where should you look for jobs?

A reader writes:

I’m a PhD student (worked for a couple years before returning for grad school) and am now looking for full time employment. You mentioned in a recent post that you don’t advertise on “big job banks” because of how many unqualified candidates you get. I’m trying to find fairly specific positions, and the big job sites are pretty bare of positions that are a good match.

Could you advise on what you use, or alternate ways to find these postings? I’ve tried professional societies and the chamber of commerce for locations I’m interested in (but have no current connections to), but other suggestions would be great.

First and foremost, I’d look at niche job boards that are specific to your field — the ones run by professional organizations or publications in your field or that simply target a specific field. For example, look at DICE, TechCrunch, or GitHub for I.T., Public Relations Society of America for communications, Chronicle of Philanthropy for fundraising, Idealist and Bridgespan for nonprofit, Ad Age for advertising, Roll Call for politics, CreativePro.com for graphic design, and so forth.

If you have no idea what niche job boards exist in your field, google the name of your field and the word “jobs” and see what comes up.

In some fields, LinkedIn can be useful for job searching — both in terms of their actual job postings and by being active in groups devoted to your field.

And if there are particular organizations you might want to work for, look at the job listings on their own website; you may find jobs listed there that haven’t been posted anywhere else.

What other suggestions do people have?

open thread – October 30, 2015

It’s the Friday open thread! The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please don’t repost it here, as it may be in the to-be-answered queue :)

colleagues keep interrupting my conversations, the carpool nose picker, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Employees keep interrupting my conversations with customers

I’m a new supervisor in a customer service environment, and my two employees have been at the company for at least five years each. One is five years older than me and the other is 15 years older than me.

I’ve worked in this type of environment for many years and am familiar with best practices and procedures. However, when a customer comes up to me and asks me a question, one of my coworkers will abruptly interject. Recently, I started saying “I’ve got it,” but they are still not getting the hint. I’m starting to feel that they might find me incompetent or they don’t trust my professional experience.

Stop hinting. You’re their manager, regardless of age, and the best thing you can do is to tell staff members clearly and directly what you want from them.

I’d say this: “Hey, when I’m talking with a customer, I prefer to manage the conversation myself. If I need assistance, I’ll of course come ask you.” Or, if you want to make sure they’re not responding to some concern that you don’t realize they have, you could say: “I’ve noticed that when I’m talking with a customer, you’ll sometimes interject to answer their question. I’d rather handle those conversations on my own. Have I given you reason to worry about my ability to give them the right information?”

I don’t think you’ll get any pushback, but if you do, you can simply say, “I appreciate you trying to help, but unless I ask otherwise, I’d like you to leave me to handle those conversations on my own.”

2. Carpooling with a disgusting nose picker

I desperately want the carpool nose picker to completely and permanently stop this form of personal maintenance while traveling in the carpool.

Point to note: The picker always sits in front passenger seat unless it’s picker’s turn to drive.

If picker wants to “pick and flick” in picker’s own vehicle or those of the other carpoolers, that’s one thing (still hugely gross), but when picker picks while sitting right next to me in MY car, I am equal parts disgusted and pissed off! I really want this behavior to stop, in my car in particular, although in the entire carpool would be ideal! Please advise.

Eeuww. This is gross, but also very straightforward: The only way this will stop is if you say something. The next time you see it happening, just say, “eeuww, please don’t do that in my car.” That should be enough to shame the picker, but if for some reason it continues after a direct request to stop, then say, “I asked you to stop that. I’m not willing to keep carpooling if you’re going to do that while we’re riding together.” And/or, “YOU ARE FLICKING THINGS FROM YOUR NOSE ALL OVER MY CAR. Stop.”

Seriously. This isn’t one where you need to find magic words; just be direct.

3. Telling a client not to bring my former coworker to lunch

I am in sales and have a very good client who now works with someone I used to work with. I really do not care of this ex-coworker and have not seen her since she left. I asked the client out to lunch and she has asked me if the ex-coworker could come to the lunch! How do I politely say no and not hurt my client’s feelings?

You could try something like, “Oh, I’d love to catch up with just me and you” and hope that she gets the hint. But beyond that, I don’t think there’s much you can do — this is a client relationship, not a personal one, and if she wants to include her colleague, I don’t think there’s a graceful way to tell her not to. (But I’m really interested in hearing if other people have other ideas on ways to do it.)

