how managers should communicate decisions they don’t agree with

A reader writes:

I’m a unit head at a government agency that is having some serious financial and managerial turmoil. The powers that be are contemplating a decision that could have a very negative impact on my area, and our manager called all his units to discuss the issue. He explained the case he would make, but also said repeatedly, “I’ll do my best, but you know that the boss will end up doing whatever the boss wants, and there’s nothing I can really do to stop it.” Which is historically true, but was also incredibly demoralizing to hear.

This got me thinking about what to tell my unit about this situation, or similar ones in the future. There’s got to be a better way to say that you’ll fight for them, right? And if you lose the fight, how do you communicate that to your team without making them bitter about upper administration?

Ugh, yeah, your manager mishandled this.

When you’re a manager, you’re part of your company’s management team, and part of that job is to represent that team to your staff, even when you don’t agree with its decisions.

That doesn’t mean that you have to become a Stepford Wife who smiles blankly and spouts a bland, rehearsed party line. But it does mean that you need to talk about management decisions with respect, and to the extent that you can, help your team understand the reasoning for them. Presenting the people above you as volatile, mystifying, or inept undermines them and will destroy your own bosses’ trust in you if they find out that you’re doing it. It’ll also create resentment and some serious cynicism on your team, and that will impact your own effectiveness in the long run.

In this case, it would have been better for your boss to have said something like, “I’m going to stress our concerns about X and Y and will especially emphasize Z, but there are other factors that the agency will have to consider as well, and it’s possible that those could end up trumping our concerns. If that happens, I’ll be thinking about A, B, and C to try to mitigate the impact on us. I expect to hear something definitive by the end of next month, and I’ll keep you posted.”

And then, if the ultimate decision does go against your team, your manager would ideally explain the other factors that ended up being considered more important. And he can acknowledge that that sucks for your team at the same time that he acknowledges that the organization had to factor in considerations beyond that.

One caveat to all this: There are cases where it’s so widely understood that a higher-up is out of her gourd or that a policy has no redeeming value that you’ll lose credibility if you don’t acknowledge that. Even then, though, the way you talk about it matters: Calm and matter-of-fact, yes. Openly disgusted, no.

Read an update to this letter here.

how to manage the subject matter experts on your team

It’s great to have subject matter experts on your team. In addition to your own team benefiting from their expertise, they may end up highly sought by other teams too, which can raise your team’s value throughout the organization. But when subject expertise isn’t the person’s main job responsibility, how can you get the most value from them without overextending them or shortchanging their other work?

1. Make providing expertise an explicit part of their job. Otherwise, people tend to get stuck providing expertise on top of an already full-time slate of other duties. But if you make it a clear part of their role, it can be easier to carve out protected time for that work/ For example, if you acknowledge that 15% of the person’s time will be spent providing feedback to the technical writing team even though they’re a product engineer, it’s going to help reinforce that they’ve only got 85% of their time remaining for their “core” work – and prevent a situation where they get stuck with full-time work plus another 15%.

2. Be clear about the trade-offs. Jane may provide huge value to the company by spending that 15% of her time helping another team, but if it leaves your team short-handed on its own important work, you need to confront that tension head-on. Does the other team actually need to hire their own staff member to handle what Jane is helping them with? Do you need to add staff to your own time? Is it okay that your team will get slightly less done because Jane is providing that help? There are a variety of possible answers here; the key is for you to get really clear on what trade-offs are reasonable to make and whether there are better alternatives.

3. Be really clear with the staff member about priorities. It might be just fine for Jane to lend her expertise to other teams much of the team, but you’ll want to make sure she’s aligned with you about what the limits of that are. Are there projects that always need to come first? Are there pieces of your project cycles where you need her to be unavailable to other teams so that she can focus on her work for you? It’s crucial to make sure that you and the person are very much on the same page, so that the time she’s allocating to providing expertise versus other work doesn’t conflict with what your team needs.

Relatedly, make sure that the person doesn’t feel overextended or pulled in too many different directions. One way to do that is to explicitly authorize the person to push back when subject expertise requests are threatening their other work or their ability to work a reasonable schedule. If the person knows you want them to raise it when that’s happening, you’re more likely to hear about it early, rather than only once the problem is entrenched and the person is approaching burn-out.

my boss asked me, “if you were fired, who would you tell first?”

