coworker didn’t warn us about bed bugs, was I blacklisted, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Coworker didn’t warn us about bed bugs when we traveled to satellite office

I work at a place with two offices. There is a group of professionals in our office who meet up every month to discuss trends in our field of work. We normally meet at the main office, but one of the employees in the group asked that we rotate back, at least once, to the satellite office. Well, the whole group (75% of whom works at the main office) agreed that they would rotate and have the meeting at the satellite office. When we got there for the meeting, one of the employees who works out of the satellite office made a remark in passing during the meeting that the room next door is being treated for a bed bug infestation. She actually had the nerve to say this jokingly!

I am really annoyed that an entire group of professionals at that satellite office did not warn us about the bed bug situation–if they had, we obviously would not have gone there and it doesn’t matter that the bedbugs were found in the room next door. I saw one of the satellite employees and asked her why they didn’t warn the rest of the group about the bed bugs and she said, “I guess we didn’t even think about it.” I feel like their behavior was so extremely unprofessional, inconsiderate, immature and discourteous that I don’t even think we should accommodate them anymore by rotating! Now, I am paranoid about any bite I get because bed bugs can make you lose a lot of money and belongings since you need to throw these things out!

I was thinking of just keeping the upcoming meetings at the main office and if the satellite folks want to come, so be it–why bring it up when the end result will be us not meeting there anyway? Another factor here is that even when we do rotate and have these meetings at the satellite office, the satellite employees are always strolling in 10-20 minutes late to a meeting that we’re holding at their office to accommodate them! They are just generally inconsiderate, but other than the group meetings, I don’t have to work with them because they’re in a different department (and obviously, a different office). How should I approach this situation?

It’s perfectly reasonable to say, “We aren’t going to hold meetings there until the bed bug situation is 100% resolved. We don’t want to risk bringing them back with us.” (It’s weird that they themselves aren’t concerned about bringing them home, which makes me wonder if there’s something else going on there.)

It might also be reasonable — although it’s a little less clear cut — to say “because most of us are in the main office, we’d like to keep holding the meetings here, since that’s the most convenient for the majority of attendees.” (There’s an argument that that isn’t really fair and you should rotate at least once in a while, if not every single meeting … but it also sounds like you might not be terribly upset if it meant that they didn’t attend as frequently.)

And if you are holding any meetings at their office, it’s definitely reasonable to say, “We need to start these on time. Can you commit to being ready to go by 6 p.m. so we’re not starting late?”

Read an update to this letter here.

2. Should I mention my disability in an interview when an employer says they encourage disabled people to apply?

I have juvenile/type 1 diabetes, which I’m pretty sure qualifies as a disability under the ADA. I see employers with language in their posting such as: “We are strongly committed to achieving excellence through intellectual diversity and strongly encourage applications from persons of color, women, persons with disabilities, the LGBT community, veterans, and members of other groups that are under-represented on university faculties.” How do people make it known that they are members of one of these groups, such as a person with a disability, during the application submission/hiring process? I have never addressed my disability with employers during the interview or hiring process, preferring to keep it quiet until I have started working. For context, I am in the legal profession and thinking about entering the teaching market (scary!).

That sort of language isn’t there to prompt you to disclose disabilities, but rather just to signal to you that they’re a particularly welcoming environment (for example, that they’re not likely to consider medical accommodations a hassle — at least in theory).

There are a few exceptions to this; some programs do give veterans and disabled people preference in hiring, but in those cases it’s likely to be asked as a formal question in their application process and still wouldn’t be something you’d need to casually mention in an interview.

3. Would a new job let me work remotely two months a year?

I’m a graduate student in a relatively specialized field. For the past few years, I’ve been lucky enough to have a job that I love where I can grow and develop my skills, and with great and supportive coworkers. The problem is that this job is seasonal. I would like to start applying to part-time jobs related to my field of study so that I have steady work throughout the year. I’m wondering whether I could reasonably try to have my cake and eat it too—that is, how strange and/or unreasonable would it be for me to try to negotiate with a new job to let me take two months to work remotely while I return to this seasonal job? Is there some other way I can keep working at my seasonal job?

It’s not impossible, but it would be pretty unusual. It would depend on the work you were doing and the nature of the role, but most employers would be concerned at the prospect of you splitting your focus like that for two months. You’d also be asking them to tolerate what could be pretty significant inconvenience (to your coworkers as well) for something that won’t benefit them, and which risks signaling “I’m not committed enough to this job to let the other one go.”

I think you’re most likely to need to give up the seasonal job when you get a new job.