4. Application system didn’t let me submit a cover letter — should I try to send one now?

Today I submitted an application through a form on the organization’s website, but by the time I got all the way through and hit submit, I realized there had been no place to attach a cover letter. Perhaps I should have attached my cover letter and resume as one document, but there was no indication I should do that, and I assumed there would be an opportunity to upload a letter on a later page. After I submitted the form, I received an automatic response: “Your resume has been received. Should we determine that your experience and skill set match our requirements, we will contact you. We are only able to contact those individuals who are selected for interviews. If you do not hear from us, we have not been able to best match your qualifications to a current open position.”

What I’m wondering is whether it would be inappropriate to respond with a cover letter, explaining that I had not seen any place to put one in the application but feel it’s important to give them a sense for why I’d be a fit for the position beyond the bullet points in my resume. What do you think about this?

Nah, don’t do it. If these people cared about cover letters, they wouldn’t have created an application process that excludes them. They’re apparently in the category of employers who aren’t interested in cover letters. (I object to this category’s very existence, but it does exist.) It would have been fine to include one with your resume (as all one document), but it’s not worth going back and trying to submit it separately now.

5. Can my employer call me while I’m home sick?

I am currently off sick from work due to anxiety attacks. My employer has just tried to phone me at home. I know it was work, as it showed up on my Caller ID. Are they allowed to call me at home? As this has now made me more nervous, I feel this is a setback to my recovery. I have to have a blood test tomorrow to see if all is okay there, but I still feel they should not have done this.

Yes, they’re allowed to call you. If you’re on regular sick leave, there’s no restrictions on them contacting you. If you’re on FMLA, they can contact you to inform you that you need to re-certify your FMLA leave or your intended return date, or they contact you about work questions “within reason” (like where a documented is located or the password for a file, not to do actual work).

how to decline to be a reference for a former coworker

A reader writes:

An old coworker of mine recently got let go from her job. Back in the day, we used to be good friends. She is applying to my current employer and asked me to be a reference.

I am hesitant to be one, as I know of some past work performance issues that are likely still present from when we originally worked together. Said issues may also be the reason that she was let go.

To make things more complicated, I see this person often. Also, we both work in the same industry and I don’t know what connections the people who hire at my job might have with my previous work with this individual. If this person was let go for what I have heard through sources, and via my own intuition, how do I politely tell this person that I cannot be her reference?

A few different options:

* Be honest: “I know you struggled with X and Y at Teapots Inc. I also know those may not be issues at other jobs, but it means I can’t be a really strong reference. I’m sorry I can’t help with this!”

* Say you don’t feel like you can speak to her work since you didn’t manage her: “I don’t think I’d be a great reference since I wasn’t in a position to really see your work the way a manager would be.”

* Attribute it to the friendship: “I’m not comfortable giving references for friends, since I know that it biases me and can potentially harm my credibility.”

* Be vague: “Hmmm, I don’t think I’d be the best person for that. I’m sorry!” or “I’d love to help you in some other way, but I don’t think I can be a reference from our time at Teapots Inc.” (With these, you’d want to be prepared for her to ask why. If she does, you could then use one of the other options on this list — but not everyone will push back and ask why, so it’s possible this could get you off the hook.)

To complicate this further, even if you’re not a reference for her, since you know she’s applying for a job with your current company, you might have an obligation to discreetly give the hiring manager a heads-up about what you do know of her work. Particularly if your company is a smaller one, a lot of hiring managers would be rightly pissed off if they ended up hiring someone who you knew from firsthand experience wasn’t going to be right for the job and you didn’t share that with them ahead of time. That’s not always the case, but if your company is small or you know/work pretty closely with the hiring manager, at a minimum you probably need to say, “I used to work with Jane Smith, who’s applying for your X role. Let me know if you’d like any information about her.”

how to talk so that people listen to you

Ever feel like you’re not being heard in meetings, or that your boss never sees things your way? It might be the way you’re talking; the way you present your thoughts can have a huge impact on how much weight people give what you’re saying. In fact, fairly or not, the way you talk can sometimes carry more weight than the substance of what you’re saying.

Here are four keys for talking in a way that will increase the odds that you’re really heard.

1. Start with the upshot. Not doing this is probably the #1 way to lose people’s attention, especially if you’re talking to a busy executive. You might think that starting with the background details will help make your ultimate point clearer, but the person you’re talking to may not want to listen to 10 minutes of background before discovering what your point is. Instead, start with the upshot – in other words, the specific request that you’re making or the key piece of information you need to impart – and then fill in details only if they’re needed. Communicating this way means that the person you’re talking with will probably be better positioned to process the details (since they’ll know why they matter), and they’ll be more willing to make time to listen to you in the future (since they’ll know you’ll communicate concisely and treat their time respectfully).

