Igloo: an intranet you’ll actually like

And now a break to talk about a sponsor…

Remember all those horror stories about remote work gone bad? Here’s a way to knock out lots of those concerns and make it easy to collaborate and manage remote work: Igloo, an awesome corporate intranet that’s probably much different from other intranets you’ve seen.

If your experience with corporate intranets has been anything like mine, you’ve found them to be clunky repositories where documents go to die, and you’ve been tied to your company computer if you want to use them, which can be restrictive if you like to work from the road or in your pajamas from home.

But Igloo is far from the traditional intranet. It’ll let you access content anywhere and at any time, without compromising on security. That means that you don’t have to be stuck at your desk to do your work. You can manage your task list from your laptop during a meeting, share status updates from your phone as you’re leaving a client site, or access the latest version of a file from home (and working in your pajamas in pretty much the best). And it’s created to look good on mobile phones, so you really can use it on the go.

It’s also interactive, incredibly easy to use, and super customizable. You can use it to pull together calendars, project information, working documents, wikis, task management, document collaboration, secure file-sharing, and real-time updates from all your teams.

It’s also strangely affordable: $12 per user per month (about a quarter of what you’d pay for Sharepoint, for example). And if you have under 10 users, it’s free (which means that if you’re skeptical, you can try it out for free with your 10 favorite coworkers before deciding). Learn more here.

Disclosure: This post is sponsored by Igloo. All thoughts and opinions are my own.

carpool drama, employee time-off demands, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My coworker is making it tough for me to share a ride with our executives

I’m at an organization where we’re in a lot of transition. We have a consultant working with us, “assessing our skills and capacity,” and we have a couple of executives who seem to be wielding all the power without giving anyone else warning.

I was lucky to be selected for an out-of-town conference with a group of my coworkers, including the two executives, and with a long-time coworker, Glenda, who is consistently unhappy with our management. Glenda is a very intelligent, talented person at her job, and I do feel she has been unfairly treated over the years. Management seems to have a personal grudge against her.

When we found that we were going to the same conference, Glenda offered me a ride to the airport, which I happily accepted. A couple of days ago, our executives emailed all of us and said they will be driving carpools since all of us will fit in their 2 vehicles. This morning, Glenda stopped by my desk and said, “Well, aren’t you glad you’re riding with me so you don’t have to ride with them?! I already let them know you’re carpooling with me.” I tried suggesting we should both carpool with them, but she said, “Oh no, it’s no trouble for me.”

Ugh. I’m in a pickle. This conference was my chance to re-establish a positive working relationship with my bosses during a really rough time at our organization, but I think that refusing their carpool offer for no good reason is going to get me on their bad side right off the bat. On the other hand, I don’t want Glenda to think that one of the only people in the office who supports her is now trying to distance herself from her. Distancing myself would probably be the smart thing, but I would feel awful about it. What can I do?

Just be direct: “Actually, I’d really love the opportunity to spend some time with Jane and Fergus. I think it could be great for you to too, if you’re interested. Why don’t we take them up on their offer?” If she says she doesn’t want to, then you say, “Okay. I’m going to go ahead and do it. Thank you so much for being willing to take me though.”

2. Employee is demanding I approve time off at an inconvenient time

I have an employee who expects that he should be granted his vacation requests regardless of the impact it has on a very small department. His first set of dates were approved. He then submitted a second set, to extend his dates, and without approval went ahead and booked his travel. He is attempting to bully his way into having the additional time off.

In fact, he is demanding his birthday off as a Friday – Monday long weekend off with a degree of “entitlement.” His attitude is all wrong and he seems to care less about the impact his extended absence will have on the workflow of the department during a very busy period.

How do I handle this? And do I simply deny him both set of dates including the birthday, given the impact it will have on the department and not being able to function efficiently without him as it is a peak period?

Well, if it’s truly a particularly bad time for him to be gone and you can’t reasonably make it work without him, then you explain that and say no, and make it clear that you regret that’s the case. But if there’s any way to make it work, I’d try to — vacation time is part of your staff’s benefits package and while it’s absolutely true that there can be certain times where it’s just not realistic to take time away, in general you want your default to be to try to make it work if at all possible.

