employer told me that it’s not professional for entry-level candidates to negotiate salary

A reader writes:

I recently got offered an entry-level job at a nonprofit in a field semi-new to me after moving to a new city. When applying for the job, they asked me to include my salary requirements with my résumé and cover letter, and I gave a minimum number (I know, I know now that that hard figures should be avoided). After knowing more about the job from the interview and doing some more research about comparable salaries in my area, I realized that this minimum was lower than what is normal for my area.

Once I was offered the position, I replied by counter-offering a little higher, about $3,000 more – still on the low side for this field of work, but one I’m comfortable with given my relative lack of experience. In response, the CEO told me, “just to give me some advice” because I’m young and newer to the workforce, that it’s not professional to counter-offer. He told me I was “moving the goal posts” on him. He also told me that if I had wanted to change my desired salary, I should have told him before he offered me the job. However, I would never, ever think to do this for fear of torpedoing any chance of getting the job by doing so – I’m entry-level in a competitive job market, and I would think that this would scare off potential employers.

The CEO said he wouldn’t hold it against me and that he would get back to me on whether my new number would work, but the exchange left a bad taste in my mouth. The notion of counter-offering being inappropriate flies in the face of all advice I’ve received, my personal experience, and most job advice articles I’ve read. When I told family and friends about the exchange, they were flabbergasted.

Was it rude of me to counter-offer in this situation? Was I wrong to not inform him of a higher desired salary before the job offer? Would doing so seriously risk my chances at a job?

He said he “wouldn’t hold it against you” that you attempted to negotiate? How kind of him.

But I wonder if what he was really saying wasn’t that it’s unprofessional to negotiate (because, wow, no, it’s not), but rather that it’s unprofessional to first state you’re seeking one salary and then ask for a higher one when it’s offer time.

It’s true that that’s not great to do. It’s true that that can even be “moving the goal posts,” as he said. But it’s also true that you generally learn a lot more about a job during the interview process, and you can learn things that change your assessment of what a fair salary would be.

When that happens, it’s good practice to explain that it happened. You don’t want to just ask for more money without acknowledging that it’s a different number than you gave earlier. You want to say something like, “After talking with you and learning more about the responsibilities of the job, I think a salary in the range of $X would be fair.”

And frankly, you probably did mess up by not doing that research about salaries in your geographic area until later on in the process. You’re expected to have done that by the time you’re naming a figure … otherwise that first figure you named doesn’t have much meaning, and they’re not asking you for an arbitrary number. They’re asking you for a number you’d really accept.

So there were some aspects to this that you didn’t navigate perfectly.

But as for his claim that it’s unprofessional to negotiate simply because you’re less experienced, he’s wrong.

It’s true that when you’re entry-level, you generally don’t have a ton of room to negotiate. Most entry-level candidates (although not all) haven’t yet developed the reputation and track record that would give them standing to do serious negotiating. But that doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t negotiate at all, and it definitely doesn’t mean that it’s unprofessional to negotiate.

What’s unprofessional is telling a candidate that it’s unprofessional to negotiate, or frankly, giving any unsolicited career advice at that stage. If he felt he had important information for you, he could wait until after you were hired and share his advice with you then. Right now, though, you’re two business people considering doing business together; you don’t need his advice on being professional, and you definitely don’t need it from someone who’s getting it wrong.

employee wants halal lunch options, answering “would you rather…” interview questions, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Employee wants halal lunch options

I work as part of a small HR team in a medium-sized start-up company — around 50 employees. We offer employees a range of free stuff, including lunch. The way lunch works is that a small amount is deducted from the salary and we provide lunch. This is cheaper than bringing in your own lunch. The options are vegan, vegetarian, gluten-free – but not halal. Currently 100% of our employees participate.

We have employees of various backgrounds. One of them is Jane. Jane’s department has flexible working hours, so she can also practice her religion – going to pray during work hours and coming back to work afterwards. She recently wrote to me about a problem: The place we order our lunch from does not offer a halal option. She is not happy about the vegetarian option, since she is not a vegetarian.