4. Employer is accidentally continuing a benefit after I left

I left a former employer a few months ago for a new job. The HR manager at the former employer is, to be mild, incompetent. I’ve spent many days making sure my paychecks were accurate, benefits were right, etc., and now I’m wondering what my responsibility (and possible liability) is if said HR manager fails to discontinue a benefit after I left employment.

I was receiving a transportation subsidy that goes directly to my travel card – this was the employer’s money, not mine. Although I left employment months ago, the subsidy continues to be placed on my card every month. Short of cancelling the account and opening a new one, I have no way of not using these benefits when they’re placed there (the deductions are automatic when I use the subway). I have let the HR manager know about this but never received a reply and the benefits still appear every month.

Am I liable for this somehow, given that it’s their error? I have no desire to take money from them, but it’s incredibly complicated for me to go around their error. I also don’t want to end up having to pay this money back. Any idea on how to deal with this?

It’s a good question. If they were continuing to pay you, they could indeed hold you to returning the money once they noticed it (although I’d love to know if there are time limits on that — there must be, but we need a lawyer to tell us for sure). But with benefits? I don’t know. I suspect that they wouldn’t bother, but I can see why you don’t want the possibility hanging out there.

I would alert your old manager to what’s happening, if you haven’t already. And then I would send one final note to the HR manager (ideally with her manager cc’d) saying that you’ve alerted her that this is happening and haven’t received a reply, can’t continue to chase her down to get it fixed, and so are making one final attempt to get it corrected but if they don’t take care of it, you’re not going to be responsible for getting the money back to them at some future date.

5. Did this company blacklist me?

I am a contractor and am in the market every six months or so. I was once at a company where I couldn’t get along with the manager, to the point that we wouldn’t say hello to each other. She didn’t extend my contract and I was out. After that, whenever I applied for an opening in that company, I never got called for an interview. Is it possible that she blacklisted me in th HR database or something?

Yes. It’s pretty normal, in fact, to mark people as ineligible for rehire if there are issues with them — and having a poor enough relationship with a manager that you refused to even say hello could definitely qualify as that (even if she was just as much to blame as you).

my insecure coworker keeps spying on me and trying to one-up me

A reader writes:

My former boss was all about giving orders, and when she did ask for my feedback on a project, she usually took credit for my ideas. She recently resigned and there have been some organizational shake-ups in my department. The result is that I’m getting more exposure to higher-ups, more responsibility, and a chance to contribute ideas to big projects. Overall, it has been great and I feel that I’ve been impressing the department head with the quality of my work.

My coworker, “Jake,” has been extremely threatened by this. We have the same title and job duties, but now that we’re no longer just following orders, I think it is becoming clear that I am more polished and more competent in general. And it probably doesn’t help that I am slightly younger than he is. That said, I’m not gunning for a promotion and I would never try to make him (or anyone) look bad — I’m just trying to keep my head down and get things done.

Jake’s behavior has gotten obnoxious over the past few weeks. If he sees me having a private conversation with my new boss (in his office!), he will forcefully insert himself into the conversation. In meetings, he just repeats what I say and talks in circles (most of his original ideas aren’t very good). If we are both copied on an email, he races to respond before I can (even when his response is unhelpful). It feels almost having an annoying little brother who can’t stand being “left out” of what the older kids are doing (ironic given the age difference).

However, the most annoying thing is that he has started “spying” on me when I am working. We have cubicles with low walls and we sit next to each other. He is constantly standing up and looking over my shoulder to see my computer screen, and when I turn around, he immediately sits back down. He’ll also make excuses to walk by my desk and linger behind me so he can stare at my screen (“dropping” things, choosing candy from my candy dish, etc.) It’s really bizarre, especially since I’m rarely working on anything juicy or confidential (aside from this email to you!) It’s gotten to a point where my other coworkers have started to notice and I have requested to work from home when I can just to avoid the feeling of being watched constantly. I have tried asking him if he needs anything, asked him if he’s looking for something, etc. but it hasn’t stopped him.

How do I address this with Jake? We actually had a friendly working relationship for about a year until our boss resigned. Should I bring this up with my new boss?

Jake sounds like he’s deeply insecure about his work and jealous of yours.

It also sounds like a lot of what he’s doing will be obvious to others, and you don’t need to worry about responding to it — I’d put in this category the forcefully joining your conversations with your boss, the repeating what you say, and the racing to respond to things before you do. I wouldn’t worry too much about finding a solution to those; it sounds like he’s sort of hanging himself with his own behavior there, and people will be able to see it (and will be able to spot that his responses aren’t helpful, whereas yours are).