(Also, I’d want to know whether people are usually able to use their vacation time in chunks of at least a week at a time. If they are, and this is a rare situation, that’s a point in favor of your stance. But if you never really want people to take a week off or if you only allow it during very narrow windows, that’s not reasonable — small department or not.)

3. Correcting another company’s language usage

I work in Europe, and most of my job function revolves around my native English skills – I work in communications and content, and my duties include running a blog, handling social media, etc. For every job I’ve worked here in Germany, one of my duties is usually to proofread and correct presentations and documents.

Recently, an external company came to pitch us their services. I’ve developed an excellent rapport with our contact at this external company, Teapots Inc. I speak with him frequently and we get along quite well. During his pitch meeting, I noticed several obvious and distracting English spelling and grammatical mistakes in his PowerPoint presentation, as well as some odd wording. Given that Teapots specializes in content and text production, and they boast about their ability to provide “quality content in multiple languages,” I desperately wanted to point out the few changes. Not because I’m a grammar freak, but because I have a lot of respect for my contact at this company, and I worry that a template like this may be recycled and may hurt their pitches in the future.

He had sent me the presentation as a PDF, and after much deliberation, at the bottom of an email discussing other relevant business topics, I attached the revised PDF with a few minor corrections with a short disclaimer – “Your English is great, I don’t mean to insult you, I want to help you for future proposals,” etc.

I wanted your opinion on something like this. Normally I would never point out typos but given the language difficulties, as well as the nature of his business, I made a judgment call. What would you have done?

I think that was fine to do. There’s an argument to be made, though, that this company’s prospective clients are better off getting an accurate look at the company’s language skills, and you’ve just made it a little harder for them to spot potential problems. But I think it was kind of you to point it out, regardless.

4. I don’t want a prospective employer to confirm my employment with my current company

Will my new prospective company absolutely confirm my employment with my current company ? I’d rather my current company not know I am looking. Also, my current company is very small, with really no HR department. What can you say/suggest?

It’s very normal to ask that your current employer not be contacted since they don’t know that you’re looking. There’s no iron-clad guarantee that some crappy employer won’t mess up and do it anyway, but it’s highly unlikely.

5. Do you get sick time paid out when you leave your job?

If my employer fires you, do they have to pay you your sick time you accrued throughout your time there?

Sick time, no. Vacation time, maybe, depending on whether you live in a state that requires it.

weekend free-for-all – July 25-26, 2015

Eve

Eve.

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly no work and no school. If you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Book Recommendation of the Week: The Fiddler in the Subway: The Story of the World-Class Violinist Who Played for Handouts. . . And Other Virtuoso Performances by America’s Foremost Feature Writer, by Gene Weingarten. This is a collection of essays by one of my favorite Washington Post writers, including one about the time he had virtuoso violinist Joshua Bell play in the D.C. subway for spare change, to see if anyone would notice his music. (Spoiler: Few people did.) Pretty much every essay in here leaves me with a lump in my throat; he has an incredible talent for finding beauty and profundity everywhere.

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

interviewer missed two phone interviews, exposing tattoos to coworkers, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Interviewer missed our phone interview twice

I’m currently employed but am really miserable at my job, so I’ve been applying for several different types of positions, trying to make a change. I submitted a resume for an office manager position at a small nonprofit, and was contacted a couple of days later by the administration director to set up a phone interview for the next day (Friday) or Monday. Unfortunately I was working late that evening and didn’t see her email until about 9 p.m. I immediately responded to say that Monday, my day off, would be perfect and suggested three times that worked well for me. I received no response on Friday or over the weekend, but made sure I was awake and prepared before the first suggested time on Monday just in case she called. After all of the suggested times had passed, she sent an email to say she realized she hadn’t gotten back to me and to ask if I was available at 9 a.m. on Tuesday. I immediately wrote back to say yes, and to make sure she had my phone number. I woke up early this morning to prepare, and waited an hour for her to call. At 10:15, I sent her an email to say that I was sorry we weren’t able to connect and to ask if she wanted to reschedule. When sending this email, I noticed that her email address is a personal one and not one associated with the nonprofit, so who knows when she will get it. I know that I should have called her at 9:20 or so, but I’m phone phobic (I’m working on it).