What should we do? On the one hand, we have invested a lot of time and energy in finding a healthy and tasty lunch option, and people are very satisfied with it. I could suggest her to talk with finance and take her off the office lunch list, and she could bring her own lunch. This would however make her stand out of the crowd and not be inclusive. On the other hand, I also want to be part of a company that welcome diversity and where there is space for everyone. But is it too much to make a special agreements for one employee? Do you have a good suggestion of what course of action to take?

You should try to find halal options.

If you really want your workplace to be diverse, that means that you shouldn’t run a workplace-wide program that excludes some people because of their religious practices, especially when there’s a pretty straightforward fix.

Making special arrangements for one employee isn’t inherently a bad thing. You’d presumably make special arrangements for someone in a wheelchair, or with a life-threatening allergy, or a Jewish employee who needed to leave before sundown on Fridays, and so forth. It’s not about “is it really worth doing for just one person?”; it’s about “we recognize that we have a bunch of different people here, we value that, and we want to show them they’re welcome and make it easy and appealing for them to stay.”

There may be limits to that, of course, depending on how people’s needs intersect with your business needs. But offering halal food is pretty straightforward and doesn’t seem like it should be running up against any kind of reasonableness limit.

2. How to answer a “would you rather…” interview question

How would you have answered this interview question I was asked: “Would you rather be the #1 performer in your office but got along with none of your coworkers, or be the #15 performer in your office and get along with everyone?”

I’d answer: “If either of those was the case, I’d consider it a problem that I’d want to figure out how to fix. I don’t think you can sustain top performance without strong relationships, and even if you can, it’s going to be hugely disruptive to an office. And while I realize not everyone can be #1, I do hold myself to a high bar and would take 15th place as a sign that I needed to figure out what I could be doing better.”

A good interviewer will accept that and be happy with it. Bad interviewers may try to insist you make a choice. There’s little that can be done about them, but I suppose that if pressed, you could say that you’d take option #2 with the caveat that you’d be working hard to raise your performance, because that one has room to let you improve, while the damaged relationships in #1 may not be surmountable.

3. I can’t get an answer from my company about what my role is

Working at a company for five years, I moved up the ranks quite quickly through hard work and dedication. I love my job and I got promoted to supervisor because of that. After that promotion and the success of the company, new responsibilities started to become my own, especially supporting how the department was managed.

My manager went on a leave, initially for a couple of months, and I was asked if I would take the wheel during his absence. I took the challenge as I was already doing most of the job already. What started as a couple of months ended up extending to a year and a half, and I’ve started to ask what my role is.

Several promotions have been announced, I’ve engaged upper management on my situation and I always get a similar reply to “we’ll discuss this next week at the latest,” but next week comes and… silence. I’ve gone on holiday, come back, it’s been two months, and nothing changed (except the workload!).

I’ve been working hard and my dedication is intact, but I am an ambitious person. I even mentioned that if they want to hire a manager, I’d be okay with that, but again, I need to know what my role is. I was hinted by a “the bigger question is do you want that role” (to which I already said yes, if you think I’m the guy you want), but that the role was being defined, as it will be a new role. Again it’s been two months. I find it an awful lot of time to define a role and present a proposal.

I don’t want to give them an ultimatum, but I’m getting tired of chasing the company to either give me the position or let me know I’m not getting it. How can this be done in the most “politically correct” way?

You may not be able to. They know that you want an answer, and for some reason they’re choosing not to give you one right now. All you can do is to respond to what you do know, which is that they’ve left you hanging for months and ignored your multiple direct requests to figure this out.

You could try saying something like, “I’ve been very patient while this was worked out, but the timelines we’ve discussed have come and gone. I need to be able to make good decisions for myself, so can you give me a realistic sense of when you’re likely to have a more definite answer for me, or whether that’s unlikely to happen any time soon?” Any sensible manager will hear that the subtext there is “or I’m going to start thinking about other options.”

But if you want to move up, you may need to look outside your company to do that.