The spying thing is super weird, and I’d just say something to him directly about it. For example: “Hey, I keep noticing you watching my screen. What’s up?” … Followed by, “Well, it’s really distracting. Could you stop?” (If he denies it, say, “I don’t think I’m imagining it; others keep commenting on it too. But I’ll point it out the next time I notice it” and then do.) There’s a decent chance that this will shame him into stopping, especially if you keep calling it out, turning to stare back at him when you notice him doing it, etc.

Also, any chance that you can reposition the way you sit so that he can’t see your screen as easily? And/or put something behind you so that he can’t walk behind you? (And/or put something on your screen that says “MOVE ALONG, JAKE”? Okay, not actually that. But I’d be tempted.)

You asked about bringing it up with your new boss. I wouldn’t. It’s weird and annoying, but it doesn’t quite rise to the level of needing boss intervention. I think you’re better off continuing to be awesome and letting Jake demonstrate his non-awesomeness in all the ways he sounds like he’s doing that.

Read an update to this letter here.

how to set goals that are real, not wishful thinking

As a manager, you want your staff setting and working toward clear, concrete goals. After all, goals are how you can measure progress, hold people accountable, and drive real results. But some teams set goals that aren’t “real” – they’re so lofty that they’re unlikely to come to fruition, and because people sense that, they’re not taken seriously and don’t truly shape the course of people’s work (thus defeating the purpose of setting goals to begin with).

Setting ambitious goals is important. It’s one of the practices that separates high-performing teams that make dramatic progress from those that just go about the ordinary course of business. But to have real power and truly drive your team’s work, they also need to be realistic. Otherwise, they’ll represent wishful thinking instead of real commitment.

Here’s how you can ensure your team’s goals aren’t just pie in the sky.

1. Insist that goals have plans behind them. Goals with no plans behind them aren’t real goals – they’re more like hopes. For a goal to be real, your team needs to have some idea of how they’ll reach it – what tactics you’ll use, and what a realistic path to success will look like. Tactics may end up changing, of course – but without any road map at all, you can’t reasonably have an idea of whether a goal is achievable or not.

2. Create short-term milestones. If you’re setting annual goals, you should also create shorter-term milestones for interim progress (monthly, quarterly, or whatever time period makes sense for your context), so that you and your team will know throughout the year whether you’re on track to meet the goal or whether you need to course-correct.

3. Consider what else will be going on in the same time period. A goal to increase your media coverage by 50% in a year might be perfectly realistic if you have the right plan attached to it – but it would probably be unrealistic if you also have multiple other stretch goals during that time that will be taking up most of your staff’s focus, plus a new media database being implemented that will slow your work during the transition. You can’t consider goals in a vacuum; consider them relative to other goals and any conditions that may impact people’s work.

4. Make sure your goal-setting is a discussion, not an announcement. As a manager, you could just announce to your team members what goals they’ll be responsible for meeting. But you’re far more likely to come up with the right goals – with the right targets and measures – and have buy-in from your staff (the people who, after all, will be the ones who need to carry them out) if they’re part of the conversation before goals are finalized. Your staff should have input and perspectives that shouldn’t be ignored as you’re setting goals, especially if you want those goals to be realistic. Plus, part of the value of a strong goal-setting process is that the discussion that goes into it can help bring different assumptions and perspectives to the surface; that discussion should ultimately result in better alignment about priorities, strategies, and expectations than you may have had earlier.

my boss wants to secretly recruit my coworkers and me into a money-making scheme

A reader writes:

I work for a very high-profile nonprofit as one of the “people on the ground” (aka, the people who get paid the least to do most of the work that is the nonprofit’s claim to fame). I’m fine with the low pay, especially because I love the work we do and believe in its importance, but it does mean that my coworkers and I are all really broke 20-somethings right out of college with limited professional experience.

Enter my manager: she comes across as a really fun, down-to-earth, positive person, so when she approached me (during a lunch break) and asked to have a private meeting after work to get to know each other, I said yes. After I agreed, she called to set up the date and time, then concluded the phone call with, “I like to keep my work and personal life separate, so this phone call never happened.” Which I thought was weird, but having already agreed, I went to the meeting.

Basically, I got there and she proceeded to try to convince me that she knew people who could change my life, that they were self-made millionaires at 30 and they wanted to help people earn money, but she wouldn’t say what they did or how they earned their money, just that you have to “build trust” to get close enough to them and she would be giving me reading material to see if I was worthy and then meet with me again. She kept saying, “This is very important, I don’t talk about this with just anyone, etc. etc. etc.” Afterwards I felt weird about it and asked a couple of my coworkers if she’d approached them. Sure enough, she’s met with at least two others, same spiel, same key phrases, also gave them the book, etc.