A reader writes:

I am a junior employee at a fast-paced agency. I have worked here for 8 months with minimal training and zero performance reviews. I feel like I’m flying by the seat of my pants, but my peers have told me that they think I’m doing well. My boss took me out to steak dinner on my birthday, let me train with her at the gym, and even takes me to get my nails done. And yet, their lack of investment in my professional development makes me afraid I’m headed towards the pink slip.

Last week, I was sitting next to my boss when a message popped up on her screen from her peer. It revealed they think I’m a “risk” to the important project I’ve been assigned, because I will “jump when the client says jump.” My boss was stumbling over her words when she realized I had seen the message, and arranged a meeting for the three of us to discuss the issue later that day. No one explicitly mentioned the private message I’d seen. I asked for clarification on the mistakes I’ve made, owned my previous mistakes, and asked how I should avoid these mistakes moving forward.

Right after the meeting, I was stunned and shaken. I had no idea they thought I was a risk. I wondered, what else are they not telling me? After a few moments, my boss breaks the silence and says “if you were fired, who would you tell first?” I answered, trying my best to hide my fear, and asked why. She had some longwinded personal story about how someone had been given several signs they were going to be fired, but missed the cues. I was horrified. I wasn’t sure if it was just a badly-timed story or a passive-aggressive hint.

How do I shake my fear of being fired?

What the hell? “”If you were fired, who would you tell first?” should probably go on the list of questions that a manager should never ask her team, right next to “can I borrow 100 bucks from you?” and “will you sleep with me?” There’s no way for a manager to ask that question and not have it worry people; warranted or not, it raises the specter of being fired, and it’s unkind.

And then add to that that it was on the heels of a meeting about performance concerns (!), and it gets even worse.

I suppose it’s possible that it was just a terribly timed coincidence, but it’s entirely reasonable that you’re feeling shaken up and wondering if there’s some hint here that you’re supposed to be picking up on.

I would address it head-on with your boss. If you’ve misinterpreted, she’ll welcome the chance to set things straight … and if there’s cause for concern, it’ll be useful to bring that to the surface. I’d say something like this: “I have to admit, it made me deeply worried about my job when you asked me who I’d tell first if I were fired, coming on the heels of a meeting about mistakes I’ve made. You also mentioned someone who missed the signs that they were going to be fired. Can I ask you candidly — do you have concerns that I might not be the right fit for the job?”

If she insists that there’s no cause for concern, you might also say: “I just want you to know, if at any point I’m in danger of being fired, I’d be so grateful to be told clearly that my job was in jeopardy and told what specific improvements I needed to make. I was thinking about the person in your story who didn’t pick up on the signals before getting fired, and I hope you’ll feel comfortable telling me directly if things are ever on that path.”

Also, either separately or as part of this conversation, ask how things are going in general. That’s not something that you should have to guess at; it’s totally okay to say, “Can we talk about how things are going in general? I think I have a good sense of where I should be focusing on improving, but I have a less strong sense of how you feel about things overall.”

my boss keeps crying at work, LinkedIn user hit on me, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss keeps crying at work

My boss regularly cries at work – I’ve seen her cry about 10 times this year. The most recent time was today when my colleague quit as she has a promising opportunity. I find it really off-putting and am angry at the emotional burden she has put on my colleague, who now feels guilty about her choice. Is this a ridiculous thing to go to a regional manager about? I pity her but I think it has happened too frequently.

Yeah, it would be disconcerting to see your manager regularly crying. And crying because someone is leaving is taking a normal part of business way too personally.

If it’s truly interfering with your work, I could see discreetly mentioning it to someone above her — if you have a decent relationship with that person and they’re known to handle work issues reasonably and skillfully. But otherwise, I’d instead wait for a clearer opportunity to raise it — such as if you’re asked to give feedback for her evaluation, or if an opportunity develops organically in conversation with her. That might never happen, of course — but if you have decent rapport with her, I could imagine relationships and contexts where it would be reasonable to say, “Hey, when you’re so visibly upset about a work issue, it really rattles the team. It’s tough to work around strong emotions like that, especially from the person we’re looking to to steer the ship.” I can also imagine relationships and contexts where there would be no way to say that, of course, and if that’s the case, this might be part of the annoying package that comes with your manager.

2. Rude comment from manager

I told my manager that I was fat, and she was like, “Yeah, because you eat the crap food.” I was stunned. Please help.

Well, it wasn’t the kindest response, but … it’s sort of disingenuous to make “I’m fat” statements and not be okay with the person you’re talking with taking it face value. And yes, it’s common knowledge that when people say they’re fat, they’re looking for some variation of “no, you’re not,” but it’s hard to blame people who don’t feel like playing that game.

