to recruit and retain skilled staff.

At a recent general voter meeting, my manager said that she would be willing to take a pay cut to give some of those funds to other staff salaries. She did not give details as to how this would be done; it was sort of an invitation to the board to act upon. Everyone present was surprised by this statement. No action was taken in the meeting. I was touched by my manager’s willingness to sacrifice, and I also thought it was a positive, if not necessary, direction for pay equality to go in if we want to attract and keep quality staff.

I am in the minority of staff opinions on this. My coworkers who I’ve spoken with have all said they would not allow our manager to take a pay cut. I have mixed feelings: I’d really love a raise, and while I don’t believe the manager is grossly overpaid, I’m perfectly happy to let her “take one for the team.” We have an upcoming staff meeting where an agenda item is “staff salaries,” and I think I will struggle with the conversation that takes place.

Am I being selfish in my willingness to stand by while my manager sacrifices? Should I try to speak up in favor of her doing this, or just keep quiet and let the chips fall where they may?

I think that if your manager is willing to do this, it’s not really your place to try to talk her out of it. She’s a professional adult, and she can figure out for herself if it’s something she feels good about doing and if the change would be sustainable for her in the long-run. It’s possible that she’s looking at salaries across the organization and seeing an opportunity to make pay fairer.

That said, her willingness aside, taking her up on it wouldn’t necessarily be a smart move for the organization. If she’s being paid a fair market rate right now and she gives some of that up, what’s going to happen when she leaves the organization at some point? Are they going to have to lower the salaries that her pay cut previously let them raise? Or just have to struggle to attract good candidates for her role with the lower salary? And would this move create a situation where she’s earning less than her peers, who all happen to be a different sex or race,  which could cause a separate set of issues? All of that is reason for whoever will make the final call on this to tread really carefully.

2. Can I rescind my job recommendation of an ex?

I recommended an ex-lover/friend for a position at my company. I was mostly prompted by a generous $5,000 bonus, and I really wanted him to move to my city.

This guy never treated me well, but I of course was blinded by love. I’ve since separated myself from him and now I’m regretting the recommendation. I do think he is qualified for the job, but I don’t want him being there to affect me at work. We are a relatively small company of about 250 people all in one huge room, and I’d probably see him in passing every day. My team does interact with the team he would be working on from time to time. I really like my job and I don’t intended to leave my current position anytime soon.

Now I realize that my recommendation was a mistake, and I asked he not take the position before he interviewed. He is very poor and has had a difficult time finding a job after graduating in May. When I spoke with him about it, he said that if it’s the only job he gets, he has to take it.

Is it possible for me to rescind my recommendation or explain the situation to the hiring manager? Will it make me look bad? I really like my job and I don’t want to it to be ruined for me. (In addition to my personal reasons, he informed me that he cheated during the given coding test. For one of the answers, he told me he googled the question and copied and pasted the answer. This would be what I tell my boss when I rescind my recommendation.)

Ooooh. It depends on how big of a deal him googling that answer was. On some tests, doing that would be fine; being able to quickly locate the right information would be just as good as already knowing it. If this really was cheating, though, then yeah, you could let your manager know, and say that you don’t feel comfortable recommending him as a result. But it’s kind of tough to “rescind” a recommendation beyond that; the assumption is that you thought it through when you gave the initial recommendation, and you’d really need additional information that’s come to light since then.

It’s also kind of crappy, I think, to do to a friend who’s already invested time in a hiring process. I think at this point I’d just let it play out, unless the cheating really was cheating, given the context.

3. Should I tell an employee the reason I’m firing him?

I manage employees who start with a three-month probationary period. I have a current probationary employee who has not taken direction well, has acted defensively and challenged basic instructions about how to do his job, has literally rolled his eyes when provided with feedback on how to do certain tasks, and ironically who has also sought me out for instructions in situations where the course of action for him to take should have been immediately obvious.

I intend to hire a replacement and terminate this employee near the end of his probationary period. I would like to give him feedback on the reason for letting him go, for a variety of reasons. From an ethical and professional standpoint, the feedback would be to his benefit, regardless of whether he realizes or appreciates that. And since he’ll inevitable ask why he is being terminated, if I do not disclose this, I feel he will be more resentful and frustrated and will make uncharitable assumptions as to my reasoning.

My boss, however, does not believe I should disclose any reasoning to the employee, since probationary employees can be let go for any reason, and my boss feels that my rationale for terminating him is inherently subjective and will inevitably lead to an argument. I do not intend to partake in an argument and believe I should simply outline my rationale and refuse to engage the employee in any debate if he pushes back. How do you think this should be handled?

You should absolutely tell him. It’s cruel to let someone go and refuse to tell him why, it sounds terrible to other employees who hear about it, and it’s exactly the sort of thing that creates bad will — much more so than if you’re straightforward with him about the reasons.

Not only that, but if you haven’t given him feedback on the issues you’re seeing, ideally you’d do that now so that he’s not blindsided when you do let him go. (I can totally get deciding that you’re not going to change your mind — I would too, if someone had an attitude like what you’ve described — but firings generally go more smoothly when they’re not the first time the employee is even hearing that there are problems.)

And last, you also don’t need to wait until the end of his probationary period. If you’ve already made up your mind, it’s kinder to him and more efficient for you to cut the cord now. It doesn’t make sense for either of you to keep investing in training him when the end is a foregone conclusion.

But even if you ignore me on that, yes, tell him why when you let him go.

4. Recruiter called earlier than scheduled and I didn’t pick up

I had a phone interview scheduled for 11:30 a.m., but the recruiter called at 11 a.m. I was on the phone with a student loan company when she called, but the loan company wouldn’t let me go, even after I told them that I had a very important phone call on the other line. They kept talking and the recruiter hung up on the other line. I immediately emailed the recruiter, apologizing for the inconvenience I caused, and asked if I could reschedule the interview. My question is, have I failed the phone interview before it even started?

Well, first, you didn’t cause any inconvenience. The recruiter called you half an hour early and you were busy with something else. You’re not required to remain free for the whole day just because an employer might call later or earlier than scheduled. So please don’t apologize to them for that, or see it as something you did wrong

It’s possible that they’re not going to reschedule with you, because that’s how some inconsiderate recruiters operate. (And in this case, I’m worried that the wording of your email made them think it was a mistake on your end, when in fact it wasn’t.) But all you can really do is see if they reach back out.

As an aside, no one can force you to stay on the phone. When you told the loan company that you needed to hang up and they refused to allow it, you could have said, “I’ll need to call you back, goodbye,” and hung up. Again, you’re not at fault for not doing this — but I also don’t want you thinking that people can trap you on calls that you don’t want to be on.

5. I lied on a job application and my offer was pulled

I’ve been working at a job for about three months now. Between having a new baby and the hours, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s not for me. I applied for a new job, and I got an interview. But since at the time I applied, I had only been at my new job for a short time and I didn’t want to have a gap in employment or come across as job jumping, for my current job I listed my last job prior to here, which I had been at for over two years.

When the HR person did a background check, they saw I had left in July, which at time of interview was about two months before. Now they have basically taken away the potential job offer. I know it probably wasn’t the best option, but is there any way I could still get the job or is it a lost cause and I should just move on and deal with the current bad job until I find something else?

It’s very unlikely that there’s any way to salvage it. You lied about your employment and said you were still working at a job you’d left a couple of months before. That’s going to be a pretty big red flag about integrity; employers generally don’t want to hire someone who lies about that sort of thing, because they assume that you’re not trustworthy and will lie about other things too. I’d write this off, and take it as a useful lesson for future applications.