Frankly, I’m annoyed. I woke up early on my day off and sat at home for half the day just in case, and I woke up early before work today just to sit here anxiously awaiting her call again. This person would be my boss if I got the job, and I don’t think this speaks highly of her or the organization. Is this as big of a red flag as I feel like it is? Am I overreacting? If she emails me about rescheduling, what should I say? I really do need to find a new job, so am I shooting myself in the foot if I choose to not proceed with any opportunities?

You’re justified in being annoyed. Maybe not as much with the first phone call because she hadn’t actually confirmed that one, but the second one, certainly. If she emails you about rescheduling, I’d pay attention to whether she sounds apologetic and a bit mortified or whether she’s cavalier about it; if she’s cavalier, it’s par for the course in how she operates.

If you really need a job and don’t have many options, there’s no harm in continuing in their process; nothing says you have to accept an offer if you get one, after all. And as the process plays out, you can a pay a lot of attention to whether the organization seems organized or chaotic and unprofessional, and can get a better idea of what you’d be signing up for.

2. Exposing my tattoos to coworkers outside of work hours

I have tattoos, and I never expose them in the workplace regardless of whether it’s “allowed,” since I don’t want to affect my professional image and like to keep that part of me to my personal life. But I’m in a new job and several of my new coworkers are cool and we have done some light socializing outside of work. I have just kept my tattoos covered for socializing to this point, but tomorrow I’m going to a strenuous workout class with one of my new coworkers. I’m suddenly getting nervous about revealing my tattoos (which wouldn’t be totally covered in a short sleeved shirt). They aren’t anything offensive and this is away from work and outside of work hours, but I am concerned that she’ll casually mention it to my manager, who she is close with, and then I could be put in an uncomfortable position of having to address good-natured curiosity while still wanting to keep my boundaries at work by not revealing them, especially to my (male) manager in the office.

Is there a way I can casually ask for her discretion/confidence or would that be making too big a deal of it? Should I try to build a collection of 3/4-length workout shirts somehow?

I think you’re making too big of a deal about it. It’s unlikely that your coworker will care and even less likely that she’ll mention it to your manager. But if your manager does happen to ask you about them, it’s fine to just say, “Oh, at work I pretend I don’t have them” or “Forget you heard that; I don’t like to expose them at work” or something like that.

3. Following up months after hearing nothing post-interview

I recently did a month-long interview process with a company. It included several phone interviews and a day-long interview with the team I’d be working on. I spoke with the HR manager a week after the interview and the manager said they’d get back to me “soon” with a yes/no. I followed up a few weeks later with an email and a phone call, but never heard back. It’s been two months and it’s pretty clear they’ve passed on me. The problem is this company fulfills a very specific role in the industry I work in and there are no companies like it in my region, so there’s a good chance we’ll cross paths or I’ll want to reapply for a position in the future.

Is there a way I can email without sounding desperate and saying something to the extent of, I hope we can work together in the future? I want to make sure no bridges are burned and that in spite of the HR person not doing their job, I don’t get passed up in the future because they remember they never called me back. I also accepted another job, so maybe I can say something to the extent of I’m withdrawing my application, so it doesn’t look poorly on them?

It’s actually possible that they still haven’t made a hiring decision and you’re still in the running, although it’s at least as likely that they have and just didn’t bother to get back to you, which is weirdly common. In any case, though, since you’ve accepted another job, you have perfect context for emailing. I’d say something like this: “Hi Jane, I’m not sure if the X position is still being filled or not, but I wanted to let you know that I’ve accepted another job and so should withdraw from consideration. I also want to let you know how much I enjoyed our conversations, and I’d love to talk with you in the future if another position opens up that you think might be a good fit.”

Even without that, though, I don’t think you’d need to worry that they’d be too ashamed to reach out to you in the future because they went AWOL on you this time. Companies that operate this way don’t think it’s a big deal and don’t feel much shame about it.