3. Reaching out to network with rejected job candidates

I was on the hiring committee to add a peer to our team—someone with the same job title as me. We met with three qualified applicants and hired one. It was a relatively close race, but they had differences in experience and the hiring manager (my boss) ultimately chose based on skills and fit. My company does send a polite rejection letter when the search is over and a candidate is hired. Everything about our process has been timely and respectful.

I thought that the other two candidates were very talented and qualified and, being in a specialized industry, it was great to meet new professional peers. I felt like I identified with them on a personal and professional level, more than I do with my current peer colleagues. Would it be strange to reach out to them (separately) for a networking meeting? They are both new to the area and looking for work. The specific town that they live in (and I work in) is not known for having these types of positions in quantity or quality. I have knowledge about the local job market and the employers out there, and I am also starting a job search. I also have perspective on how their resume and interview was perceived by our hiring committee. (I would personally find it incredibly helpful to get feedback on how I present myself in job search situations.)

How do I do this with tact, or is it not a good idea to reach out to them?

I think you can absolutely do this as long as you’re clear about what the purpose of the meeting is. You don’t want them to inadvertently think that you’re considering them for a different role at your company, or that the meeting will help them be considered there in the future. Just be clear about your goal — for example, “We clearly have a shared professional interest in X and Y, and I know you’re new to the area and looking for work. I’d be glad to get coffee with you and share what I know about the local market” or whatever.

One caveat: You mentioned possibly giving them feedback about how their candidacy was perceived by the hiring committee. Before you do that, clear it with the committee. You shouldn’t speak for your company on that without your company’s okay.

4. My manager showed me a job ad and encouraged me to apply for it

My manager recently showed me a current vacancy in the papers and encouraged me to apply if I want to. But I’ve only been employed in this organization for four months and I’m still undergoing training — not to mention, the economics department is short on staff and I’m the only economist. Is this a good or bad sign?

I don’t know! It could be that your manager is one of those people who’s always on the lookout for development opportunities for other people — although she should have thought about how an employee would take that kind of thing, especially a new employee. Or she could know something that you don’t — that your job is unstable in some way. But instead of speculating and worrying, why not just ask her? I’d say this: “I’ve been wondering about why you showed me that job opening the other day. I’m really happy in my current role and hope to stay here for a long time, but our conversation made me wonder if you have concerns about whether it’s the right fit.”

5. LinkedIn user hit on me

I accepted a LinkedIn invitation without researching the sender. He wrote that he saw my picture and is single — pretty much what you’d write on a singles site. Should I block him, reply to him that I’m married, ignore him? If this has happened to any of your readers, I’ll love to hear how they handled it.

Ick. Block him and don’t give it another thought. (And that reminds me of this.)

update: my coworker keeps missing deadlines and it impacts my work

Remember the letter-writer whose work was being impacted by a coworker who chronically missed deadlines? Here the update.

While I was mulling over the moral/karma implications of calling out my colleague (Cecil) for his lack of accountability, I also started work on Plan B. There is another project I’m working on that happens to use similar data for a different purpose, and I’m working with a different analyst (George). George and Cecil work in the same department. It was an easy no-brainer to modify the business specs of the report George is building so that it could replace the work that Cecil does (and – bonus – will be automated!).

I mentioned this to my boss on Friday, as in “By the way, the next time Big Project rolls around, I won’t need Cecil to help me anymore because I can just use the report I’m building with George.” Then I added, “…and just so you know, it’s been really, really hard to work with Cecil, so having this new automated report from George is a real coup for all stakeholders…” And before I began to describe why it’s hard to work with him, my boss interrupted me to say “Oh, I know. I have had to work with Cecil in the past and it is a nightmare. I have spoken to Cecil’s boss (Fergus) boss about him numerous times. He is well aware of the problem, but is reluctant to dismiss him because [blah, blah bureaucracy, hiring freezes, HR, etc.] but this is an ongoing issue that Fergus will eventually have to resolve.”

I was so deeply relieved by my boss’s understanding, and that the problem was already well-known (and not just impacting me). I do feel like I dodged a bullet here – both because I found a workaround and because I wasn’t throwing my colleague under the bus – he was already living under that bus.