For me, this is an ethical issue. She’s our supervisor, and the group she’s approaching is particularly vulnerable to this BS (she kept talking about being debt-free, which is like swinging a carrot on a stick because most of us have lots of debt). How do I approach this? Is this illegal? If it’s not, is there a proper way to extricate myself without suffering repercussions down the line?

Ick.

A manager approaching employees about a shady moneymaking scheme (which is probably some kind of multi-level marketing or pyramid scheme, I’m guessing?) isn’t illegal, assuming that the scheme itself is not illegal, but it’s unethical as hell.

Unethical, unprofessional, and super shady.

There’s a reason that she told you that the phone call never happened, was careful to approach you on your lunch break, and met with you outside of work; she knows that she’s doing something sketchy, and she’s trying to create an artificial distinction between your work relationship and this other thing. Or, I suppose a more charitable interpretation is that she genuinely thinks that doing it that way is the right thing to do so that you don’t feel coerced by your boss to participate in this.

The problem is that it doesn’t work that way. She’s still your boss, even outside of work. And there are still power dynamics in play, and so therefore it’s still an inappropriate abuse of the relationship that your company would probably be very disturbed to hear about.

As for what to do: At a minimum, give her a clear no if she approaches you again. Say, “I gave it some thought and it’s not for me.” If she pushes you in any way after that, say, “I’m really not interested, thanks.”

If you have any worry that you’ll face even subtle professional repercussions from her for saying no, that’s when you need to get someone else involved, probably HR. This is the kind of thing that HR should come down hard on, so tell them what happened and then say, “It was such a hard sell that I’m worried that saying no may have repercussions for me as her employee.” Let them know, too, that you’re not the only one she approached.

expectations of student workers, transit service didn’t pick me up for work, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Am I being unreasonable in my expectations of this student worker?

I’m a newly hired assistant manager in an office setting. We recently hired a student worker who is paid hourly. On her second day, our student worker “saved” her unpaid lunch for the end of her shift (9-5) so that she could effectively end work early (she did not leave the office, but was unavailable for work). I’m not opposed to this occasionally, but doing so on her second day (without checking in or taking the time to understand the expectations of the department) makes me question her level of motivation and enthusiasm for the position.

I asked that our student worker not make a habit of it, since the end of the day is a good time to check in and debrief. We will also need her for phone coverage up until closing once our temp’s contract ends.

On my way back from the restroom, I heard her complaining to our temp about it – and our temp seemed surprised that I had asked her not to save her lunch in order to end work early. They both stopped talking immediately when I walked past them.

Our temp is friends with the student worker, and is the one who recommended her for the position. I am worried about a negative culture developing as a result of the dynamic between our temp and student worker.

Is it an unreasonable expectation for our student worker to not save her lunch for the end of her shift? And is there anything I can do preemptively to help set the tone and prevent a negative culture from developing?

No, it’s not unreasonable for you to expect her to use her lunch break as a mid-day break rather than a way to shorten her shift. But it would be unreasonable to question her enthusiasm over it — she’s a student worker, which means that she’s just starting to learn about workplace expectations, and part of your job is to teach them to her. So explain to her what your expectations are and why.

Complaining to a coworker on her second day is a lot more alarming to me. I’d keep a close eye on both of them and if you see anything more along those lines, I’d address it head-on. For example: “I haven’t been able to avoid overhearing you complaining to Jane about X and Y. I want to help you understand the rationale for both those things, but I also want to talk to you about the impression it can create in a workplace when you take such a negative outlook on pretty standard office policies.”

2. My boyfriend and I are applying at the same company

My long-term boyfriend and I are employed in a highly specialized niche field and are looking to change employers. Our top choice is located on the other side of the country from where we are now currently working. We work in a field where romantic partnerships are very common at all levels, even up to director levels. We are both fairly prominent professionally, and many people know who we are and that we are a couple, but not every single person in the business can be assumed to know.

We are stumped about when the appropriate time is to raise the issue that we are a couple. He thinks it should be in the cover letters; I think we should submit our cover letters at the same time and bring up the fact that we are a couple in our initial interviews. I can see his argument — put it out on the table right away in the interest of full disclosure and not springing it on them later, in case that fact would make them not consider us at all — but I also think it is something that is easier to bring up in person than on paper. What do you think?

Wait until you have an offer to mention it. It would be super weird to mention in the cover letter, and I don’t even think you need to raise it at an interview. Wait until one of you has an offer, and then — if the other one is still in the running — disclose it. I’d frame it as “I know you’re also talking with Gavin Plufferton, who is my partner; I wanted to make you aware of that in case it would pose any issues if you ended up extending an offer to him as well.”