4. I sent out the wrong version of my resume

I’ve recently decided that the job I’ve been working for the past three years is not part of the career path I want to take, and have been accordingly applying to positions in a tangentially related field that I believe better suits my skills and work style. Over the past couple of weeks I have applied to a number of good prospects, and I was feeling quite good about my chances.

Until last night.

I was going back over my applications and realized I had somehow sent an outdated version of my resume with all of my applications. The work history, etc. is all correct, but the objective states that I want to be working in an entirely different career!

Is there anything I can do to salvage my relationship with these potential employers? Should I send an updated version of my resume? And if so, should I acknowledge my mistake in my cover letter, or just let it lie? Or do I need to just move on and take better care in the future?

Ooooh, that sucks. You have nothing to lose by sending a corrected version of your resume with a short note explaining you already applied but sent an outdated version of your resume … but yeah, this isn’t great. Mainly I’d focus on making sure it’s correct going forward.

5. Can my company dock my vacation days if I answered emails while I was away?

I took a 10-day vacation but still answered work emails during this time (there were only three days I did not log on). I heard in Texas, my company cannot dock my vacation days because I was working. Is this correct?

No. If you were taking those days unpaid, they’d have to pay you for the time you worked … but assuming that this was paid vacation, no law requires them to count those as work days rather than vacation days. (Otherwise, everyone would just check email while they vacationed and never have to use any vacation days.)

update: my older coworker won’t stop mothering me

Remember the letter-writer whose older coworker wouldn’t stop mothering her and even contacted her actual mother to check up on her? Here’s the update.

Thanks for the wonderful comments, everyone; getting so much support definitely made me feel more confident dealing with this issue. It hasn’t been too long, but I do have some updates!

My mother did talk to me instead of messaging Sue back when Sue contacted her to say I “was rude.” I asked her not to respond and helped her block Sue on Facebook (my mother is not great with technology, which was a good thing in this instance since I did the blocking and know it got done!). I am still Facebook friends with Sue, but I did some research and found I can technically be “friends” but still block her – so all Sue sees is my “public profile,” which is basically nothing.

Sue approached me shortly after this to ask about the “changes to my Facebook” – I told her I changed my privacy settings and was happy to know it worked, thanks for telling me! She hasn’t brought it up since. I don’t know if she has tried messaging my mother, but she hasn’t said anything to me about not being able to.

We had a few conversations where she asked about my restroom habits and I told her “that is a very strange thing to ask a colleague.” Both times she told me she was just worried about my health and I responded “well, I’ve got it under control. I will let you know if I want your help though.”

Basically, I made it uncomfortable for her a few times and she kind of awkwardly trailed off and then stopped asking me. At this point, she has basically stopped talking to me completely (as I said, our work doesn’t overlap, so that’s fine).

I’ve been worried about retaliation – her complaining to our manager who has been her good friend since high school – but I think I’m safe now because of another change!

This week, we had two college interns start! It’s the first time the company has ever had interns and she IMMEDIATELY flocked over to mother them. So far, they seem okay with it (and if they aren’t, they’ll be leaving in May anyways) – AND she has been very distracted from her “concerns” about me. I think this was even better than getting her a puppy to parent (which some people suggested)!

 

8 signs that you’re a problem employee

Being successful at work is about more than the skills you bring to the job – it’s also about your relationships with your colleagues, and especially about how your boss perceives you. You can have incredible skills in your field, but if no one wants to work with you, it’s going to make your professional life harder and harder over time.

Here are eight signs that you might be perceived as a problem employee who’s tough to work with – and that you could be putting your professional reputation and future options at risk.

1. You see management as your adversary. If you think that peers who get along with their managers are suck-ups, and you see employee/manager relations as an “us vs. them” situation, chances are strong that your attitude is coming through to your manager and marking you as adversarial. And no one wants to spend their days working with adversaries – let alone paying them.