I realize that I may not be so lucky in the future, and that the time may come where I need to raise a flag about a colleague to upper management. When that time comes, I will be circling back to the advice of your readers: (1) Ramp up project management tactics, document everything, request acknowledgement of deadlines, check in multiple times; (2) when deadlines slip, consult colleague to determine whether the project has been de-prioritized, and if so, work with senior management to free up time for colleague to complete tasks, (3) if it’s truly a case that coworker isn’t holding his/her end of the bargain, let colleague know that I am planning to let my boss know. And then let my boss know. Even if it’s uncomfortable to do so.

8 things that will make you look like a weirdo to hiring managers

Getting a job isn’t just about having strong qualifications. It’s also about being someone who hiring managers want to hire and work with every day. That means that they’re paying attention to how you operate and whether you understand business norms at every stage of the hiring process, from the very first contact. And there are some things that some job candidates do that function as flashing neon signs of weirdness to employers. Here are seven of them.

1. Sending flowers, candy, or other gifts to the hiring manager. Some candidates still think this is a good way to stand out, but there’s probably no faster way to make a hiring manager uncomfortable. If you’re not qualified for the job, sending a gift isn’t going to change that. And if you arequalified for the job, you’ve now made the interviewer uncomfortable by implying that you think your qualifications aren’t enough on their own, but that she might be swayed by some chocolate. It’s tacky and ineffective.

2. Showing up without an appointment and asking to meet with the hiring manager. There’s a very small number of fields where this can be normal, but in the vast, vast majority of professional fields, it’s just not done. Most hiring managers are busy. They set aside specific blocks of time for interviews – the ones who they’ve decided they want to speak with. If you show up without an invitation, you look like you’re either trying to circumvent that process or don’t understand business norms.

3. Including a line in your cover letter warning employers not to contact you unless they can meet specific conditions. Some candidates think that they’ll save themselves time or show employers that they’re serious if they include a sentence in their cover letter like, “Please do not contact me unless you are serious about hiring a driven, results-oriented sales director.” Or “Please do not contact me unless you can pay a competitive salary and benefits.” Those are reasonable things to want – but statements like those don’t just ward off employers you won’t like; they’ll ward off everyone else too. It’s just too negative and accusatory.

4. Applying for jobs from an email account that you share with your spouse. If you want to share an email account with your spouse in your personal life, that’s your call. But for your professional life, you need your own. Employers don’t want to feel like they’re corresponding with two people when they write back to you; they want to speak only with you. And email accounts are free, after all.

5 .Offering to work for free. Sometimes job candidates will offer to work for a week or a month for free, in order to prove themselves. This is a bad idea for two reasons: First, it’s illegal. Minimum wage laws require employers to pay people who do work for them (with some exceptions to this, like nonprofits). Second, bringing on new employees takes an enormous amount of time and energy for training, among other things, and the first weeks are usually a loss for the employer, because they’re investing time in getting you up to speed. Most don’t want to make that kind of investment in anyone other than the best candidate (who they expect to pay).

6. Reading your answers word for word from notes during an interview. Notes are good, and it’s great to bring notes to a job interview. But they’re just there to jog your memory, not to give you a script to read. Reading prepared answers makes it look like you can’t think on your feet – and for all we know, someone else may have written those answers for you. Interviews need to be a real conversation, not a rigidly rehearsed performance.

7. Including a photo with your resume. While there are some countries outside the U.S. where it’s normal and even expected to send a photo when applying for a job, it’s very much not the business convention here, and you’ll look out of touch with business norms if you include one. After all, unless you’re applying for a job as a model or an actor, your photo has no relevance to your ability to do the job.

8. Saying you’ll do “anything it takes” to get the job.Good employers don’t want you to do that. They don’t want you to want to do that. Remember: An employer isn’t doing you a favor by interviewing or hiring you. You’re having a conversation to try to figure out whether you’d each like to embark upon a business relationship, one that you’d both benefit from. Plus, employers (and other people) respect people who respect themselves. Signal that you’re worthy of their respect.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

should I call out this company that jerked me around during a long-distance interview?

A reader writes:

I would love your input on a job interview process I have recently experienced.

A little backstory – my wife and I are expecting child #2 in the next few months. We have decided to try to move closer to my family (about three hours away) so they can assist with child care while we work, which will greatly alleviate the expense of paying for child care.

I applied for a job in the city where my parents live that I would be perfect for . I had a phone interview and was subsequently invited to come in for a face to face interview. The next day, I was contacted and asked to come back in for a second interview with the hiring manager’s bosses.