Also, don’t send your applications at the same time; if they do already know you’re a couple, that looks too strangely coordinated.

3. Disabled transit service didn’t pick me up for work

I have mild spastic cerebral palsy, and work for a call center through a disability agency that I was referred to by a local government agency. Today wasn’t the first time this has happened, but it’s the first time I chose not to go to work because the transit for disabled people didn’t schedule me a ride TO work, but they had one for me coming back home from work, which made no sense to me at all. They know my schedule, but didn’t accommodate me, and now I’m scared I’ll lose my job because of their unreliable service. They’re the only transit in my area, and it was a tough decision to not go to work because I don’t get paid to take cabs when I’m supposed to have that reliable transit for disabled people. If I had taken a cab, I would have risked my safety … at least I can trust the people who drive for the disabled service. What should I do in this situation?

I’d contact someone with some authority at the agency that runs the transit program for disabled people and explain what’s been happening and that they’re putting your job at risk. Ask what can be done to ensure that you’re able to actually rely on the service they’re supposed to be providing to you. If they don’t sound like they’re taking it seriously and/or it continues to happen, I’d reach out your local government officials and ask for their help in resolving this; they’re often eager to take on things like this and get them fixed.

Meanwhile, let your manager know what’s going on and that you’re actively working to get it addressed.

4. Should I mention to a candidate that we’re neighbors?

I am recruiting for some on-call warehouse staff, and one of my neighbours who I say “hello” to but don’t hang out with applied. Is it okay that when I call her, I reveal that I am her neighbor? I thought the connection could establish more rapport. As a recruiter, would it be odd to reveal I’m her neighbor? I wouldn’t be interviewing her in person, just phone screening.

I’m probably projecting my own weirdness on to this, but it could potentially make her feel more nervous, if she feels like now she has to worry about not messing up in front of her neighbor, who she might forever feel awkward around if she gives a terrible interview. On the other hand, yes, it’s perfectly possible that it will help establish rapport. (Although if it’s a pretty quick phone screen, that may not matter that much.)

Do you only know that it’s her because you recognize the address (not the name)? If so, I’d be tempted to just let it go and pretend you never spotted it. But again, this could be my personal weirdness.

5. Is this overtime maneuver legal?

I work in West Virginia. My employer pays every two weeks. I worked 34 hours the first week and 51 hours the second. My employer took six hours and put them on the first week so it made 40 hours, and so I only got paid for 5 hours of overtime instead of 11. Is that legal?

It depends on what work week your employer uses. If they use a standard Monday through Friday week, than no, that’s not legal. They owe you overtime pay for the full 11 hours of overtime you worked the second week.

However, employers are allowed to set their work week as any fixed and regularly occurring seven consecutive days — so, for example, they could set it as starting on Thursday and running through the following Wednesday. And if they do that, that could explain what you’re seeing.

my new coworker keeps joking about violence

A reader writes:

I have started working with a new employee who has been working at our company for about a week. He’s really great at his job, and I would love working with him except that he is always making these little “jokes.” Essentially, he looks at me with a deadpan face and says things like, “I’m going to mess you up so bad that even your parents won’t be able to identify your body” and even more graphic, and then does a weird little laugh.

It’s never in response to anything, as far as I can tell, and I have also seen him say similar things to our other coworkers so I am decently confident that he isn’t serious, and I do see it as a joke. But clearly, it needs to stop.

I went to talk to my manager about this problem, and he seemed to already know about this issue but in a weird “Oh, yeah, that’s classic Jerry!” kind of way rather than in an “another staff member has brought this to our attention and we’re dealing with it” tone. (It might be worth it to note that I have suspicions that he may be friends with the new guy outside of work.) Secondly, he said it’s not his responsibility to deal with it, and it’s not up to him to “babysit” the staff, essentially chastising me for not handling it myself.

I have seen in a number of articles here that you advocate for handling issues one-on-one with coworkers if it’s a personal issue rather than going straight to a manager, but I feel in this instance the situation is a bit different.

First, I don’t at all feel comfortable with getting into any sort of confrontation with someone who thinks it’s funny to graphically describe how they’re going to kill you, even as a joke, because people like that are just generally unstable in other ways. I have also been seriously harassed and stalked by someone from work before, so these sorts of things make me extra uncomfortable.

Second, if I talk to him about making these jokes to me, he may stop but continue to make them with other employees.

Third, our company is very front-facing, and there are constantly customers just a handful of feet away from where these jokes take place, so that should make it the managers business to know.