4. Can my references overlap with my letters of recommendation?

I’m applying for a position that asks for three references on the online application form and two letters of recommendation to be uploaded to their system afterwards. Should two of the three application form references be the same people as those I have gathered letters of recommendation from?

The parameters of the situation are as follows:
• I have enough good references to fill all five slots, reference letters and application references, independently.
• I was contacted directly by the hiring manager who asked me if I was interested in this position.
• I met the hiring manager after going to on an information interview with them which was arranged by one of my references for this job who was a colleague of the hiring manager.
• The hiring manger and my mutual connection cannot write a letter of recommendation because she was not my direct supervisor, but is willing to give me a good reference.
• Our mutual connection is on good terms with the hiring manager.

I think it’s fine for some of your references to be the same people who wrote letters of recommendation. If the employer wants different references, they’ll tell you.

Also, I hope this is law or academia, because otherwise asking for letters of recommendation is silly and not generally done.

5. Are our new break rules legal?

I am a non-exempt assistant manager at a large retail store in Pennsylvania. For years, the managers (there are 7 of us, of varying titles and responsibilities) were allowed to combine our 30-minute unpaid lunch breaks with our two paid 15-minute breaks to get an hour-long break, which was really nice. Being away from the store for an hour allowed me to accomplish a lot, including the ability to run errands, take a nice long head-clearing walk, or just relax and catch my breath.

Anyway, about 4 months ago, there was a change in upper management, and we were told (via email) to “discontinue this practice immediately.” In addition, we were told that the 30-minute unpaid break “must be taken,” but that the paid 15-minute breaks were at the store manager’s discretion, and easier to overlook when business demands it. In other words, if it’s busy (and it always is! we are tragically understaffed in a company-wide effort to save payroll), you’re not getting your 15-minute breaks. We are also not allowed to leave early to make up for that time.

As a management team, we’ve all done what we’ve been asked to do regarding this policy change, but I wonder if it’s legal. We are required to give our employees all of the breaks that they are due throughout the day, and if they miss one because it’s busy, we let them leave early. If our employees are non-exempt, and the managers are also non-exempt, what’s the difference? I couldn’t find anything specific to this on our HR website, nor was I able to ascertain any information from the Pennsylvania labor laws.

Yep, it’s legal, assuming you’re all 18 or older. Pennsylvania actually doesn’t require employers to provide any breaks to adult employees, so your employer can come up with whatever rules they want, as long as they’re paying you for all the time you do work. (In general, to find this kind of information for your state, google the state name plus “break laws.”)

end your doubts about cover letters, all ye who enter here

A reader writes:

I’m sure you get tons of emails letting you know how helpful your site is, but I’d like to express my gratitude because your advice helped me land my dream job.

As background, I was working for a large corporation with (what I felt was) a toxic work environment doing a job that I hated. Naturally, I was looking for new employment.

A good friend of mine sent me a job posting for a position with a note saying that I would be perfect for the job. When I read it, I felt like I was looking in a mirror. When I started researching the small non-profit, I fell in love with it (and wish I had discovered it earlier because I would have loved to have taken advantage of their resources even before looking for new employment). I really wanted this job.

I knew that a good cover letter would be important, but I felt very insecure with ones I had written in the past. I’m a decent writer, but I felt that the ones I had written based on advice I had received in the past were ineffective. So, I started googling and found your site. I read every post on cover letters and especially appreciated the real world examples of good ones (I know you’ve “sworn off” them, but I found them incredibly helpful.) With new tools in my belt, I wrote my letter and sent off my application.

During my first interview, I was told that my cover letter was amazing. In my second interview, they told me again how much they liked it. I got the job (and I love it!) and (because of my position) I’ve seen some of the notes that were written about the many applicants – in the “pros” section for me, they wrote, “really great cover letter.”

Obviously, I didn’t get the job just because of the cover letter – my experience and temperament really mesh with this job and the company – but clearly it was a huge part in getting me to the front of the applicant list.

​Thank you again for your excellent advice and website. You gave me exactly what I needed to get into a position in which I am happy, challenged, and making a competitive salary – it really doesn’t get better than this.