I made it clear in the first interview that I lived three hours away, was excited at the prospect of working for their company and being closer to family, but had to take time off at my current job to travel to their location for the interview (not to mention the expense of gas for a six-hour round trip). When I was contacted for the second face to face interview, I wrote back and asked if they would consider an interview via Skype or FaceTime and explained that I had a limited amount of vacation time I could take (I only get 10 days off per year) and was trying to save it for when my wife delivers our child. This was, after all, a marketing/technology position I had applied for, and I didn’t think using such technology would pose a problem. They replied back and said that they could not accommodate that request and I would need to come back in to meet with the big bosses in person, so I agreed and took another day off of work (the second full day) to meet with them since I very much wanted to work there.

The second face to face interview went great and I could tell they liked me, but I got the “do you have any questions for us?” question literally 15 minutes into the interview (which in my experience is the question that wraps up the interview). I asked four or five questions and the interview was over in less than 25 minutes – and looking back it could have easily been done by Skype or FaceTime.

I emailed both bosses and thanked them for taking time, and one emailed back and said they’d definitely be in touch this week. Well, I just got an email from the HR department saying that they’ve put the hiring for this position on hold because of ambiguity in the job description and the functions of the responsibility of the job. So basically, they were conducting interviews for a job for which they weren’t even sure about what the job functions were.

I could have handled not being the best candidate much more easily than them telling me they weren’t sure what the exact job description was. There was a detailed job description in the job posting, so I’m not even sure the explanation they gave me is truthful. But instead, they posted the job anyway and caused me to come in and use two days of vacation when I need every hour of it to be with my wife when our child is born. Who conducts interviews for a job when you aren’t even sure what the person will be doing?

What would you think if I wrote back and very tactfully pointed out how much trouble I went to, only to find out that the company didn’t have all their ducks in a row and essentially wasted 20% of my vacation time for the year? I know that isn’t usually done, but I am a good writer (I write part-time for our local paper) and could word it very straightforwardly and matter-of-factly. I just feel applicants get the raw end of the deal sometimes and sometimes, when the offense of a company is this egregious, they need to be called out on it. After this, I’m not interested in working for them anyway, so it doesn’t matter if I burn the proverbial bridge in this case.

Don’t write back to complain.

You’re taking this more personally than you should — doubting the explanation they gave you, assuming they were conducting interviews before they should have, and feeling that they recklessly wasted your time. But unless they intentionally brought you in to interview knowing that they had no intention of hiring you, we don’t actually know that they were cavalier with your time.

It is possible that they jerked you around and had you come in twice when they should have known better. But it’s also possible that they didn’t.

Your frustration seems to rest on this statement: “Basically, they were conducting interviews for a job for which they weren’t even sure about what the job functions were.” But we don’t really know that. They could have done everything right, but something changed that they couldn’t have predicted: There might have been internal changes since interviewing you that called parts of the job description into question. There might have been questions about the structure of the role that arose late in the game based on late-emerging factors you don’t know anything about (staffing changes, client issues, budget questions, etc.). “Ambiguity in the job description” could mean “We figured Responsibility X would be handled between Bob and the new person, but Bob just gave notice, so we need to revisit our plan.” Who knows — but there are lots of things that could reasonably cause them to pause and reconsider before moving forward with hiring … which is a lot better than hiring someone and then changing their minds about what the role should look like.

Or yes, it’s possible that they were total flakes who should have known better. We just don’t know, and you don’t want to base a complaint letter on a guess.

I do think that ideally they would have tried to accommodate you in some way when you pointed out that you’d need to take additional vacation days to come back in, and I can see why you’re annoyed that they wouldn’t use Skype or FaceTime for an interview that ended up being only 25 minutes. But it’s also not unreasonable that they don’t want to hire someone with a final decision-maker meeting finalists in person (and many people feel they get a better sense of candidates if they can talk face to face),  and just because the job you were interviewing for centered around technology, that doesn’t mean that the executives you’d be interviewing with are comfortable with that technology themselves. It’s also possible that the second interview was intended to be longer, but they realized pretty quickly that they didn’t think you were quite right for the role so they wrapped it up earlier. (I know that you said it went great, but they only talked to you for 15 minutes before moving to the candidate-question portion of the interview, which says it’s possible things didn’t go quite as great as you thought. In fact, even had you talked for hours, that would still have been possible — it’s hard to judge as a candidate how well an interview really went, no matter how friendly your interviewers are. And of course, you could be smart, talented, and personable, and still wrong for the job.)