Am I off-base here? Is this not as serious as I feel like it is, or it really is just my problem? I haven’t heard anyone else complaining about his jokes (and its a gossipy office so I feel like I normally would) so maybe I’m the only one creeped out by them. And if you think that this shouldn’t fall to me to deal with on my own, what should I do now?

No, you’re not off-base. Lots of people would find this just as unsettling as you do, and any halfway competent manager would be concerned about employees and customers being around comments like this rather than laughing it off.

Ideally the next time this guy makes one of these remarks, you’d tell him directly to stop — as in, “Please don’t say things like that to me or other people here. That’s really unsettling.” If he tells you he’s just joking, you can say, “Good, then it won’t be a big deal to stop” or “Joking or not, I don’t want to hear things like that” or whatever you’re comfortable with.

But if you’re not comfortable addressing it directly with him at all, I do think it’s reasonable to escalate this above him. You’re right that in general it’s better to try to handle interpersonal issues directly with coworkers, but this isn’t really just an interpersonal issue; it’s something a reasonable company would want to know about and put a stop to. (It’s different in that sense from, say, a coworker who annoys you by whistling all the time; that’s the sort of thing you should handle on your own. Someone making graphic threats of violence to coworkers is a bigger deal.)

Unfortunately, when you approached your manager about this, he got it 100% wrong. You told him you felt unsafe, and he brushed you off — and even told you that intervening would be him “babysitting” the staff. He’s wrong. It’s not reasonable to expect employees to work in an environment where a coworker regularly jokes about graphic violence. And that’s true even though you’re fairly sure that your coworker joking and doesn’t actually intend to dismember you; you still get to assert your desire not to be subjected to that.

It’s also particularly disturbing that your manager is so unconcerned that a new employee who’s only been there a week is already setting off alarm bells for people. He has a chance to nip this in the bud, and for some reason he’s not taking it. (If you’re right that they’re friends outside of work, that could explain it, but in that case it’s additional evidence of your manager’s poor judgment because that shouldn’t be influencing how he handles this.)

And really, this would be so, so easy for your manager to handle. “Hey, please stop joking about violence with people here; I know you’re joking, but it’s not appropriate here” is straightforward and would probably solve the problem.

Anyway, as for what to do now, do you have an HR department? They’d be the appropriate next step if you don’t want to say something directly to the dude yourself (or if you do and it continues), and they’re more likely to take this seriously than your boss did. You should also let them know that you tried to talk to your boss and what his response was, because they probably need to set him straight there.

Read an update to this letter here.

incompetent people probably have no clue that they’re incompetent

A fascinating Cornell University study a few years back found that people who are incompetent tend to dramatically overestimate their own competence, and people who truly are quite competent tend to underestimate their own performance.

At Inc. today, I talk about the implications of this for managers — such as that you must be explicit with employees who aren’t meeting your expectations rather than assuming that they know it, and that you also need to make sure your best employees know how much you value them. You can read it here.

should I pay a company to create a false work history for my resume?

We’ve had several posts about lying on resumes lately, and here’s one from the candidate side. A reader writes:

I have been unemployed for nine months now. I am scared that I’ll easily hit the one-year mark, and the financial stress is adding to the psychological pressure, emotional toll, and mental fixation. It is a crappy situation to be in.

I heard there is this company that “closes” your employment gap for a small fee. Basically, you’d be working for a fictitious company in a fictitious location with a fictitious title. I have contacted them and they are legit. Based on my judgment, they are nice and caring and discreet and reliable and professional. Their mission is to help put people back into work. They indicated that during the past few years and since they’ve been in business, they have never been caught even once. In fact, if the employment end date is put down as N/A (“present”) on the resume, the odds are quite slim that they’ll even be called.

There are naturally pros and cons to using this service, but it may be worth the risk. I need your advice. What would you do if you were me?

Don’t do that.

Do you want to be the person who falsifies important documents about yourself?

You do not.

And aside from the obvious integrity issues, do you want to spend months or years with the fear hanging over you that it might come out somehow (which would almost certainly result in you losing your job, even if you were good at it, and do pretty serious long-term harm to your reputation)? Do you want to spend years being scared every time your manager or an HR person asks you to meet with them without telling you why?

And there are so, so many ways this could come out. You’re right that most employers won’t insist on getting a reference from your current employer — but what if one of your other references (from your real past jobs) inadvertently outs you by saying something like, “I know he’s been looking for a while now”? Or what if the reference-checker asks one of your real references about your current work and it comes out that way?