2. You say “It’s not my job” at least once a month. There are times when it’s appropriate to say that you aren’t the right person to do something, such as when you’re swamped with work that your manager agrees is higher-priority. But if you find yourself refusing tasks on a regular basis, you’re probably painting yourself as difficult. Job descriptions aren’t comprehensive, and most people end up doing work that doesn’t fall perfectly within their job description.

3. You take your manager’s requests as “suggestions.” Sometimes a manager’s input really isa suggestion that you’re free to take or leave – but more often, managers tend to expect you to do what they’ve asked. If you habitually ignore requests or input that you disagree with, over time your manager will figure out that she needs to scrutinize your work to make sure that you’re not rejecting aspects of assignments you don’t like. You will probably not find that close scrutiny pleasant.

4. You have trouble finding a former manager willing to give you a reference. If former managers don’t get back to you when you contact them about a reference and they don’t return reference-checkers’ phone calls, there’s probably a reason. Most managers feel incredibly awkward about turning down a request to be a reference, so if you’re seeing a pattern of it happening, it’s a sign that you need to rethink what’s going on in those relationships.

5. You always ask for forgiveness rather than permission. It’s true that as you advance in your career, you’re expected to exercise independent judgment and make your own decisions in many areas, but if something is a major decision with high or public stakes, most managers want to be in the loop. If you regularly make calls that you know your manager might not approve and just hope you can beg forgiveness afterwards, you’re likely to seem like an increasingly high-risk bet for your employer.

6. You look for reasons things can’t be done rather than looking for ways to do them. If your favorite refrain is “that will never work,” you might be having a supremely frustrating effect on your team. People sometimes think they’re serving a valuable role by playing devil’s advocate, but constant naysaying takes the wind of new ideas and initiatives and squelches people’s enthusiasm.

7. You’re stuck in a negativity loop. Occasional frustrations at work are normal. But if you feel negative about your job and your company every day, it probably shows – and maybe more importantly, it’s probably affecting both your work and your quality of life. When that’s the case, your best bet is to figure out whether there’s a way to be reasonably happy at work or whether you’d be better off moving on. If you don’t make that decision for yourself, it may eventually be made for you.

8. You’ve disliked every boss you’ve ever had. If you’ve never been satisfied with a manager you’ve worked with, you’re the common denominator there and it’s likely to reflect something that’s going on with you. It might be an inability to be satisfied, unrealistic expectations about work, a problem with authority, an anger problem, difficulty getting along with others, or something else entirely – but it’s worth taking a look at it and seeing if you can spot what’s going on.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

should employees have to train their new manager?

A reader writes:

What is your opinion about direct reports training a new manager? I’ve experienced this twice now, where I have taken on a management job where my direct reports (usually less than a year in their own position) were appointed to train me. My preference is for a more seasoned person or my boss to do so and that was my expectation. I’m also concerned about my staff thinking that this is an odd situation or even getting demoralized because of it. I do feel quite competent that I can understand the new role quickly, but I feel like I’m not getting the right training and might not be giving the right impression to my direct reports.

I’ve been thinking of speaking to my boss about my concerns, and also I think getting training from various old time personnel who don’t report to me would help tremendously in my training. When I first experienced this, I wasn’t a complete career changer, but this time around I was hired more for my managerial skills rather than my product knowledge. I’m not completely without that knowledge, but it’s different when it’s not something you have worked with directly. What do you think?

It’s very, very normal for a manager coming in as a new hire to be trained in some parts of her job by people who report to her.

They’re presumably not training you on the parts of your job that only you as the manager can do — like assessing performance, giving feedback, and so forth. They’re training you on the things that they’re familiar with.

For example, if you were hired to manage a communications department, I’d expect that your staff would train you on how to use the department’s media database, common processes used by your team that you might need to use too, how to use the weird phone system, and so forth. I wouldn’t expect them to train you in how to set media strategy or how to assess their performance, or how to advocate for them up the chain of command; that stuff is really your purview. But other things, like the ones I’ve named here? If they know how to do something, they’re the logical ones to show you.