And really, two interviews isn’t that outrageous. It’s not ideal when you’re three hours away, yes, but I’d say it’s closer to pain-in-the-ass than full-on outrage.

Speaking of things being a pain in the ass, the reality is that when you’re job-searching long-distance, there is often a pain-in-ass factor that comes along with it. When employers have plenty of qualified local candidates, they don’t have much incentive to consider long-distance candidates, and so if you want to be in the running from afar, you often have to do things that essentially erase the long-distance element for them.

In this case, I think you’re frustrated because you’re reading too much into what they told you about needing to revisit the job description (which is totally understandable; reading too much into rejections is a time-honored part of job hunting). But ultimately, this is just a job rejection — the same one that you could have received at the end of this process for any number of reasons. The best thing you can do is to treat it as that, accept that it’s always a risk when you inconvenience yourself for any interview, let go of the idea of trying to show them how wrong they were or even believing that this was especially egregious, and try to move on.

profane decal on a car used for work, coworkers keep making me buzz them back inside, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Employee has mildly profane decal in the car she uses for work

I recently hired a new employee who is great — very engaging with customers, asks lots of good questions, and her personality clicks with the other team members. The position she was hired for requires the use of a personal vehicle to show homes to clients (clients follow in their own vehicle, not get in hers).

Her vehicle, as I noticed today in the parking lot, has a very large window decal on the back window with a profane statement. It reads “BAD ASS GIRLS DRIVE BAD ASS TOYS.” Not really offensive, just not exactly professional, in my opinion.

I personally don’t feel like use of profanity, in any way, around customers is professional, but I also don’t want to lose a good employee over something as trivial as a window sticker. How should I handle this?

I think this depends on your line of work and what kind of vibe your clients expect from you. If you have reason to think your clients expect a pretty conservative approach from you and it’ll put them off, just be straightforward about that. For example: “Jane, a lot of our clients expect us to take a pretty conservative approach to this work, and I think may be put off by even the pretty mild profanity in your window decal. Could you remove it on days when you’re showing homes to clients?”

But other clients might appreciate the show of personality, so this really comes down to your sense of your client base.

2. Getting coworkers to use their key fobs instead of having me buzz them in

I work as an admin/receptionist at a small firm. All colleagues are provided with fobs to get back in to our office. I also have a buzzer to let guests in. All too frequently, my colleagues rely on me to buzz them in to the office, despite having fobs (and there are two additional fobs kept on hooks near the door for folks who want to use them during the day). This annoys me so much! But then I remind myself “it’s my job.” But is there a way to nicely but effectively remind them to use their own fobs (or the extra ones hanging up)? It would save me the effort to buzz them in (sometimes I’m in a different part of the office and I hear them knocking, and I have to rush back to my desk to let them in)? It also just seems a little rude that they do this more times than not.

I’d say this: “If you can, will you take your fob with you when you go out? My work sometimes takes me away from my desk and it can be tough to need to rush back to buzz you in if I’m in the middle of something somewhere else.” Or, “I’m glad to buzz you in if you occasionally forget, but the buzzer is really for guests, but staff is supposed to use their fobs.” (Assuming that’s the case, of course. And if it is, they really may not realize that, so it’s worth pointing out.

3. Keeping a new employee engaged during a slow period

I’m an internal researcher at a university, and when I started my position about 3 years ago things got off to a slow start. It took a while for projects I was involved in to get off the ground, to get to know people, and to get invited to meetings. I’d say it took a good 6-8 months to become integrated, and during that time I wondered often about why everyone else seemed so busy. Fast forward to present day and I am now the person who is rushing around busy all the time…my workload became so heavy that leadership decided to promote me to being a manager and hire a person to work under me. This has been quite a daunting transition for me, as I am not used to thinking about how to occupy someone else’s time (only my own!).

The person I hired is hard-working, super smart, and eager to prove herself. Unfortunately, she is now going through the “slow” period that I went through since her projects are just taking off, and she doesn’t yet have strong relationships with our internal stakeholders (many of whom are currently on vacation). I created a project task list for her that she completed much faster than I expected. In addition, August is always the slowest time of the year because all the students are away from campus. Many people end up taking time off in August as a result.

I am feeling nervous about not being able to sufficiently occupy her time in a productive way during these two weeks or in any future “slow” periods that may occur. My experience is telling me that I shouldn’t assign her additional projects because the workload will become unmanageable in just a month’s time. But I don’t want her to get bored. Should I encourage her to spend this (rare) downtime developing some professional development skills? Are there other approaches you would suggest or advice you would give to me about how to create a steady workflow?