2. Be clear about any action you’re suggesting.  Clearly state what outcome you’re looking for, such as input or approval for something, so that the person is clear on what they should be considering. And if you’re just filling the person in on something you think they should be aware of, say that too. Most people find it really helpful to hear “this is just an FYI for you right now” at the start of a conversation rather than waiting through the whole discussion to hear what they might be asked to do.

3. Pay attention to conversational cues. Part of communicating is observing your audience. If the person you’re talking to seems rushed or distracted, that’s a cue for you to get to the point quickly (or possibly even to ask, “Is this a bad time to talk about this?”). If the person seems lost or confused, pause and ask what you can clarify (“I’m not sure I’m conveying this correctly – is this making sense?”). Generally, pay attention to the signals the other person is giving off; in most cases, they’re there if you look for them.

4. Seek to understand the other person’s perspective. Sometimes if you feel you’re not being heard, it’s because you’re not hearing the other person. For example, if you’re pushing heard to launch a new initiative and your manager is telling you that the budget is tight right now, you’re going to come across as tone-deaf if you don’t heed that information and at least incorporate it into your thinking. Other times, the person might not be as forthcoming with their perspective and you may need to seek it out. If you’re sensing resistance, don’t keep charging ahead; pause and ask questions to try to better understand what’s going on with your audience. You’ll often get insight that will change your own thinking, or at least allow you to approach the issue more persuasively.

 

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase’s blog.

have you ever had a spooky experience at work?

Did you ever work somewhere haunted? Feel the ghost of your predecessor marooned in your office? Encounter an evil spirit lurking in the copier?

We’re celebrating Halloween two days early. If you’ve had spooky moments at work — or perhaps just odd unexplained occurrences — share them in the comment section. (Simply being haunted by a previous terrible job does not count here!)

keeping visitors from wandering our office, flooded with employee referrals for bad candidates, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. How can we keep salespeople from wandering about our office after their appointments?

I am the receptionist for a company that has about 70 employees in this facility. 99% of the people entering the office will stop and sign in. The problem I have is that when a salesman has an appointment with an employee, after he is finished with the meeting, he walks around the office “popping his head into other offices.” It is disturbing to the assistants too. These salesmen will sometimes will stop and stare at the papers on the desks and interrupt people’s work. How can we put in place some type of system/policy to assure that once the appointment is completed, they return to the reception area? Even if they have another appointment with another person, they need to sign in again.

The most effective way of doing it would be to enlist the employees who the salespeople are meeting with. Ideally, when the meeting is up, the employee would say, “Let me walk you back up front” and actually accompany the salesperson back to reception. That makes it less likely that the salesperson is going to try go back and wander through the offices … but if they do try to, at that point, you can speak up and say, “Did you have another appointment?” and if the answer is no, “I can’t let you go back unaccompanied.” (Stand up when you say this if they look like they’re going to just head back anyway. Standing up tends to carry a subtext of “I’m about to block your way.”)

2. I’m being flooded with employee referrals for mediocre candidates

Where I work, our employees seem to want to get every single person they are acquainted with a job at our company. On a normal day, I have around five employees approach me to give me the name of their friend who applied. It gets very tiring because 99.9% of the time, these referrals are not exactly up to par. How can I tell employees that their friends/family will not be receiving a phone call to come and interview without telling them why?

Be direct: “She didn’t meet the qualifications for that position, but thank you for sending her our way.” Or — if you haven’t reviewed the person’s application yet — “I’ll definitely take a look. I know we have a competitive pool for that position, but if she’s a strong candidate, we’ll reach out to her.”

Because it’s a chronic problem, you might also consider giving your staff as a whole more information about what it takes to get an interview. You could say something like, “I’ve noticed that we’re getting a lot of referrals — and it’s great that you’d like to see your family and friends work here — so I wanted to share some information on what we’re looking for in candidates. First and foremost, if someone doesn’t meet the posted qualifications, it’s very unlikely that we’ll interview them, so you should encourage anyone you know who’s applying to make sure they’re well matched with the role and that their application materials make that clear. We also really put a premium on good communication skills; we get a lot of candidates with sloppy written materials or no cover letter or who don’t follow application instructions, so you might encourage your referrals to pay attention to those things as well.”