It sounds like you’re worried that a manager should start out knowing everything, or at least that it shouldn’t be so obvious to employee that she didn’t. But that’s not how it works. You weren’t hired because of your knowledge of how to do lower-level work; you were hired because of higher-level expertise. Meanwhile, though, you still need to know how an unfamiliar database works or how your team normally handles situations A, B, and C, and it’s reasonable to have your new team show you those things.

You don’t establish your value by coming in already knowing what your team knows; you establish it through effectively leading and managing that team, and that can be a quite different skill.

Sometimes the flip side of this comes up, where employees resent that they have to train a new manager, figuring out that if she was really worthy of her job, she wouldn’t need the training. That’s wrong-headed too, for exactly the same reason: The manager is bringing a different, more senior kind of expertise that has nothing to do with whether or not she comes in already knowing process details about how a particular department works.

That said, you shouldn’t assume that your employees will know exactly what would be most helpful for you to know, and if you feel like you’re not getting the right training, that’s a situation that you should be proactive about managing. I’d figure out why you’re feeling that way, and where you feel the gaps are — and then figure out who can best fill them in for you (which could include asking your team members and/or your boss who they’d recommend that you talk to about X).

my employer wants me to apologize for job-searching, how far back should your resume go, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Do I owe my employer an apology for interviewing elsewhere?

I was laid off a couple of months ago and took another job to help pay the bills. I have had my eyes open for another position, and went to interviews. I work at night, and recently a card with a time, date, and a request for references fell out of my pocket while I was working, and it was very obvious that I was going to be interviewing.

Somehow that card made its way to the general manager’s desk. My direct boss took a photo of it, sent it to me, and told me that the GM is practically blowing a head gasket over it. I told my direct boss that I had no idea it was there, but that I had simply been looking for a part-time position. His response was “Well, you should apologize to her better.”

I am having a very hard time with this, because this place I applied to offered me a position (it’s not on paper yet), and I really want to take it. I was going to work with my current position to be either part-time or on-call, but now I’m not sure I want to do this.

I don’t know if I’m supposed to apologize for something being on her desk, or for looking for jobs. Do I really owe my GM an apology?

In general, you don’t owe an employer an apology for talking with other employers or seriously considering moving on.

That said, it’s not outrageous that your GM might be upset that you just started at this job and are already talking with other employers; it’s pretty frustrating as an employer to invest time in training someone and then have them leave within a few months (or even ask to go part-time, if the position is intended to be full-time). In that situation, it’s usually good to acknowledge that inconvenience.

But demanding an apology is pretty ridiculous and meaningless (in any situation, including this one). And the fact that someone photographed that info card is weird.

As for what to do now, it would be nice if you were able to honestly say, “I was looking for work that wouldn’t interfere with this job, and I’m taken aback by this reaction” … but it seems like that’s not really true, so in this case I think I’d just wait for your written offer from the new place and then decide if you still want to offer to continue any sort of work for the old place. (Be prepared, though, for the possibility that may not want to, because they could very reasonably feel burned by you moving on soon after they hired you — although that depends in part on the nature of the job.)

2. An interview at “5ish”

What do you think about a general manager who schedules an interview “on the ish”? I have an confirmed interview next Wednesday with the GM, HR, and operations manager at “5ish.” Is this a red flag? Should I run? Bring a book? Does it mean he’s always late, or if I get there 4:50, am I late? I don’t understand a loose time to start a scheduled interview. It seems unprofessional and informal.

It’s weird, and I’d assume it means he might be late, but you should be there at 5. I don’t think it’s something to run away over, but I’d pay attention to what other signs you get about their culture.

3. How far back should your resume go?

How far back should my experience on my resume go?

Currently, I have my work history staring from 2006. I could go further back, but I purposely started there because my most recent job prior to that was only for three months as a receptionist. The company (in investment banking) was sold shortly after I started and due to a non-compete agreement, I was not allowed to move into another position in the private banking part of the company that remained. Also, my job before the receptionist position was only for 8 months because it was a seriously tedious entry-level admin job. Both jobs would of course add another year of experience, but were relatively entry-level. Earlier positions were your average “I’m fresh out of high school” retail jobs that I don’t think employers would really care about.