That is awesome. Thank you for taking the time to say it, and for reinforcing the importance of writing a great cover letter — something that people doubt me on all the time, but there is a reason I keep pushing it and you are illustrating it. My mail is full of letters from people who talk about how their job search changed dramatically once they started writing better cover letters. It matters.

I’m glad for another opportunity to say it.

should I ask out an employee at a store where I shop?

A reader writes:

I am an adult who has a crush on someone (also an adult) who works in retail. He may be a manager. He’s rung me up (cash register, not phone) multiple times and we’ve done the usual chitchat, and when I’m at his store he very obviously stares at me and often pops up in the areas that I’m shopping in. Granted, this could mean nothing, but it’s impossible for me to know what’s going on since the only place that I ever see him is in this store. I’d like to find out what he’s thinking, but it’s kind of awkward since since he’s at work.

If you were interested in a customer, what would you do about it? What would think if one of your employees asked out a customer? What do you think about customers asking you out? And what do you think about customers asking out your employees? I’m assuming that some places have policies about this sort of thing but have no idea about the policies at this store. At any rate, I don’t want to do anything to make him uncomfortable, and if things go awry then I’ll most likely try to avoid him or stop shopping at this place altogether, which would be really inconvenient, so would really appreciate your advice.

Well, the tricky thing about asking out someone in a customer service position is that their job requires them to be nice to you. Because of that, it can be easy to mistakenly misinterpret them doing their job (being nice to you) as social/romantic interest. And of course, a lot of people would prefer not to field come-ons while they’re working.

That doesn’t mean that you should never do it or that it never works out, but it does mean that if you’re going to do it, it’s key to approach it in a low-key way that makes it really, really easy for the person to say no. It also means that you have to go out of your way to make them comfortable if they do say no (no signs of resentment or bitterness or other weirdness), because after all you did take the risk of asking someone out in their place of work.

There’s also no way to guarantee it’ll go smoothly (he could say no, or you could go out and it could be disastrous), so if that’s going to keep you from shopping there, you’ve got to decide which you want more: the possibility of a date with him or the certainty that you can continue comfortably going to that store.

That, of course, is why lots of managers would rather customers not ask out their employees — it’s a good way to lose customers who then feel too awkward to return.

open thread – July 24, 2015

It’s the Friday open thread! The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please don’t repost it here, as it may be in the to-be-answered queue :)

a sketchy assistant with a fancy watch, wearing lots of wigs, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Assistant might have bought himself a fancy watch on the company credit card

I recently took over Operations at a small applied engineering company. In the time between when the old operations manager left and I started, the owner’s assistant took over some of the operational and financial responsibility. He recently bought a very expensive watch from a local jeweler and used the corporate courier account to have it delivered to the tune of $100. When it arrived, he implied that the company bought the watch “as a birthday present.” We don’t really buy gifts for employees, and he hasn’t been here long enough to get a milestone anniversary gift (he’s been here just under 1 year). The trouble is: I can’t prove that he used the corporate card to buy the watch, since one of the responsibilities he took on was managing the corporate cards!

My coworkers have warned me that the owner has a soft spot for his assistant, and that he lets him get away with a lot. I want to nip this behavior in the bud, but I don’t want to step on toes if the owner has some agreement that he could use the courier account to have personal items delivered, or if I’m completely misreading the situation. I want to recommend that better checks and balances be put into place for company cards without immediately accusing the golden child of stealing from the cookie jar. Is there a way to gently tell my boss I think his friend is stealing from him?

You can be direct in asking the owner about it without sounding like you’re criticizing his favorite; the key is to ask in a neutral tone, one that sounds curious rather than judgmental. I’d just say something like, “Did you by chance approve the purchase of a watch for Rupert?” If he says yes, well, he’s the company owner and he can do that if he wants. But if he says no, let him know what the assistant told you. Here too, avoid judgment in your tone since he has a soft spot for the guy; your tone should be neutral/concerned.

Separately, you can ask, “Can you fill me in on how the courier account works? I might have misunderstood, but I got the impression an employee had used it for a personal item — is it okay for people to do that or something that I should stop if I see it happening?”