The other thing I’d look at: Are you offering referral bonuses, as some companies do? If so, it might be encouraging people to refer candidates willy-nilly, and it might be worth looking at whether it’s causing more harm than good.

3. My company wouldn’t interview me for an internal position that I’m qualified for

Recently, I applied for an internal position within my company that I know I am fully qualified for, but was passed up for an interview because I’ve only been here a little over a year. The company I work for uses Nowlin testing to help determine who is compatible and I tested extremely well.

According to what they were looking for in a candidate, I met all the qualifications as far as education and skills, and I had some experience with the software program that they use. When I asked our HR coordinator why I was passed up on for an interview, she stated she had two candidates who were here longer than I was, and they were being slotted for interviews. I later found out that one of the people who was interviewed had only been here about four months longer than I have been here, and additionally, I know she doesn’t have the educational qualifications requested on the job posting. Do I have any rights, legally or otherwise, to make sure I am able to be interviewed?

No, not unless there’s reason to think that you were passed up because of your race, religion, sex, national origin, age (if over 40), disability, or other protected class. Employers aren’t legally obligated to interview internal applicants, even qualified ones, and they’re not obligated to run a “fair” hiring process — just one that doesn’t violate federal anti-discrimination laws.

It’s possible that your company won’t consider people for internal transfers if they’ve been there less than 18 months, or that they don’t think you’d be as strong a match for the position as others, or that they think you’re difficult to work with, or the hiring manager just doesn’t like you, or your current manager isn’t thrilled with your performance, or all sorts of other possibilities. Also, keep in mind that just meeting the job’s qualifications isn’t enough — lots of candidates will meet the qualifications, so then it comes down to who’s BEST out of that group.

You can certainly ask what you can do to make yourself a stronger candidate for next time, though.

4. Following up on a raise request

I work part-time as a legal assistant for a one-man law firm, and have been there for about a year and a half. I work about 30 hours a week during the school year (I’m in college), and full-time when school isn’t in session. Our office manager, who is usually full-time, recently went on an extended medical leave, leaving me to handle her role as well as my own, in addition to training a new employee to pick up the slack in answering phones and doing simple filing. I’ll likely be handling most of this work even after the office manager comes back, as she’ll be returning in a few months on a part-time basis.

I requested a raise last week, citing my increased responsibilities and performance improvements since my last review, and my boss agreed that I deserve an increase in pay. However, he said he was unsure whether he could give me one in his current financial situation, and told me he would let me know Monday. Monday has now come and gone with no response. I feel a little hurt that he hasn’t spoken to me about it, and would have been less anxious if he had given me a timely “no.” How long should I wait before broaching the issue with him, and what’s the best way to ask?

It’s reasonable to follow up now. I’d say, “I was hoping to touch base with you about the possibility of a raise, like we discussed last week. Is there a good time for you to talk in the next few days?”

5. How far back can I push an interview when I’m sick?

I received an interview offer via email and was asked to let them know when I would be available. In other words, they’re allowing me to pick an interview date. Problem is: I’m sick–very, very sick. I was wondering if 1-2 weeks is too far out to request an interview date. I could let her know about my hospitalization, but I don’t want to come off unreliable or full of excuses. If I push it back too far, it may come off as uninterested–and I’m sure that they have a line of applicants ready to interview asap (this IS my dream job after all). However, I really need a MINIMUM of a week just to have the strength to walk through the door; I wish it was just a cold/flu where you pop a couple of Dayquils and just show up to do your best.

Is two weeks too long or should I schedule it a week from now (and try to make it through the interview without fainting)? Would you say that even a week is too long to make them wait?

Tell them what’s going on! Explaining that you’re in the hospital isn’t going to look unreliable or full of excuses! (And someone who thinks that is someone you don’t want to work for.) I’d say this: “I’m so excited for the chance to come in and talk with you. Is it at all possible to schedule for the week of ___? I’m currently in the hospital (I will be fine, but need a week to recover), but would very much like to talk with you once I’m recovered. Is (date) too far off?”

It’s possible that they need to wrap up interviews before then, but it doesn’t sound like you can come in earlier anyway — so if that’s the case, that’s the case. But you’re much more likely to get a positive result by explaining what’s going on than by being vague.

how quickly should you return calls and emails about interviewing?