Am I doing more harm than good by leaving off this early career history? Would it help show that I’m a mid-level career candidate vs. an entry level employee if I share my full work history, or will it just cause more questions and make me look flaky for such short stints early in my career?

Nope, keep it the way you have it. In general, resumes are usually strongest if they go back 10-15 years. It’s rare that anything from before that will strengthen your credentials at this point, particularly versus more recent experience — and that sounds like it’s indeed the case with the pre-2006 jobs you describe.

And you don’t need to worry about appearing like an entry-level candidate if you start it at 2006; that’s 10 years of work experience!

4. My sister has a horrible desk

My sister is an intern in an HR department. One day, she sent me a picture of her desk, complaining that she has no place to put her wallet, phone, or pocketbook. Well, the desk had no drawers. I asked her if there was a closet or filing cabinet nearby, and she said no. Upon further investigation of the picture, I noticed that her desk is facing a white wall. I said, “Why are you facing a wall?” She said, “I have no idea.” So I asked if there was anyone else facing the wall and she said no. I decided not to make a big deal about it.

Now, two weeks later, her boss told her she is going to go with the rest of the HR office employees to another HR location upstate. When the meeting and tour was over, she and all the other visiting HR employees were told they could pick any office to sit and do their work. My sister chose an office, and as soon as she sat down she was told to leave the office because they were going to have a meeting. She was directed to a conference room with a desk facing a white wall, away from all the other employees and closed off. I thing there is something wrong with this whole situation. Do you?

No. It’s pretty normal for interns to get the worst desks/office areas, because they’re short-term employees and the lowest on the food chain. And there’s nothing particularly outrageous about sitting at a desk that faces a white wall; plenty of employees at levels well above her do that.

5. I keep getting final interviews but no offers

I’m an avid reader of your blog and make sure to follow all the protocols for applying to jobs. I’ve been job searching for over a year and have been on over 20 interviews. Many times I’ve made it to the final round of interviews where they’ve even told me it was between me and one or two other people. But I never get the job. I follow up for feedback and it’s always positive. One of them even forwarded my resume to another manager for a new position. I made it to the final round in that one too only to be told that they decided to “go in another direction.” I came to find out later that they hired someone who already worked there. This has happened several times as well where the company just decided to hire internally, but insisted that I was a great candidate. How can I even compete? With so much positive feedback and final round interviews I don’t know what else to do. I’m just getting exhausted, losing valuable time, and getting depressed. What do I do now? How can I stand out?

If you’re routinely getting to the rounds of interviews, you’re probably doing everything right. There’s not really anything you can to avoid being beaten out by internal candidates, and clearly your cover letter, resume, and interviewing skills are good if you’re making it as far in the process as you are. Assuming that you’re confident that your references are enthusiastically recommending you (and that’s something to check if you haven’t already), I think this is really just a waiting game — eventually you’re going to be the finalist who gets the offer.

weekend free-for-all – November 7-8, 2015

Olive and Eve in basketThis comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly no work and no school. If you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Book Recommendation of the Week:  Hyperbole and a Half: Unfortunate Situations, Flawed Coping Mechanisms, Mayhem, and Other Things That Happened, by Allie Brosh. If you don’t already know Allie’s awesome blog, you should. The book is filled with more of the same — brilliant narratives about her childhood, her depression, her dogs, and more, all illustrated with the funniest drawings you’ve ever seen.

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

my manager is hassling me about charitable donations, being late to an interview, and more

It’s four answers to four questions. Here we go…

1. My boss knows what I contribute to United Way and is pushing me to give more

I was just recently hired on at a company. I knew going in they were big on working with United Way and there was a mandatory 24 hours of volunteering per year. I am all for giving back and make my fair share of donations throughout the year. What I was not informed about was the expectation that I contribute through my paycheck to United Way. However, knowing the culture of the company, I did authorize a small amount of my paycheck to go to the charity.