Beyond that, if it’s in your purview to come up with a better system for company credit cards, you should do that — and it should include having someone other than the assistant review and approve purchases. And keep an eye on this guy more broadly too in order to get more data (since currently this is more suspicion than fact).

2. I was offered a job that never panned out

I’m hoping you can help me make sense of this. Back in September, I was first contacted by the owner of a publishing company for a desk job – data entry, customer service, and the like. After three interviews, I was hired in early November. And, on that third interview, was asked if I could stay for a few hours to do some work. I said yes and just helped file a few things around the small office, since they were transitioning the work areas still.

After that, and signing a W-2 and other papers, I was told to come in after the Thanksgiving break to start officially as a part-time employee, then full-time once the first of the year rolled along.

The first workday after Thanksgiving, I was up, getting dressed when I received a call at 7 a.m. from the owner’s secretary saying things have been put behind and to come in after the first of the year.

I thought no biggie, I can hold off a month, but I was getting antsy so I still pursued other jobs. First of the year rolls around, and this time I call in and get the same response. So, I partially give up on it, seeking other work.

A month after that, this is where it gets interesting. I went to a local job fair and guess who I find, but the guy who hired me so many months ago. I asked him if he remembered me, gave him my resume, and said, “Y’know, you hired me once already, but if you want to go over my qualifications again, I’m here.” He laughed and said he’d look into it.

Each Monday after that, I called leaving messages only for his secretary who consistently said he was out and finally I emailed him to his own personal email only for him to say that they went with someone else with sales experience. I responded with, then why did you hire me, to begin with? No response. At this point, I’m just flabbergasted as to what to do about this, or if I should even bother. What happened and CAN I do anything about this?

I have no idea what happened — it could be anything from simple flakiness on their side to having concerns about your qualifications that they didn’t fully process until after offering you the job to finding someone they thought was better for the job. Regardless of what it was, they owed you a phone call and an explanation (and an apology).

As for whether there’s anything you can do about it: No, not unless you had a contract, which most U.S. workers don’t. The most you could really do is to let them know that you held off looking for other work because they hired you and that you’ve suffered financially as a result, but these sound like people who won’t even bother responding to that.

If it helps, keep in mind that they showed you something useful about themselves — that they’re rude and unwilling to tolerate even minor discomfort on their side in order to spare you major inconvenience (and possible financial harm).

3. Wearing wigs — lots of wigs

I was recently diagnosed with a medical condition that causes hair loss. Not just a little thinning, but giant bald patches all over my head. There are other aspects of my illness, but I’m working with a doctor on those symptoms and they are well-controlled, so they don’t impact my work.

I’ve been wearing my hair up a lot at work to cover the worst of it, so it’s gone unnoticed, but my hair is now mostly gone and there’s no clever way to hide it anymore.

I’d like to start wearing wigs, and people in a disease-oriented support group recommended getting a few different colors and styles to help cheer me up and make this part of the the illness fun. I do like this idea–being blonde one day, redhead the next–it takes the “omg I have to wear a wig” feeling out a bit.

Do you have any indication about how an employer would feel about this? I work for a 100+ person organization that leans on the side of conservative, but is very kind in its approach to employees. Would most employers prefer I choose one neat and simple style and color and stay with it? Or do you think more employers would be open to different types,as long as they fell within the “neat and professional range”?

I could see a conservative employer objecting to someone doing this if it weren’t for a medical condition — but being fine with it if they understood that it was. So I think it comes down to whether you’re comfortable sharing that piece of it; if you are, I say go for it.

4. Should I complain to an employer about their hiring process?

I went through a lengthy process with a potential employer, spanning about two months. The company is a start-up of three years in my field. My first point of contact was with the person I would be reporting to. I interviewed with her (after several last-minute reschedulings on her part). It went well, so she gave me an assignment to complete. This was a fairly large assignment that I worked on for the better part of a week. She was so impressed she sent it to the CEO and arranged interviews with the CEO and other department heads. They went well, so she asked for references. She called one, who–I’m as sure as you can be without hearing the conversation–raved, then she told the others conversations weren’t needed (after reaching out to them originally).