A reader writes:

I am currently looking for internships and have submitted my resume and cover letter via email. I asked my mom for advice, and she says to reply back as fast as possible when they email me back — that I should email them back within a few hours to show how eager I am. Being currently in college, I usually have time to check email in the morning or at night. I don’t have email on my phone.

My mom has advised me using several of the bad job-search tips you talk about and hasn’t job hunted since the early 1990s, so I am sort of reluctant to take her advice right now. She also thinks replying within hours is part of working life. What sort of speed in replying is acceptable these days?

I’d try to reply within 24 hours. If you wait longer than that, you risk looking uninterested or having the employer simply book up their interview slots with other candidates.

But no, you don’t need to respond back within a few hours. Employers are used to dealing with people who have jobs or otherwise are occupied during the day, and they don’t expect you to be chained to your email and prioritizing them above all else that’s going on. They understand that you might be working, or in school, or camping, or sick, or out of town, or at an all-day movie festival, or out of cell range, or all sorts of other things.

Or at least, reasonable ones do. You can always find some random ridiculous recruiter who thinks it’s an outrage that you didn’t respond immediately to her email, but those are outliers, and you shouldn’t peg your behavior to outlier expectations. You should peg it to normal, mainstream expectations, which say that responding within one business day is fine.

Also, about your mom’s point that you need to “show how eager you are”: You should show that you’re enthusiastic, yes, but that’s different than “so eager to talk to someone about a job (which at this point you know little about) that you’re willing to disrupt your regular life just to ensure they get a call-back within a few hours when the reasonable business standard is within one day.” That doesn’t demonstrate eagerness. It’s not even likely to register with the employer any differently than if you got back to them within a day. It’s just going to inconvenience you (it sounds like) without a significant pay-off.

To be clear, if you can call/email them back faster than that with a minimum of inconvenience to yourself, you should … because it’s good to have a buffer in case you end up playing phone tag, and because stories abound of employers filling their interview slots and then not bothering to get back to other people who they’d earlier reached out to. But there’s no expectation that you’ll dramatically change your daily habits just to return a call a few hours earlier than you would otherwise.

should I take off my engagement ring for job interviews?

A reader writes:

My fiance and I have been engaged for a little over a year, and his mom gave us her old engagement ring as a gift. It’s beautiful, and few people even notice it unless it’s pointed out to them.

However, I was wondering if it’s appropriate for job interviews. I ask because I grew up in a conservative town where all the women would take off their wedding or engagement rings for interviews. While I know employers cannot discriminate, I also know that they don’t have to tell you why they don’t hire you. Granted, I’m not especially old school, live in a progressive city, and am just as career driven as most single people my age — my fiance even jokes about being the “house husband” in the distant future when we have kids. At the same time, I’ve received advice from both sides. What call would you make?

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them).

Read an update to this letter here.

interview with a prison librarian

Recently, a commenter, Oryx, mentioned that she used to work as a prison librarian, and I wanted to learn more. She graciously agreed to do an interview for us, and here’s the Q&A.

How did you end up in the job? And how long were you there?

I answered an ad I found through Indeed.com, but which was originally posted on my state’s job board (even though I worked for a for-profit prison that was not managed by the state). To be honest, when I first applied, I didn’t realize it was a prison because neither the name nor the ad made it sound super obvious, and when I got called for an interview I almost didn’t go. But I had just finished grad school, and it was right when the economy was sinking and the librarianship field was in dire straits, so if nothing else I figured I’d get good interviewing experience. But they ended up hiring me and I was there for 21 months. It was all-male, minimum security. We had a strong substance abuse program, so the majority of inmates were sent there if they were on drug crimes or DUI.

Tell us a bit about what a typical day was like.

The prison library was open six days a week, two shifts per day: either the morning and afternoon or afternoon and evening. I’d get to work about 30 minutes before the library opened. If it was the morning, there would already be inmates waiting outside the door. If it was the afternoon, I’d get there right at the count time before lunch so the yard would be empty as they were all in their bunks. Each shift was open for about 3 or 4 hours. Then we’d close for an hour or two for count and the meal, then reopen.

During that half hour, I’d make copies or print documents that had been left from the day before. Inmates paid for copies and print-outs but only legal documents could be copied or printed so I had to check everything first (on the computers they only had access to Lexis-Nexis and an open office word processing program). After that, I set everything up for the day, including turning on lights, setting out sign-in/out sheets, making sure tables and chairs were in order.