Here’s the problem. My manager pulled me aside and said he “strongly urged” me to reconsider adjusting my contribution to a higher amount by about $25/month. I know that seems minimal, but I have a family and several expenses. They hired me on at the same rate I was making before, so this would be a loss of income. They don’t know what my financial situation is.

The bigger deal is: how does he know what I contributed? Isn’t that supposed to be confidential? I’m contributing what I feel is fair and can afford. The impression he gave (and from some research this evening), I get the distinct impression this could adversely affect my career here. If I would have known of this unspoken requirement, I would’ve pushed harder for a higher salary to accommodate this. Am I wrong in thinking that sharing employee contributions is wrong and unethical? Who really has a letter legal right to that info? I get that they may need a total dollar amount for tax purposes but by employee doesn’t seem right.

It’s actually not unusual for your manager to know how much you contributed to a company-side charity drive like this. I share your discomfort with it, but some companies that work with United Way have really high pressure tactics to push donations, and this is one way it sometimes plays out. It’s messed up.

I’d just say this: “More isn’t in my budget.” If you get resistance, call it out directly: “It’s not something I budgeted for, or something that I’m able to do. Is this going to be a problem?”

2. Should LinkedIn profiles be first person or third person?

Should LinkedIn profiles be written in the first or third person? Mine is in the third person and someone commented on how that’s “unusual.” Is it a bad thing?

It’s super common to see them both ways so I wouldn’t worry too much about it, but I do think first person sounds more natural and conversation, which is what you want. After all, it’s not a third-person blurb about you on a book cover or something like that; everyone knows that you wrote it yourself.

3. Writing a thank-you note for an interview I was late to

I just completed an interview that went very well EXCEPT for my one stupid mistake. I arrived late at the interview by 5-10 minutes late. I stuffed my cell phone in my tiny purse to avoid distractions and relied on my watch. When I got to the subway station, I then noticed that my watch’s batteries were dying and it was 30 minutes behind! I didn’t have time to call HR in the subway and taxied over to the building (the ride took 5 minutes).

I am now in the process of writing a thank-you email but have no clue how to address that one mistake. Would thanking them for their understanding and accommodation be good enough?

Assuming that you apologized when you arrived, I don’t know that you need to bring it up again. Maybe as a parenthetical, like “(and thanks again for your graciousness when I was a few minutes late — I was mortified!”), but making a bigger focus of it than that will come across weirdly, I think.

4. Registering for conferences when I might have left my job by the time they happen

My boss recently told me that he’d like to send me to some upcoming conferences for professional development — which is great, as I’ve been at my job for over two years now and really want to learn some new things outside of my office. However, I’ve also been job searching for since the summer and plan to keep doing so, since I’m dissatisfied with my job and my salary (I’ve been refused a raise due to a tight budget, despite glowing performance reviews). Some of the conferences in question are pretty far off — for example, one is in June. There would definitely be enough time for me to find a different job before then, if things worked out.

How exactly do I navigate a situation where I’d like to attend professional development opportunities in the near future but I also want to get out of my current job ASAP, which, if I did, would mean I wouldn’t be available to attend any of those conferences? My boss would be footing the bill, and I don’t know what would happen if I said yes to a conference, he paid for it, and then I got a job somewhere else. I’d hope these conferences would be able to refund money if someone couldn’t attend, but I also don’t want to say no to any conferences that look great but don’t have a “no refund” policy, just on the off chance that I get another job. My boss doesn’t know I’m job searching, so unfortunately I can’t bring it up with him.

Make plans for your current job as if you’re going to be there long-term until you know for sure that you’re not.

People leave jobs all the time with outstanding business trips and conferences that they had planned to attend in the future and now won’t be able to. It’s just a normal part of doing business. Conference registrations are usually either refundable or transferable, but if they’re not, well, that’s just how this stuff goes. It wouldn’t be practical for people to never commit to this kind of thing just because they might leave before the event rolls around.

3 reader updates

Here are three updates from letter-writers who had their questions answered here recently.