I heard nothing, so followed up the next week. She said they had chosen another candidate and best of luck with future endeavors. (I should note that the CEO mentioned during my interview with him that I wasn’t up against another candidate per se, as they were growing and just looking for new people.)

I feel that their process treated me poorly, and since the CEO talked about how bad management typically is at other firms in this industry, I feel I should tell him so. Agree? It won’t help me, but if it improves their process it might help someone else. (Do some good in the world!) I think that if a candidate undertakes a substantial written project, and the employer contacts references, something more than “no thanks, but best of luck” is called for. Or should we just accept that employers can do whatever they want because they have the leverage and candidates should just accept it?

It sounds like you think they treated you poorly because they gave you the impression that you were likely to be offered the job, and then that didn’t happen. But that’s not a reasonable complaint — they retain the prerogative to offer the job to someone else or to no one, right up until the point that they offer it to you. If you complain that they led you on, you’ll look silly and it won’t have an impact.

The one thing I see that went wrong here is that you spent “the better part of a week” on an assignment that I assume was unpaid. That’s not appropriate. I don’t know if they knew it would take that long or if you just chose to put that much time in to really excel at it, but while giving candidates a short assignment is a really smart way of assessing their candidacy, it’s not in any way okay to expect them to put a week of work into something for free. It still doesn’t put you in a position where you can now complain that they didn’t hire you (they never promised you they would, after all), but you can certainly remember for the future that you shouldn’t do that kind of significant work in this context.

5. Should I send a thank-you when I’ve already been offered the job?

I went in for a teaching position interview this afternoon. I felt like the interview went okay, and I hit it off with the department chair, but I didn’t feel like it was stellar.

Anyway, I went home and was trying to talk myself into moving on, when my phone rings and it’s them with an offer. I accepted immediately as I was really hoping for an offer in the district for several reasons.

Should I still send a thank-you letter for the interview, or include some words about being excited to start at the school (because it’s true!) or what? I’ve never encountered an offer this quickly, so I’m not sure how to proceed, but I don’t want to not send anything!

Sending a traditional post-interview thank-you would be weird, since you’re already past the stage where that normally happens; they’ve already offered you the job and you’ve accepted it. You can certainly send your new manager a note telling her how excited you are to start if you’d like to, but it shouldn’t be a thank-you.

how to answer “what could your current employer do to keep you?”

A reader writes:

Can you please provide your take on what is the best way to answer “What would your current employer have to do in order to keep you?”

This is an actual question that I was recently asked in an interview, and I was really at a loss on how to answer it. My situation is a bit unique because I actually really like my current job. I respect my boss and we have a great working relationship. I have a very nice work-life balance and flexible hours. The work itself is challenging and stimulating. The pay could be better, but I am currently at a point in life where flexibility matters more than money (I recently had a baby and I am able to arrange my work hours aground her needs).

The only reason why I am looking for a new job right now is because the company that I am working for is really not doing well financially (in the past couple of months, they’ve struggled to make payroll). I am concerned that if I do not find a new job right now on my own terms, I might be forced to look for one very soon anyway. So, since it is always easier to get a job when you already have one, I started looking, even though I do realize that it would likely be impossible to find an employer that would allow me to have the same work-life balance.

When the interviewer asked me what it would take for my current company to keep me, I was really caught off guard. I don’t even remember what I answered, but it probably wasn’t too horrible since the company wants me to come in for a second interview. But I really would like to get your thoughts on what is the best way to handle this question, in case I ever have to answer it again.

Well, they’re asking for a few reasons:

First, it could produce legitimately interesting information — like that you’d stay if your boss left, or that you’re looking because staying isn’t an option (because they want you to go), or that you hate everyone you work with. Or it might just give them insight into what you’re really looking for in a new job, and whether the role they’re hiring for is going to be satisfying to you.

Second, they’re trying to see if they’d be likely to lose you to a counter-offer. If you say you’re looking only due to money, they’re going to wonder if they’ll make you an offer, your employer will counter-offer, and that’ll be the end of that.