That service says they’ve never been caught; I’m skeptical of that claim. And unfortunately, we can’t just take them at their word, because they’re in the business of lying. They are literally professional liars. (And I’m going to disagree with you that they are “nice and caring.” Nice and caring people do not lure you into doing something with such a high risk to yourself and make it seem like it’s no big deal, and they don’t actively work to defraud the people who may be your future coworkers.)

Look, long job searches suck. I know that. But you do not want it to turn you into someone who lies and cheats your way into a job (which, keep in mind, you would be getting at the expense of other candidates who applied honestly), and you don’t want a decision like this to haunt you for years after you find employment again.

team member caused drunken scene at coworker’s wedding, asking for Friday off the first week on the job, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Team member caused a drunken scene at coworker’s wedding

I am a team leader in a very small company. The team I manage only has two other members.

A few weeks ago, one of them, Jamie, got married. A few other colleagues and I were invited to the evening reception. The other member of the team got overly drunk and was abusive to many guests, knocked small children over on the dance floor, and was heard at the bar saying he was going to “F#%k s$¥t up.” When everyone was trying to leave, he started to get naked and violently abusive in the venue’s car park. This led to a massive fight as Jamie asked him to leave and he hit Jamie twice, knocking him to the floor. Guests were trying to eject him, but he was throwing punches and fighting them. He also spat blood all over the bride. His girlfriend punched the bride too. Jamie did not want to spend the night with police giving statements so did not press charges.

Jamie and I have stated to our employer that we do not want to work with this person. Our employer has said that the incident was outside of work so they are powerless. Jamie has been given a week to “forgive and forget” before the other member is sent back to the team.

Your employer isn’t powerless; they can absolutely take action over this if they want to, just like they could take action over, say, a sexual harassment incident that happened outside of work. They might be choosing not to get involved because they don’t know for sure what happened and they’d have to do an investigation, who knows. But yes, this sucks, and asking Jamie to “forgive and forget” the guy who punched him at his wedding, spat blood all over the bride, and generally caused a massive clusterfudge at his wedding is … a tall order.

But if you’re truly stuck with the situation and can’t change their mind, I’d sit down with this guy and tell him that he’ll need to figure out how to repair relations with Jamie, and that when he returns after his week away, you’ll expect to hear his thoughts on how he can do that. Put it on him to figure it out. (And if he doesn’t figure out on his own that any proposal is going to have to involve massive apologies and groveling, and possibly a plan for his alcohol use, point him in that direction.)

2. Asking to take off the Friday of my first week on the job

I have just been hired and accepted my offer letter for a new job. I have my start date set for about a week away. I was wondering if it would be alright to ask the hiring manager if I could take the Friday of my first week off for a family vacation we are doing that weekend. The company is very laid back and casual, but I want to make sure that I would not be offending anyone. I also do not want the company to think I do not take the job seriously.

No, don’t do that. It would be one thing if you had negotiated that day off as part of the offer negotiations, but now that you’ve accepted, asking for a day off on your first week won’t reflect well on you. Your new employer doesn’t know you well yet, and taking a day off that quickly is going to make them wonder if this is the start of a pattern of unreliable attendance. It doesn’t matter if they’re laid back and casual; you do not want to raise worries about your work ethic and commitment to the new job when they have so little data about you.

3. Some of my references haven’t responded

I am currently being considered for a new position in the health care industry. I had my interview and shortly after I was asked to provide five professional references. I had already secured my references before I initiated my job search. I was told by all five that they would gladly give me a reference. Before submitting their names and contact info, I sent all of my references a brief message alerting them that someone from the company that I applied to will be getting in contact with them. They all responded favorably, and three of them gave me a great reference. I am now waiting on two of my references to respond. I really want this job but I am concerned that if they don’t respond in time, I will be passed up for another candidate. I don’t know if I should send them a quick reminder via email, but I don’t want to come off as a nuisance. Or should I provide two more references who I know will respond? What do I do?

How long has it been? If it’s just been a day or two, give them a little more time. But if it’s been multiple business days with no response, yes, you should follow up with them. Say something like this: “Jane, I wanted to check with you about the reference Teapots Inc. reached out about. They told me they haven’t heard from you and they can’t move forward until they do, so I was hoping that you might be able to get back to them today!” Sometimes people just forget, or don’t realize it’s time-sensitive. A polite reminder is perfectly appropriate.

And meanwhile, tell the employer that you’re following up with the references, so that they know you’re on it.