1. My coworker emailed something crazy to our new boss and made it look like I was part of it (#2 at the link)

I followed your advice by emailing the incoming director. I kept the message short and the tone fairly light. I basically said that I wasn’t consulted or told about the message before it was sent, so I wasn’t sure why I was CC’ed or included at all, but that I was looking forward to working with him. The new director wrote back a very warm message so I felt good about it.

I later learned that saying something was the right thing to do because he had immediately asked the associate director named in the message what the deal was with my coworker, but was able to add that I had disavowed all knowledge, so that probably saved me some trouble.

I then did have a conversation with my coworker about not speaking for me. I don’t think he understood why, but he hasn’t done anything close to that again, so I guess that’s enough.

So, again, I think your advice and the support I received from the comments was spot on. I really appreciate it!

2. My new coworker won’t stop texting me

I took your response and the advice of commenters to heart and put my brutally honest side to work. The next time I saw this coworker in person, I told him I had re-thought the idea of us communicating outside of work because I didn’t want work intruding into my personal life, that I was reserving phone communication for close friends and family only.

My coworker was actually very understanding and told me he thought I would just want someone to vent to about my work because it is so stressful, and that he’d seen a lot of people get burnt out from bottling up their stress there. He said he respected my desire to leave work at the door. Since then, we have gotten along great in person. He still texts me a couple times a week, saying things like “I hope your night is going better” when he knows my morning at work didn’t go so well. Now that our relationship has boundaries, a few random well-wishes don’t bother me (although I still don’t respond). If these boundaries ever become unclear again, I will not hesitate to set things straight.

3. I thought my in-person interview was a phone interview

The owner of the company (who I really wanted to work with and was the reason I was so excited about the interview) moved out of the country to the almost exact opposite time zone and my interviewer was the only employee in the company (small local firm) at the time. She was managing 14 clients ON HER OWN with no help at all, so I can understand her insistence on a first interview in person; she needed to be able to respond to client requests and be available to them during a full day of interviewing. I did my best in the interview but didn’t get a call back, and boy was I glad. It’s hard enough starting in a new industry right out of college, but being one of two people working for 14 major clients was a little more than I was willing to take on at the moment.

I have a new job now with a larger staff who are all willing to share information and help with the learning process, so everything worked out! Thanks to everyone who gave me advice!

what to do when your new boss is hard to work with

A reader writes:

We have a new department head, who is my new direct manager (previously there was no one person supervising this group). Since she’s arrived, we’ve had problems with her understanding of how our existing procedures work. If you say, in a perfectly neutral or even friendly tone, “Normally when this happens, this is how we handle it,” she says she does not have time to do it that way or does not want to do it that way, or even “I have been in this for 30 years and I’ve never handled it that way.”

Now, I realize that some of our procedures may be different than what she’s experienced in the past, and I’m not saying our way of doing things is perfect. However, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to get things done because there is consistent and inflexible push-back to every request or suggestion.

Just this morning, I emailed her to remind her that we had an item that needed to be done today so we can push it out tomorrow. I even took pains to frame my question as “do you want to do this?” and when she said yes, I said in a very neutral tone, “Thanks for letting me know. If you would, please just get that to me as soon as possible, as it takes some time to filter, enter, and apply.” Her response was that she was preparing for a meeting tomorrow, and that meeting was her priority.

I will grant you, this company has a tendency to put things off until the last possible minute. But this meeting tomorrow has been planned since before she ever came on board with us. It has been on the calendar for months. It’s been talked about since our last large meeting. It has not snuck up on anyone. Neither has this other project, which normally is a very high priority. If she is ever asked about getting something in by a particular deadline, her response is an almost-automatic “I’m too busy for that” or “I have too many interruptions, and I cannot get that done.”

I’m supposed to be the assistant for her area of responsibility. I have tried to offer assistance and bring things to her attention before they’re due, and I have consistently been ignored or told that she already “has too many interruptions.” She can be hard to read because she always smiles and laughs, no matter what the topic of discussion is, or how busy she’s trying to tell you she is.

How do I deal with this?

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them).