Most of my day was spent in more of a manager position, as I had inmate works at the circulation desk who did all the checking in and out of books (we stilled used the old-fashioned card pockets in the back of the book) or handling newspapers and magazines. There was also a law library where the computers and typewriters were, which was also staffed by a handful of inmates. I became a notary as part of the position so I would spend a lot of the time notarizing documents, helping with book recommendations (although my workers got good at this, too), cataloging donated books, keeping circulation stats updated for my monthly report and, of course, I was there to maintain control. (I also spent a ridiculous amount of time maintaining the rules: telling inmates to make sure they sign in and out, make sure their shirts were tucked in, make sure they take their hats off, no food and drink. It’s the prison, we had a lot of policies so that was a big part of my job).

The afternoon shift was by far the busiest, because the newspapers and magazines came in during lunch. There was always a delay so the papers were a couple days behind, but the inmates didn’t seem to care. We carried USA Today and most of the major papers from around the state. Magazines were pretty broad interests like Sports Illustrated, Entertainment Weekly, Car and Driver, things like that.

Because we were minimum security, the inmates were free to come and go when the yard was open. The only exception to this was when Daylight Saving Time ended each year, and during the evening shift, it would be dark in the evening. Once the lights out in the yard turned on, the inmates were not allowed to leave the library until it closed and only after I took a count and called control up front and let them know how many inmates were leaving. I’d do a “last call” type of situation before sunset and after that they were stuck in the library until we closed. The inmates hated that and would try to leave early, but there wasn’t anything I could do (and even if they did leave early, there were always correctional officers out patrolling the grounds, so even if they stepped outside they’d usually get told to get back inside from both the COs and me).

On Fridays, I would go down to the segregation unit where inmates who have been temporarily removed from the general population stayed. I’d go around cell to cell and ask if there were any books they wanted to read then I’d bring them those books on Saturdays. There was a small bookshelf of titles that I changed out once a month or so.

I’m sure that when you went into librarianship, it wasn’t so you could spend time telling adults to tuck in their shirts. How did you adjust to that aspect of the job?

It was kind of like being a glorified babysitter in many ways. The inmate workers were there to do most of the day-to-day front line stuff of checking books out and putting books away on the shelves. I helped with readers advisory and cataloging, things that were a bit outside their scope. But since there was no guard, I was kind of the guard by default, so it was mostly my job to keep the volume down, make sure interactions didn’t escalate, that sort of thing.

Truthfully, there were a lot of rules at the prison I didn’t agree with and still don’t, like the shirt stuff. But if security came in on rounds and saw inmates with shirts untucked or hats on, both the inmate and I would get reprimanded since I was the one not doing my job by letting them come in all untucked. So part of adjusting was doing it because I didn’t want to get in trouble.

What kind of training did you get that was specific to working in a prison?

My very first day was actually spent off site at an unarmed self-defense class that everyone had to take before being allowed to set foot on the prison unaccompanied. We all had panic buttons, but I was always in the library on my own; the guard was next door. Guns were not allowed within the fence, so unarmed self-defense was the only way to go (luckily I never had to put those skills to use). They also had a two-week orientation I had to go through, although because of the timing I’d been there for about six months before I attended. Then once a year, we’d go through a week-long refresher course. We learned about the different departments and, for whatever reason, the security one was always everyone’s favorite. Several decades ago, our state had a very famous prison riot take place and they’d walk us through step by step what happened. Looking back, it’s weird to think that was the class employees loved the most but I think it was the shock factor of it all. Part of orientation also included a session where we looked for fake contraband: they turned one of the medical rooms into a cell and hid contraband, and as a group we were supposed to search the room to get a sense of the sheer creativity these inmates had.

A while back, I went through a training program to volunteer to teach courses in a local jail. (At the end of the program, they ran background checks and wouldn’t let me actually start teaching because I have civil disobedience in my background, which apparently made me a security risk.) Anyway, the training was fascinating. One thing they really stressed was that we should constantly be on guard against being conned — that if we let down our guard at any point, an inmate would take advantage of it (like by convincing us to bring in contraband, or give them money, or who knows what else). I’m sure there was good reason for that piece of the training from a security and safety standpoint, but I still suspect they over-emphasized it (probably to ensure people took it seriously, I suppose). Anyway, does that resonate with your experience?