If there are more short-term projects that genuinely need to be done, or if you can give her a list of longer-term projects that aren’t time-sensitive (so that she can work on them when she has downtime and put them aside without worry when things pick back up), do that. Also, to the extent possible, give her a bunch at once, rather than doling them out piecemeal; the latter can be frustrating, especially for fast workers.

But also, explain to her what you said here. Explain the ebb and flow of the work, and what she can expect right now and that it will change in a few weeks, so that she understands the full context. If she doesn’t have that context, she could start feeling bored and worried that the job won’t keep her engaged. But if she understands what you explained here, she’ll almost certainly be fine with it, especially if you give her the go-ahead to work on developing specific skills or do other stuff that interests her.

4. Employee keeps complaining about her problems to customers

I have an employee who tells customers every day about her problems. Whether it be work-related issues or at home fights with her boyfriend, she tells customers every day. Some customers are repeat as we have a catering food truck. I have been getting complaints from people who don’t want to hear her problems. How can I tell her to stop?

Be direct: “Jane, I’d like you to stop telling customers about work or personal problems you’re having. I want to keep things positive and upbeat for our customers. Can you do that?”

5. I’m nervous about my legacy going down the tubes because my soon-to-be-former boss is mishandling my transition

I recently gave notice at my job of six years. I start at a new, exciting job in a few weeks. My boss at my current job has been here less than a year. He’s supposed to be sitting with me and learning all my job duties before my last day. But he has barely spent 15 minutes a day with me on only 3 days. He does not know nearly everything, and I’m feeling nervous about my legacy after six years going down the tube. I care for and really respect my other coworkers, and I also worry that the slack will fall on them when boss can’t do my job. I did circumspectly let my coworkers know about the amount of time that boss was spending with me, just so they weren’t surprised when they were asked to do the work. I don’t want them to think I didn’t try.

But then yesterday I came back from lunch at the appointed time and my boss’ door was closed. I unintentionally overheard him on the phone. The walls are not very thick. And he was definitely taking a phone interview with another company and setting up a time for an in-person interview. What do I do? Should I warn my coworkers before I leave?

Also, HR is not really an option because boss and HR are on very friendly terms and spend a lot of time together. I would not be surprised to know that HR already knows about his plans but has not shared them with anyone.

Write this one off to just not your business. I totally get the sickening feeling that your legacy will go down the tubes because of someone else’s incompetence, but the reality is that there’s nothing you can do about that. You’ve done your part in trying to assist in a smooth transition; the rest is up to your boss, and you can’t force his hand there. Telling your coworkers about the call you overheard will only cause drama, and it’s just not your place to spread that around (plus, the interview may come to nothing, who knows).

All this is going to soon be not your problem. Do your best to leave things in good order, leave behind strong documentation, and go start your new job without staying mired in something that you can’t control and isn’t your responsibility.

weekend free-for-all – August 22-23, 2015

olive and eveThis comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly no work and no school. If you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Book Recommendation of the Week: Travels with Alice, by Calvin Trillin, whose amusing stories of traveling (and eating — so much eating) with his wife and daughters will make you want to be part of his family. If you like this kind of thing and you like curmudgeons, you may then want to then move on to The Tummy Trilogy, which contains three of his similar books.

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

I have nothing to do at work, should I explain why I’m declining an offer, and more

It’s four answers to four questions. Here we go…

1. Should I feel guilty for having nothing to do?

I’m a salaried, exempt employee making $30,000 per year at my first professional job. I get all of my work done in a timely fashion. Beyond the normal feedback that comes with being trained while new, there have been no complaints about what I produce. Sometimes we have a big crunch, and then I go hard all day, but on the other hand we have slow periods too. I literally run out of tasks unless I make them for myself, which I’m not really authorized to do (e.g. business development inquiries; I’m too junior).

The office is organized. I’ve suggested initiatives to my boss — upgrading the website, for example — and he’s been really slow to authorize me to work on those types of things, because he’s out of town all the time and his default response to anything speculative is “we’ll talk about it when I get back next week” ad infinitum. I ask my main colleague if I can help him with anything and he almost never says yes.

How much time can I spend reading stuff online before I need to feel guilty? Am I making enough of an effort to stay busy in service of the company? Is this an issue I need to raise with my manager, or is it okay to take advantage of the slow periods while staying at the office to keep up appearances? I don’t want to be a shirker.