4. Team leads vs. managers

I’ve noticed in a few of your articles that you note a difference between team lead and manager. At my company, all management are called “team lead” (even the CEO). Team leads are responsible for rankings, which determine your raises and bonuses, but don’t know how much you make (or even the percentage change); if you have a problem with your compensation, you’re referred to HR. Team leads are responsible for working people out if it’s a bad fit but aren’t given the information gleaned from HR’s exit interviews. We only hire for entry-level positions and becoming a team lead isn’t considered a promotion (and doesn’t include a raise). This is my first time with a company this size (~10,000) so I’m at a loss to know if this is normal. What do you think?

Nope, not normal. Your company is using the terminology differently than it’s usually used.

Typically a team lead is someone who keeps team members focused and on track for various projects. They might divvy up and monitor work, and they often give feedback and guidance to team members but generally don’t have real managerial authority. When issues arise, they typically can intervene only in fairly limited ways and usually need to escalate anything serious to the team’s manager.

A manager, on the other hand, has broader decision-making responsibilities and and usually has hiring and firing authority, which a team lead does not.

5. Following up about a second position after an interview for a different one

Can I follow up on other positions at a company after I’ve had an interview about one of the positions and am still waiting to hear back? I feel like I was invited to do so, but the interviewer didn’t take the initiative with it.

Earlier, when we were setting up the phone interview for the position I’m still waiting to hear about, she included this in the email: “Are you going to [professional conference] this year? If so, would you like to get together with me and one or two of my colleagues from [our institution] for coffee and a conversation? This wouldn’t be a formal interview, but rather just a chance to meet in person and talk a bit. We could tell you about the program we’re building at [our institution] and a number of positions that will be open in the near future.”

I was not attending the conference, so I said I looked forward to discussing it in the interview. I didn’t end up asking about it in the interview because there were more people than just her on the call. Can I follow up now with an email like this: “It was great talking with you earlier today about the [position]. While I’m very excited about this opportunity, I wanted to follow up with you on your mention of other positions that will open in the future. I see that you have also listed [different position]. Would you find it strange if I also applied for this? I think working for a new department and helping to set up the guides and workflows would be a really interesting opportunity and I would like to participate in some way.”

Basically, yes, but I’d reword it to something more like this: “It was great talking with you earlier today about the [position]. I’m really interested in the role and look forward to learn more. In addition, I recalled that when we connected a few weeks ago, you mentioned you expected to have other positions opening soon, and I noticed you’ve posted an X opening. I’d love to throw my hat in the ring for both if you think it would make sense to do so; I’d be excited to pursue either of them.”

So less “would you find it strange?” (that’s a little too strong) and less “I would like to participate in some way” (that way is by being hired for the job, presumably), and more straightforward.

do not cheat the one-page resume rule by using a tiny font and tiny margins

If you’re early in your career, you’ve probably heard that your resume should only be one page. And perhaps you’ve tried to wiggle your way around that rule by using a tiny font and non-existent margins so that you can cram more text into one page.

If you’re done this, you’re violating the rule in spirit and probably making your resume less effective.

(Before I go any further, let me clearly note that if you’re at least midway into your career, the one-page resume rule doesn’t apply to you. You get a second page at that point. But if you’re only a few years out of school, you do indeed need to stick to one page.)

Anyway, if you’re trying to keep your resume to one page, you can’t do it by shrinking your font to the point that only people with a monocle can read it or by adjusting your margins so that there’s hardly any white space on the top, bottom, and sides of the page. If you do things like that in an attempt to cheat your way into more space, (a) it will be totally obvious what you are doing, and (b) you’ll be doing it at the expense of how easy it is for a hiring manager to read.

And you really, really want it to be easy for a hiring manager to read. Small, crowded text with no white space is hard to read and even harder to scan, which means that hiring managers’ eyes are likely to glaze over when they turn to your resume, which is the exact opposite of what you want. (And some hiring managers won’t bother to endure the eye strain and will just go on to the next resume in their stack.)

Plus, the one-page resume rule for early-career people is there for a reason. It’s telling you what the appropriate amount of information for your resume is when you’re only a few years out of school: the amount that fits on a single page with normal margins. When you try to circumvent that with margin and font shenanigans, you end up looking like someone who can’t or won’t edit.

There are exceptions to every rule, of course — but far more people think they’re the exception to this than who actually are. If your experience is limited, you’re better off being brutal about sticking to one page — with reasonable margins and a legible font size.

What that means in practical terms: Your margins should be at least one inch on all four sides. You can probably get away with going down to half an inch on the top and bottom if you absolutely must, but no smaller. Font size depends on the font, but in most cases anything smaller than 11 point risks being tough for some people to read, especially if they’re older. And line spaces are not your enemy.

And yes, that might mean you have to pare things down. Consider what you really want the hiring manager to know and focus there.