I don’t know if I would say such training is over-emphasized because it does happen. I think it probably seems over-emphasized because you go into this thinking you won’t think you’ll fall for it, or you’ll be able to know when you’re being conned, and you’re smart and won’t be a victim, and that just isn’t always the case. Especially since they start small, like any con. It’s a long game, so, no, they aren’t going to come right out and ask if you’ll bring in contraband or bring in money. Like, they’ll just start with flattery and see how you react to that and go from there. I have red hair and at the time it was down to my waist, really gorgeous. But during work hours I kept it up in a bun or braid, because every time I wore it down I’d get compliments from inmates which were innocuous but within context borderline inappropriate because of where we were.

Relationships between staff and inmates were obviously a big no-no and, again, it seems on the surface like such an obvious thing to stay away from but — and I’m not exaggerating — every six months, like clockwork, another female employee was getting “walked out” (or fired, basically escorted off the property) for having an inappropriate relationship with an inmate. Some were I think genuinely romantic in nature, with relationships continuing once the inmate was released. But others were the reflection of the woman being conned. Several were married. One in particular was found out because she’d written a note to the inmate which the inmate kept and said note was discovered during a routine search. Imagine getting to go home and tell your husband that story the day you lose your job.

I had an inmate working for me who had been there before I started, and I was told that my predecessor had had some kind of relationship with him, though I don’t know to what extent (gossip ran like wildfire). Even being too friendly would have counted and, well, anyway, I had the job because she was fired. So now I was managing him, and from the very beginning he was clearly trying to go the flattery route and eager to help and please me and tried a bit too hard. He said something or other that clearly crossed a line so I wrote him up for it, and as soon as he knew that I wasn’t going to fall for it like the woman before me, he did a 180 and pretty much never spoke to me again unless absolutely necessary.

Truthfully, if they were trying to con you for anything it was mostly for special privileges, like you looking the other way while they took the fruit out of the mess hall after breakfast (fruit couldn’t go to the dorms because it could be fermented and turned into hooch) or in the library it could have something like letting them have two newspapers at a time instead of one. That sort of thing. That’s why consistency was the key with all interactions, though it didn’t always go over very well.

That makes sense. So, what did you like best about the work? What was the hardest/most challenging?

I really, really enjoyed working with the inmates. It was a bit of a culture shock for me at first but once I got settled I realized that it was really just like a normal library: I had regular patrons who came in the same time every day (and, of course, I had those regular problem patrons as well) and I had to help them find books to read or access legal information. I’ve worked in libraries for 15 years, and this really wasn’t that different from the suburban public library I worked at in high school.

The hardest/most challenging had to do with patron privacy and access to information. As a librarian, those are two ideals that are of utmost importance in our field, but they don’t exist in the prison, let alone the prison library. Things that were deemed too violent or explicit were not allowed, although we didn’t have a specific list of banned books; it was mostly subjective. The inmates in the segregation unit (aka “the hole”) aren’t allowed to have hardback books because of safety concerns, so if the book they wanted was only available in hardback, I wasn’t allowed to give it to them. On the issue of patron privacy, if an inmate came in asking for Mein Kampf, he was allowed to have the book but I was supposed to inform security so they could keep an eye on the inmate to see if there was any white supremacy gang-related activity going forward or in his history.

Going in, I think I had a vague sense that these sorts of situations would come up, but I had no idea how challenging it would be for my sense of self as a librarian. If anything, it reaffirmed my initial desire to get into the field to support patron privacy and access to information, something I still strongly advocate for today.

What surprised you the most from doing this work? 

I was surprised by how fulfilling it turned out to be, especially when it came to helping inmates find books or information. My favorite was when an inmate roughly my age came in looking for a book to read. He dropped out of high-school and was currently in our GED program and decided that if he was going to be stuck here he might as well make use of his time by reading all those books he should have read in high-school but didn’t. So I decided to start with The Great Gatsby, and all I told him was that it was about a gangster. He checked it out right away and within days was back asking for another book just like it.

I also used a white board out in the library foyer to share an “On This Day in History” factoid. Some inmates would stop by just to see what the new event was and on days I didn’t work it wouldn’t always get updated by my cover so they’d often want to know yesterday’s, too.

What didn’t you know when you started that ended up being important?