You don’t need to feel guilty at all. You’ve asked for more work, you’ve looked for new projects yourself, you’ve asked a colleague if you can help him. There’s no cause for guilt here.

That said, I’d draw up a list of projects that you’d like to work on, and the next time you’re able to grab your manager for any significant type of conversation, get the list in front of him and ask if he’ll okay you working on any of them. If he says you’ll talk next week, follow up with him next week. And meanwhile, it’s perfectly appropriate to use the slow periods to do things like work on developing a skill, or reading industry news, or anything else that’s nominally work-related.

Read an update to this letter here.

2. Should I let a company know that I’m declining their offer because of how long they took to get it to me?

I received an offer from a company that I feel would be exciting to work at, even though it pays slightly less than my current job. I considered taking it because it is in a new field for me. However, after receiving the offer, I didn’t hear back from the company for nearly two weeks. This is even after my following up with them after they made the offer. I heard back from them yesterday and the offer is still on the table. I was asked to send them my earliest possible start date and the date I could send them my final answer by, and they said they would send over a written offer letter. I immediately sent over the requested information. It’s been a full day later and I have yet to receive the offer letter, which I need in order to evaluate and give them an answer.

I feel frustrated, and that maybe this is a flag for this company. Is it appropriate to let them know that I’m not accepting this position, and a large part of the reason is the communication around this interview/hiring process? Or is it best to just decline and walk away?

If you’re absolutely sure you’re going to decline, I’d just decline and not get into their delays — although if you wanted to hint at it, you could say, “In the time since you first reached out with the offer, I’ve moved forward with other companies. I regret we weren’t able to nail down the details sooner.”

But before you decide for sure, why not ask them about it? At whatever point you do finally get the formal offer, you could set up a time to talk with the would-be manager for the position to ask a few questions about the offer (which is totally normal to do), and in that conversation you could say something like, “I noticed that it took a few weeks to hear back once you made me the initial offer. Can I ask what was behind that delay?” You might hear that their HR team is notoriously slow but isn’t typical of the rest of the company, or that a key person was on vacation (not uncommon in August), or that they have tons of bureaucracy and this is normal. I don’t know what you’ll hear — but it could be interesting data before you make your decision.

One other thing: In some fields, this kind of timeline is very normal. Since you’re switching fields, it’s possible that you just don’t realize that this is totally in line with your new industry’s norms. I’d talk to others in the field to find out for sure before you write them off over it.

3. Manager wants me to cancel a medical appointment

I have been dealing with a serious problem with my eyes, requiring follow-up appointments with my eye doctor. I make these appointments outside of core work hours, up to four months in advance. I do not require time off work for these follow-ups.

Recently, my manager scheduled a meeting, outside of core hours. I explained that I could not attend as I had a prescheduled medical follow- up. I was told to reschedule my appointment. When I said I could not/would not, I was told I could/should reschedule and that she (my manager) has hair appointments she makes four months in advance that she “cancels and reschedules all the time.”

She may not fully understand that this isn’t something like a routine appointment that wouldn’t be a huge deal to delay. Say this: “While normally I’d do that, this particular appointment is a doctor appointment that I absolutely must keep for medical reasons; delaying it isn’t an option, medically.”

4. Applicants are ignoring instructions to include a cover letter

I’ve just started a search for an administrative assistant position at the law firm where I work. I posted an ad that includes a sentence that states: “Only resumes that are submitted with a cover letter will be considered.” I did this because the last person we hired ended up having terrible written grammar, and I want a cover letter to serve as an informal writing sample (and of course because it is helpful in getting to know an applicant beyond the resume). I have gotten 90 applicants for the position, and out of those 90, only a handful have submitted cover letters. (And one of these “cover letters” actually just said, “I’m looking to relocate ASAP.” I wish I were making that up.)

Now I’m wondering if it’s unreasonable to expect that the general public is aware of what a cover letter is or how to write one. I was taught to always send one when applying for jobs, and yet all of these applicants don’t seem to have gotten that same instruction. Some of the applicants have decent resumes, but I’m bothered by the fact that they didn’t submit cover letters. Do I address this, or just let it go?

Don’t consider the people without cover letters. In your first interaction with them, they showed that they don’t follow basic instructions. Be glad they screened themselves out early, and focus on the candidates who followed directions.

And no, your expectations aren’t unreasonable. Plenty of admin candidates manage to include cover letters; it’s not some sort of esoteric know-how.