Third, they might be interested in knowing how you handle it when you’re unhappy. If you say that you’re job searching because you want more opportunity to do client-facing work, a smart interviewer will ask if you’ve approached your current manager about that prospect. If you say that you haven’t (in a context that makes it clear you could), you’re signaling that you’re someone who will just leave rather than talking straightforwardly to your current employer about what would keep you there. As a prospective employer, that’s worrisome; I want to know that if you’re unhappy to the point of leaving, you’ll give me a chance to fix it (if it’s fixable).

And just to be clear, they’re not definitely assuming that your answer will give them insight into all this. As with a lot of interview questions, it just opens the possibility that it will, so they figure it’s worth asking — but they also know they might get an answer that isn’t particularly enlightening. And that’s fine, as long as you don’t appear to be actually dodging the question. In other words, don’t feel like you have to find an answer that will give them this kind of insight; they’re just asking in case it happens to. (The same is true with question like “why are you thinking about leaving your current job?”)

In any case, here are some possible answers to this question that shouldn’t raise any red flags:

* “I’ve really enjoyed working there and it’s not about anything they’re doing or not doing; I’ve been there six years and I’m ready for a new challenge.”

* “If there was something simple they could do, I’d have raised it with them — I’d want to give us both a chance to see if we could make that work. But I’m really just ready to move on to something new.”

* “I’d like to work more with chocolate teapots, and that’s not a possibility in my current company; we focus exclusively on raspberry teapots.”

* Or in your case: “I’ve really enjoyed my work there, but they’re having trouble making payroll, so I think it’s time for me to be looking at what’s next. I suppose if their financial problems were solved overnight, I’d consider staying, but it feels like the right time to be moving on to something new regardless, and I’m excited about this role with your company because…”

the real reason your team isn’t telling you what they think

Managers often say that they want candid input from their teams – but then act in ways that virtually ensure they won’t get it. That’s bad for you as a manager, because it means that you might not hear about problems in time to easily fix them, won’t get input that could help you make better decisions, and could even lead to trouble retaining your best people.

The tricky thing about this, though, is that it can be hard to recognize how you’re creating this dynamic. So here are some of the most common ways that managers inadvertently discourage candor on their team – as well as how you can steer clear of these traps.

1. You say you want candor but then get defensive or punish the messenger. Ever worked for someone who paid lots of lip service to the idea that all opinions were welcome and appeared to encourage dissent, only to lash out at people who tried speaking up? If so, you probably saw what happened: People quickly learn to ignore the lofty talk about candor and instead keep their opinions to themselves. Most people will pay less attention to what you say than to what you do – so how you react when someone disagrees or pushes back on your ideas will have a huge impact on whether people continue to share their real thoughts with you or not.

2. You take feedback well, but you favor team members who always agree with you. This one is a little more subtle than #1, but people will pick up on it over time: You might take feedback beautifully, even express genuine appreciation for it. But if you have a pattern of favoring the yes-men on your team – giving them more of your time, attention, and approval and maybe even the best assignments (because they don’t challenge you and thus are easier to work with), you’re signaling that if people want to advance under your leadership, they need to spout the party line.

3. You don’t model candor yourself. If your team never sees you take risks with your own boss – for instance, you never push back on priorities or strategies even when your team knows you disagree – they’re likely to take their cues from you. On the other hand, if they see that you’re willing to advocate a point of view even when it’s not in sync with your own boss’s, they’ll be more likely to trust that you’ll try to resolve issues that they themselves speak up about.

4. You assume that not hearing disagreement means that people agree with you. If you propose an idea at a meeting and ask for people’s thoughts and hear nothing but a positive (or neutral) response, don’t be quick to assume that everyone’s on board. Some people may have reservations that they won’t share unless you go out of your way to draw them out. Try saying things like:

  • “What are the downsides/challenges with this?”
  • “If you had to poke holes in this, what would you say?”
  • “If this ended up not working, why do you think that would be?”
  • “I’m not 100% sold that this is the way to go, so would really like to hear other perspectives on it.”

If you haven’t deliberately created an environment that welcomes candor and makes it safe for people to speak freely, you can’t assume that they are. Spend some time drawing people out, reward them for voicing difficult opinions (with sincere gratitude and public praise for pushing back, even if you ultimately don’t agree), and you’re more likely to hear what your team really thinks about things.