What I didn’t know when I started was how important the library was to the inmates. Because there was no guard in there and no bars on the windows or anything like that, it was the only place in the entire facility that didn’t feel like it was part of a prison. They could come for a couple hours of day, read the local paper from their hometown, hang out with their friends, etc. I worked hard to make it feel like a safe, “normal” space, and the inmates thanked me by looking out for me in their own ways. There were two instances where inmates were, ahem, pleasuring themselves in the library while looking at me. One I didn’t even know about until after because one of my workers went up to the guy, whispered in his ear to basically get the fuck out, and the guy did. My worker only told me because he wanted to make sure I was aware and to be on the lookout in the future. The other guy, I witnessed in action and had to call the guard over. One of the other inmates who had been in the library and saw it later told the same guard to confirm that it had happened when the masturbator started to deny it.

I was also completely unprepared for how much I’d learn about the law. It also made me a stronger advocate against the death penalty. I’d always been against it, but this experience just confirmed it. I saw guys in their 70s and 80s and they were only in there for a couple of years and it was rough, but they were going to get out eventually. Being stuck in a maximum security prison at that age is a fate worse than death.

I’m picturing the role being one of the few in a prison where you could transcend the strict control and power dynamics that must be hallmarks of prisoners’ interactions with other people who worked there. (Or maybe I’m being terribly naive.) Did you find that that was true?

Absolutely. I wasn’t a corrections officer, it wasn’t my job to keep them in line quite so much, so I do think I had a bit more … flexibility in terms of my interactions with the inmates. Nothing that crossed any lines (of which there were many), and I wouldn’t say I became friends with any of them necessarily, but I didn’t see them as ducks I had to keep in a row every single day. I wasn’t there to remind them they were in prison. So, for instance, I managed about a dozen inmates at a single time, and whenever I hired a new inmate (or was assigned one by the job person), I would allow one of my more senior workers to train the new guy. I wanted to try and give them as much autonomy as possible within allowed limitations and also encourage them to do and be more than just an inmate in prison.

I think that went hand-in-hand with the inmates wanting to look out or protect me because I wasn’t seen as one of the “bad guys.” I was frequently told the library was one of the more popular places to work because I was a good manager (which is funny because I hated being a manager, and not just because of where I worked).

I’ve always been really interested in prison reform and convinced that we’re doing ourselves as a society no favors with the way we handle incarceration (one of the reasons I wanted to volunteer at the jail). Aside from what you mentioned about the death penalty, did you come out of that job with any other takeaways about what we’re doing right / what we’re doing wrong?

We need to decriminalize drugs; that entire situation needs reform. And whether you are pro-drug-reform or not, it’s impossible to ignore that the justice system targets black men, especially when it comes to drug-related offenses. Our population was almost nearly 50/50 black and white, and if a black man was in our prison, there was probably a 90% chance he was there on a drug crime. Considering we were a substance abuse facility, with NA and AA classes, it was ridiculous to see the imbalance between the people of color in on drug crimes compared to the small number of white men in on drug crimes. And, of course, the white men almost always had shorter sentences.

I also think education within the prison system needs attention and money. We had a GED program and graduation ceremonies and everything, but I think more prisons should offer trade classes or programs, especially if you’re dealing with inmates who are in on shorter sentences and need to have a skill when they leave. We were fortunate enough to live in a state where a university offers a mail-in degree programs specifically for inmates, but paying for that from inside is near impossible. So even if an inmate wanted to set himself up for success when he leaves, he has the cards stacked against him.

I think we also need to educate society on how helping inmates succeed after release only helps all of us. I set up a section in the library with information related to re-entry resources like career centers who will work with ex-convicts, or starting your own business, stuff like that. But I can only do so much from inside; when they get out the world has a very different view of what it means to be an ex-con, and so their chances of being successful are limited simply because of society’s negative view. I do hear more about pockets that are starting businesses specifically to give jobs to men (and women) who had formerly been incarcerated and that’s a good start, but there needs to be more. They had jobs when they were incarcerated, they are hard workers, and most wanted to just do their time and go home and start fresh, but if the support system isn’t there, they’ll just be back.

Recidivism is high and it’s not only because you’re dealing with convicts. Some of it is just a cycle they can’t get out of because they don’t have any other options. If you have a good set-up selling drugs, making money, and setting your own hours and then you catch a case and are in inside for a year or two, when you get out, you know nobody is going to hire you, so you might as well keep doing what you had been doing to put food on the table for your family. It’s really heartbreaking because in most cases, these are just men who made one stupid decision and got caught. We’ve all made stupid decisions and haven’t been caught. Or we’ve been caught but have gotten away with it because of inherent privilege. I know the fates of some of the inmates who worked for me, either because of social media or I’ve even seen some walking around the city, but most of them, I have no idea what happened to them and if they managed to make a life once they got out.